+1 for muslamic ray guns 
Please don't. I still feel the need to apologise for that idiot whenever I see that video.
Apologise to who and for what?
Topic: Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs - page 6. (Read 4407 times)
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Please don't. I still feel the need to apologise for that idiot whenever I see that video.
Apologise to who and for what?
+1 for muslamic ray guns
Please don't. I still feel the need to apologise for that idiot whenever I see that video.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Quote
Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs
No it isn't.
This title is completely wrong.
No law has been changed, all that has happened is that advice has been given on how to write wills within the current laws.
Yup, typical fear-mongering from the anti-Islamic crowd omg muslims are taking over with their muslamic ray guns blah blah blah.
Yes, I appreciate that. islamic law is good and perfect law in the world. i like follow this law. but world is didn't follow this law. am so sad.
Yes, OP is idiotic. The article posted is not 
The article is idiotic. The power to create Shariah compliant wills is already there in English probate law. This was guidance on how to do it.
What sort of BS is this? Bitcoin is Shariah compilant? Perhaps Satoshi Nakamoto did a honors in Islamic theology before creating the Bitcoin. Just keep religion out of Bitcoin. 
Just pointing out the idiocy in the OP.
Bitcoin is not sharia compliant. Everybody knows that.
OP is idiotic.
Sharia law, like all religious doctrines is ridiculous, but either you accept religion exists or you don't. The power to draw up a Shariah compliant will is already granted under UK probate law. This is guidance on how to do it.
This isn't about enshrining Islamic law, this is about catering for the needs of a diverse society. We allow Muslims to be married by Imams, is this a parallel legal system? We have halal food - a parallel system? Islamic compliant financial institutions - a parallel system?
Even Israel, which has some of the worst anti-Muslim racism in the world, has state funded Sharia law courts and actually enforces parts of Shariah law.
And guess what - Bitcoin is very close to being Shariah compliant, and is actually more Sharia compliant than paper money. OMG - it's an Islamic conspiracy!!
I repeat: OP is idiotic.
Sharia law, like all religious doctrines is ridiculous, but either you accept religion exists or you don't. The power to draw up a Shariah compliant will is already granted under UK probate law. This is guidance on how to do it.
This isn't about enshrining Islamic law, this is about catering for the needs of a diverse society. We allow Muslims to be married by Imams, is this a parallel legal system? We have halal food - a parallel system? Islamic compliant financial institutions - a parallel system?
Even Israel, which has some of the worst anti-Muslim racism in the world, has state funded Sharia law courts and actually enforces parts of Shariah law.
And guess what - Bitcoin is very close to being Shariah compliant, and is actually more Sharia compliant than paper money. OMG - it's an Islamic conspiracy!!
I repeat: OP is idiotic.
Yes, OP is idiotic. The article posted is not
What sort of BS is this? Bitcoin is Shariah compilant? Perhaps Satoshi Nakamoto did a honors in Islamic theology before creating the Bitcoin. Just keep religion out of Bitcoin.
Just pointing out the idiocy in the OP.
And guess what - Bitcoin is very close to being Shariah compliant, and is actually more Sharia compliant than paper money. OMG - it's an Islamic conspiracy!!
What sort of BS is this? Bitcoin is Shariah compilant? Perhaps Satoshi Nakamoto did a honors in Islamic theology before creating the Bitcoin. Just keep religion out of Bitcoin.
OP is idiotic.
Sharia law, like all religious doctrines is ridiculous, but either you accept religion exists or you don't. The power to draw up a Shariah compliant will is already granted under UK probate law. This is guidance on how to do it.
This isn't about enshrining Islamic law, this is about catering for the needs of a diverse society. We allow Muslims to be married by Imams, is this a parallel legal system? We have halal food - a parallel system? Islamic compliant financial institutions - a parallel system?
Even Israel, which has some of the worst anti-Muslim racism in the world, has state funded Sharia law courts and actually enforces parts of Shariah law.
And guess what - Bitcoin is very close to being Shariah compliant, and is actually more Sharia compliant than paper money. OMG - it's an Islamic conspiracy!!
I repeat: OP is idiotic.
Sharia law, like all religious doctrines is ridiculous, but either you accept religion exists or you don't. The power to draw up a Shariah compliant will is already granted under UK probate law. This is guidance on how to do it.
This isn't about enshrining Islamic law, this is about catering for the needs of a diverse society. We allow Muslims to be married by Imams, is this a parallel legal system? We have halal food - a parallel system? Islamic compliant financial institutions - a parallel system?
Even Israel, which has some of the worst anti-Muslim racism in the world, has state funded Sharia law courts and actually enforces parts of Shariah law.
And guess what - Bitcoin is very close to being Shariah compliant, and is actually more Sharia compliant than paper money. OMG - it's an Islamic conspiracy!!
I repeat: OP is idiotic.
Oh my dear Doggy,
I do enjoy your reactions to my threads for sure, as nothing in the world forces you to read and react to them. For the time you take to do this, away from your busy life I am grateful. But out of context? Nope. I usually copy paste an article that get my attention and, maybe I would add a personal reaction separated with a -------------from the original article.
Obviously you may have issues with the author of an article as I post articles I like AND articles I hate.
