Pages:
Author

Topic: It's Illegal to Feed the Homeless in Florida... WTF? - page 3. (Read 3512 times)

legendary
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1006
I posted about this on one of my own forums and an American friend posted this image she found:

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It baffles me how you immediately turn this into something political. The article says the people violated a city ordinance which "bans the public sharing of food." Is this a passive-aggressive way of stopping people from feeding the homeless? Maybe. But it has nothing to do with Republicans, especially considering the mayor of Ft. Lauderdale is a Democrat (not to mention one who opposes same-sex marriage... Uh Oh! http://www.browardbeat.com/fort-lauderdale-mayor-harmed-by-anti-lgbt-vote/).

Can't share food in public, what do you think this sis, a free country? if you think this ordinance is about sharing food and not criminalizing homelessness, you're a bit naive not to see the politics of it.  Roll Eyes
The law is not about sharing food in public, it is about distributing it in a way that people assume it is safe to consume. There are regulations regarding the distribution of food in order to help keep consumers safe from food borne illnesses that can be very harmful and that consumers have little other way to protect themselves against

Oh please, that's a bunch of bullshit.  The whole purpose of the law, just like the ones making it illegal for homeless people to congregate in certain places at certain times, is that if we make it difficult\impossible for them to eat or sleep here, they will go somewhere else.  That is the only purpose of the law, get the homeless people to go somewhere else since it would be politically untenable to simply kill them.

 Politically untenable?  I would have thought morally, legally or even perhaps spiritually but politically?


Politically in that laws are passed by politicians.  Morally:   Obviously, if you are find taking food from a starving person you don't care about morals.  Legal:  Well if you pass a law, then it is obviously legal.  Spiritually:  I don't think that enters into their thought process. 
To clarify what I meant, obviously killing them was an exaggeration, passing these types of laws are "good" for a politician because they "solve" the homeless problem (look see?  There are no more homeless people hanging around in our town).  But, they don't do so in an unpopular way;  we aren't saying it is illegal to be poor (that would cost us votes), we say we are doing it for safety or some other such reason.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It baffles me how you immediately turn this into something political. The article says the people violated a city ordinance which "bans the public sharing of food." Is this a passive-aggressive way of stopping people from feeding the homeless? Maybe. But it has nothing to do with Republicans, especially considering the mayor of Ft. Lauderdale is a Democrat (not to mention one who opposes same-sex marriage... Uh Oh! http://www.browardbeat.com/fort-lauderdale-mayor-harmed-by-anti-lgbt-vote/).

Can't share food in public, what do you think this sis, a free country? if you think this ordinance is about sharing food and not criminalizing homelessness, you're a bit naive not to see the politics of it.  Roll Eyes
The law is not about sharing food in public, it is about distributing it in a way that people assume it is safe to consume. There are regulations regarding the distribution of food in order to help keep consumers safe from food borne illnesses that can be very harmful and that consumers have little other way to protect themselves against

Oh please, that's a bunch of bullshit.  The whole purpose of the law, just like the ones making it illegal for homeless people to congregate in certain places at certain times, is that if we make it difficult\impossible for them to eat or sleep here, they will go somewhere else.  That is the only purpose of the law, get the homeless people to go somewhere else since it would be politically untenable to simply kill them.

 Politically untenable?  I would have thought morally, legally or even perhaps spiritually but politically?
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
The law is not about sharing food in public, it is about distributing it in a way that people assume it is safe to consume. There are regulations regarding the distribution of food in order to help keep consumers safe from food borne illnesses that can be very harmful and that consumers have little other way to protect themselves against

These regulations obviously affect the homeless disproportionately more than anyone else. Besides, you know what else can be very harmful for these "consumers"? Not eating.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It baffles me how you immediately turn this into something political. The article says the people violated a city ordinance which "bans the public sharing of food." Is this a passive-aggressive way of stopping people from feeding the homeless? Maybe. But it has nothing to do with Republicans, especially considering the mayor of Ft. Lauderdale is a Democrat (not to mention one who opposes same-sex marriage... Uh Oh! http://www.browardbeat.com/fort-lauderdale-mayor-harmed-by-anti-lgbt-vote/).

Can't share food in public, what do you think this sis, a free country? if you think this ordinance is about sharing food and not criminalizing homelessness, you're a bit naive not to see the politics of it.  Roll Eyes
The law is not about sharing food in public, it is about distributing it in a way that people assume it is safe to consume. There are regulations regarding the distribution of food in order to help keep consumers safe from food borne illnesses that can be very harmful and that consumers have little other way to protect themselves against

Oh please, that's a bunch of bullshit.  The whole purpose of the law, just like the ones making it illegal for homeless people to congregate in certain places at certain times, is that if we make it difficult\impossible for them to eat or sleep here, they will go somewhere else.  That is the only purpose of the law, get the homeless people to go somewhere else since it would be politically untenable to simply kill them.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Wait a minute here...
 The police didn't break his arm, drop kick or tazer him?  He's not in a coma fighting for his life?  This has to be a phony story.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It baffles me how you immediately turn this into something political. The article says the people violated a city ordinance which "bans the public sharing of food." Is this a passive-aggressive way of stopping people from feeding the homeless? Maybe. But it has nothing to do with Republicans, especially considering the mayor of Ft. Lauderdale is a Democrat (not to mention one who opposes same-sex marriage... Uh Oh! http://www.browardbeat.com/fort-lauderdale-mayor-harmed-by-anti-lgbt-vote/).

Can't share food in public, what do you think this sis, a free country? if you think this ordinance is about sharing food and not criminalizing homelessness, you're a bit naive not to see the politics of it.  Roll Eyes
The law is not about sharing food in public, it is about distributing it in a way that people assume it is safe to consume. There are regulations regarding the distribution of food in order to help keep consumers safe from food borne illnesses that can be very harmful and that consumers have little other way to protect themselves against
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It baffles me how you immediately turn this into something political. The article says the people violated a city ordinance which "bans the public sharing of food." Is this a passive-aggressive way of stopping people from feeding the homeless? Maybe. But it has nothing to do with Republicans, especially considering the mayor of Ft. Lauderdale is a Democrat (not to mention one who opposes same-sex marriage... Uh Oh! http://www.browardbeat.com/fort-lauderdale-mayor-harmed-by-anti-lgbt-vote/).

Can't share food in public, what do you think this sis, a free country? if you think this ordinance is about sharing food and not criminalizing homelessness, you're a bit naive not to see the politics of it.  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
helping others is a virtue, especially to help people who really need it, why it is considered a criminal and should be imprisoned for such acts, man was created to complement each other, man was created with the advantages and disadvantages of each, with the advantages and the shortage is expected to man can be complementary, rather than mutually between one and despise the other.

States should facilitate citizens who wanted to help his brother, I think the state was supposed to be a very active role to help the homeless in the country, for example by making laws to help the homeless, help the more I agree, if not in money, but help the more to aid training to hone their skills so that they can get a decent job ...  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
Official Zeitcoin community ambassador

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It baffles me how you immediately turn this into something political. The article says the people violated a city ordinance which "bans the public sharing of food." Is this a passive-aggressive way of stopping people from feeding the homeless? Maybe. But it has nothing to do with Republicans, especially considering the mayor of Ft. Lauderdale is a Democrat (not to mention one who opposes same-sex marriage... Uh Oh! http://www.browardbeat.com/fort-lauderdale-mayor-harmed-by-anti-lgbt-vote/).
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/05/feeding-homeless-arrests/18529709/

TL;DR A 90-year-old man who runs a non-profit dedicated to helping homeless people was arrested in Fort Lauderdale for violating a new ordinance that makes giving food to homeless people illegal. He faces 6 months in prison and a $500 fine.

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.

It doesn't make it illegal to feed the homeless. It imposes some restrictions on how and where you can do it. But even then, I agree that this makes little sense, and the way it was enforced makes it even worse. Guess the police have nothing better to do than going after the dangerous 90 year old pastor that feeds the homeless. By the way, why create another thread for this story? There are already 2 or 3 others.
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
It's been making the rounds on my FB newsfeed
insane, one of the many reasons why the US baffles so many of us....
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/05/feeding-homeless-arrests/18529709/

TL;DR A 90-year-old man who runs a non-profit dedicated to helping homeless people was arrested in Fort Lauderdale for violating a new ordinance that makes giving food to homeless people illegal. He faces 6 months in prison and a $500 fine.

It baffles me how a 'republican' state like Florida allows the passage of a law making private charity to the homeless illegal, but republicans are constantly up in arms about the government giving handouts to poor people and how the poor are just leeches on the productive members of society. If private charities want to help people, don't make it illegal.

This law is bullshit.
Pages:
Jump to: