If the result is a draw, the chance is @3.50 which is quite large, even in tomorrow's match both will have the same match.
I will assume Napoli can finish this match well then it is certainly more in the favourite, including I may choose Napoli as the bet later.
Of course it will be fierce and exciting for us to see the match but Napoli have a 60% chance to win.
But that's my prediction for tomorrow between 1-2 or 0-1
Interesting, you really make the odds a benchmark that might seem easy to bet on. Meanwhile, in reality it is not that easy and odds really can't be used as a full benchmark. See how the odds for the match in ucl during the first leg of Salzburg v Bayern Munich with odds (1 - 8.00) (X - 5.00) (2 - 1.36) and the result was a draw @5.00 and also, in uel yesterday in the match between Barcelona v Galatasay with odds (1 - 1.14) (X - 8.50) (2 - 17.00) and the result is a draw @8.50. In fact, these are odds that are bigger than this match and it shows that odds cannot be fully used as a benchmark and taking into account the conditions of the teams that have been discussed previously the possibility of a draw can still occur. But indeed, Napoli have a chance to win and I admit that, but if it is like this then I personally will choose other options in the bet like both teams to score, asian handicap, total goals and maybe other options.
I never really got into the other options. When I was younger, we had our first ever official wagering and that meant that we basically got to wager on sports and it only had moneyline, which meant you had to say either team A wins or draw or Team B wins, those were the only three options and there was nothing else. Soon after that the total goals happened, which is okay.
However aside from that, I do not gamble on anything else because I am not used to it. Like all those "there will be more than 8.5 corners in this game" type of bets never really made sense to me. Napoli will win this game if you ask me, maybe they won't and I will lose, but that's what I am going to wager on.