I do enjoy your reactions to my threads for sure, as nothing in the world forces you to read and react to them. For the time you take to do this, away from your busy life I am grateful. But out of context? Nope. I usually copy paste an article that get my attention and, maybe I would add a personal reaction separated with a -------------from the original article.
Obviously you may have issues with the author of an article as I post articles I like AND articles I hate.
Don't worry, I enjoy it.
But fair point, "out of context" isn't the right phrase to use. The author of the piece intended for the headline and opening statements to be misleading, and you are aiding/abetting by uncritically reposting it. And your '-----' response was to ask whether 'the UK' is capitulating to a terrorist attack by allowing private citizens to write wills.
I believe the controversy is that Sharia is the opposite of where the modern world wants to be and we are humouring those who wish to abide by it rather than ridiculing them. No?
Oh my dear Doggy,
I do enjoy your reactions to my threads for sure, as nothing in the world forces you to read and react to them. For the time you take to do this, away from your busy life I am grateful. But out of context? Nope. I usually copy paste an article that get my attention and, maybe I would add a personal reaction separated with a -------------from the original article.
Obviously you may have issues with the author of an article as I post articles I like AND articles I hate.
I do enjoy your reactions to my threads for sure, as nothing in the world forces you to read and react to them. For the time you take to do this, away from your busy life I am grateful. But out of context? Nope. I usually copy paste an article that get my attention and, maybe I would add a personal reaction separated with a -------------from the original article.
Obviously you may have issues with the author of an article as I post articles I like AND articles I hate.
Don't worry, I enjoy it.
But fair point, "out of context" isn't the right phrase to use. The author of the piece intended for the headline and opening statements to be misleading, and you are aiding/abetting by uncritically reposting it. And your '-----' response was to ask whether 'the UK' is capitulating to a terrorist attack by allowing private citizens to write wills.
No matter how insane my posts may be for some, we are all bitcoin lovers (excluding the NSA spooks and bankster pawns here on this forum). That is, after all, the real Big Picture
Good step. Around 20% of the British schoolchildren are Muslim, and it will go up to 50% in 2050. So this step is welcome.
Oh Willy you're at it again... Is there nothing you enjoy more than posting hysterical headlines out of context?
TLDR:
- It is legal in many countries, including the UK to specify exactly who gets your money when you die
- Many muslim citizens wish to distribute their money according to sharia law
- Sharia 'law' has no legal standing whatsoever in the UK legal system, despite near-continuous assertions by paranoid right-wingers that "the muslamics" will be sneaking it through Parliament any day now.
- A professional association of lawyers (which also has no legal standing in the UK) has recently issued guidance to help lawyers write wills of this kind when clients ask for it.
All that being said, I would condemn people who choose to discriminate against their female relatives based on their backward religion.
TLDR:
- It is legal in many countries, including the UK to specify exactly who gets your money when you die
- Many muslim citizens wish to distribute their money according to sharia law
- Sharia 'law' has no legal standing whatsoever in the UK legal system, despite near-continuous assertions by paranoid right-wingers that "the muslamics" will be sneaking it through Parliament any day now.
- A professional association of lawyers (which also has no legal standing in the UK) has recently issued guidance to help lawyers write wills of this kind when clients ask for it.
All that being said, I would condemn people who choose to discriminate against their female relatives based on their backward religion.
Oh my dear Doggy,
I do enjoy your reactions to my threads for sure, as nothing in the world forces you to read and react to them. For the time you take to do this, away from your busy life I am grateful. But out of context? Nope. I usually copy paste an article that get my attention and, maybe I would add a personal reaction separated with a -------------from the original article.
Obviously you may have issues with the author of an article as I post articles I like AND articles I hate.
To be fair, the deliberately misleading headline is directly from the Torygraph.
Oh Willy you're at it again... Is there nothing you enjoy more than posting hysterical headlines out of context?
TLDR:
- It is legal in many countries, including the UK to specify exactly who gets your money when you die
- Many muslim citizens wish to distribute their money according to sharia law
- Sharia 'law' has no legal standing whatsoever in the UK legal system, despite near-continuous assertions by paranoid right-wingers that "the muslamics" will be sneaking it through Parliament any day now.
- A professional association of lawyers (which also has no legal standing in the UK) has recently issued guidance to help lawyers write wills of this kind when clients ask for it.
All that being said, I would condemn people who choose to discriminate against their female relatives based on their backward religion.
TLDR:
- It is legal in many countries, including the UK to specify exactly who gets your money when you die
- Many muslim citizens wish to distribute their money according to sharia law
- Sharia 'law' has no legal standing whatsoever in the UK legal system, despite near-continuous assertions by paranoid right-wingers that "the muslamics" will be sneaking it through Parliament any day now.
- A professional association of lawyers (which also has no legal standing in the UK) has recently issued guidance to help lawyers write wills of this kind when clients ask for it.
All that being said, I would condemn people who choose to discriminate against their female relatives based on their backward religion.
Yeah lay off the Faux News mate, can imagine all the islamophobes foaming at mouth at this non-story.
u took it out of context read again. British law allows people to say what everyone gets and what they can't by following both islamic law too. people do actually get what they deserve
there is nothing wrong in this. all this does is allow people to leave what is leave out favoritism and give to who what is in their rights. Unlike with british law.
What 'british law' exactly is it that you think prevents this?
All that has happened is that guidance has been issued on how to write wills following British Law. It hasn't changed the law at all.
Jump to: