Pages:
Author

Topic: 'John Abraham ≈ naim027' Coincidence or Connection? - page 3. (Read 4091 times)

legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 966
In Search of Incredible
I imagine the message he sent me is similar to what you received, though what I got was a long-winded explanation as to why he and naim027 aren't alt accounts.
Was it just a long text message, or was there any kind of evidence (screenshot of conversation)? It has become a failed attempt from him to remove the negative feedbacks as none of you have changed the decisions.

It seems those that left negative trust on his account received the PM.
naim027 was trying to unban his account by sending PM's to moderators and administrators. Now he (John Abraham) is trying to convince three of you to clean his account reputation. We shouldn't forget that we are dealing with a liar and storyteller

While you guys can try to match up to much data with other accounts, The truth is those are not my alts.
After being exposed, the confession has zero value.
This is not only a confession but also an explanation of the story. Yes, I own all four accounts. I was Evading a ban. I tried to pretend like a new user.
rby
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 611
Brotherhood is love
No, I got a PM from him earlier today and in it he mentioned that he was going to contact you.  I imagine the message he sent me is similar to what you received, though what I got was a long-winded explanation as to why he and naim027 aren't alt accounts.

I deleted it without reading it.

Buzz!
Poker player, did you really do that? If actually you did will I say you were very unfair to him or will I say you were kind of mean or wicked to him. Whatever language I use doesn't really matter because you reserve the right to doing what pleases you but I feel that you went too far or you took it personal
I understand that some forum users whose records are not clean are always afraid of JollyGood, do you want to take over from JG? Grin I know too well that if such message was sent to JG, he'll atleast read even if he will feel indifferent.


By the way, I don't want people presenting their arguments for removing a tag being delivered via PM.  Everything should be out in the open so that the community can weigh in--at least that's the way I see it.

Some matters relating to this are better discussed in private because it is easy to convince one person than to convince a multitude. However, John Abraham taking the lane of PM at this juncture of the matter is not acceptable. It is late to use the pm. The community is very much aware of this matter and many people have discussed here. If Abraham has more evidences to vindicate himself, he should drop them here.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Am I the only person to whom John Abraham, i.e. naim027 has sent a PM regarding feedback?
No, I got a PM from him earlier today and in it he mentioned that he was going to contact you.  I imagine the message he sent me is similar to what you received, though what I got was a long-winded explanation as to why he and naim027 aren't alt accounts.

There's enough evidence in this thread that points to the two accounts being controlled by the same person--at least enough for me to feel comfortable tagging the John Abraham one.  The moderators might feel differently or require a higher standard of proof, but there's always been that disconnect between them and DT members. 

By the way, I don't want people presenting their arguments for removing a tag being delivered via PM.  Everything should be out in the open so that the community can weigh in--at least that's the way I see it.  So John Abraham, if you want to share additional info please do it here.  Nobody's forcing you to, but I'm requesting that you do.
Well, I also received a PM from the John Abraham account. It seems those that left negative trust on his account received the PM.

I also think working behind the scenes via PM to provide information or present arguments is not best practice if the objective is to try to have feedback/trust either removed or revised. When presenting a case if everything is out in the open for all to see there can be no doubt about what is going on when questions and answers are put forward. In these types of matters the community should (as you said) be able to weight in.

I will not reply to the PM but also will state that if the John Abraham account has anything to add then he should post it here for all to read.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
No, I got a PM from him earlier today and in it he mentioned that he was going to contact you.  I imagine the message he sent me is similar to what you received, though what I got was a long-winded explanation as to why he and naim027 aren't alt accounts.

I deleted it without reading it. 3 red tags and two other neutrals that are almost negative because they say they don't trust him, are enough for me.

I am open to review of my feedback, especially if evidence is presented, but I am not willing to be messed with, especially by someone who is especially skilled at manipulating.
legendary
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6809
Cashback 15%
Am I the only person to whom John Abraham, i.e. naim027 has sent a PM regarding feedback?
No, I got a PM from him earlier today and in it he mentioned that he was going to contact you.  I imagine the message he sent me is similar to what you received, though what I got was a long-winded explanation as to why he and naim027 aren't alt accounts.

There's enough evidence in this thread that points to the two accounts being controlled by the same person--at least enough for me to feel comfortable tagging the John Abraham one.  The moderators might feel differently or require a higher standard of proof, but there's always been that disconnect between them and DT members. 

By the way, I don't want people presenting their arguments for removing a tag being delivered via PM.  Everything should be out in the open so that the community can weigh in--at least that's the way I see it.  So John Abraham, if you want to share additional info please do it here.  Nobody's forcing you to, but I'm requesting that you do.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Am I the only person to whom John Abraham, i.e. naim027 has sent a PM regarding feedback?
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
As the John Abraham is no longer in a signature campaign the person using the account will probably let it fade away soon because if it cannot generate any income (or money) for the person controlling the account, it will be of no use.

That at the very least is one positive to appear from this thread that naim027 was posting using strong religious beliefs as a way of conducting himself as well posting complete paradoxical explanations certain opposite conduct. Add to the compulsive lying and attempted manipulations along with the using of profanities then it is a reminder of the reasons why he was distrusted by many members (and it was not just because he had many alt-accounts).
rby
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 611
Brotherhood is love
Royse777 ≈ Cratoon ≈ John Abraham ≈ naim027 now? Grin
You really think I have time for signature spamming, account farming and all these shits?

Royse777 must be a superman or a bot for him to be naim027, John Abraham, AnotherAlt, cryptoSoul, Cratoon and one other account I can't remember it's name. It was used by naim027 for ban appeal. Someone who can farm these accounts is really someone who has no other things to do apart from posting and applying in signature campaigns and not someone like Royse777 who manages upto 5 different campaigns and also manage bounties and other services.

I avoided the drama in the reputation board for few days, before I could return more dramas unfolded. I see that Poker player has tagged what seems to be an official account of Paradice casino. Following the conversation allowed me to understand that paradice themselves admitted that naim027 is among people that uses the account for official purposes. Which I think there is nothing wrong with that. Because business if registered is a separate entity from people controlling it. A brand can sue and be sued.

But naim027 or whoever was using the account to post outside the paradice thread, involved in many threads in the forum where their business name was not mentioned is where the problem lies. The official status of the account has been humiliated and as such it lacks the capacity to vouch for either naim027 or John Abraham.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 672
Top Crypto Casino
Anyway are we talking about John Abraham ≈ naim027 or Cratoon ≈ John Abraham ≈ naim027 or Royse777 ≈ Cratoon ≈ John Abraham ≈ naim027 now? Grin

I don't know about niam027 or the others in the list except Royse. Royse is one of the best people I ever met on the forum, and you're somehow trying to say that he's somehow an alt of those people. I totally disagree with your statement and found it totally useless. Royse is a very honest campaign manager and I have worked with him on many campaigns, and I can vouch for his honesty as a campaign manager. He does his job with complete transparency and has been playing his role as one of the best campaign managers for the forum.

You mean that when he was banned, apart from working for CasinoCritique he was also working for you?

Even if someone is banned on the forum that person can work in a team as a freelancer and no rules say that a person who is banned on this forum could not work for someone outside the forum. If I'm not wrong then a banned user can't work on this forum from his account or from an alt-account, and he/she can work with others without any problem if the task is outside the forum.

Like Royse already said that the guy is a member of his campaign management team and his work is to manage spreadsheets of the campaigns. There isn't any problem if someone is doing that, and it's Royse honestly and generous nature that he shared the thing with forum members. He could have hide the thing like other people do, but he said the truth which only few people who are transparent can say without any fear. If someone is not wrong then that person doesn't have any fear to tell a truth.

I'm pretty sure that Royse isn't favoring anyone and is telling the truth only, but it's a fact that most of the times the people who tell the truth face some type of criticism and hatred. And, I would also request the members on the thread to not have grudges with each other.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Blah, blah, blah.

This is my answer:

That is a good answer considering the circumstances Grin

I know Royse777 had a good relationship with naim027 and probably still does, but the rest of us can't view the latter through the former's eyes.  Homeboy naim027's actions and words made in public are all we can go by, and it does seem like he's probably got a stable of alt accounts that have yet to be sniffed out.  Luckily the forum detectives can be as persistent and focused as an Adderall-sniffing, crack smoking fiend who can only pay extremely close attention to one thing, i.e., one or more of them is gonna be laser-focused on finding those alt accounts.  And they will, I've no doubt.
From time to time some alt-account or another belonging to naim027 will eventually be found out and tagged, you are right about that. Whatever the real relationship between them it does not interest many of us here, they both can trust each other as much as they want but most of distrust one because of his compulsive lying and farmed alt-accounts while the other one has outgrown his ego and shown levels of increasing narcissism as he began managing multiple signature campaigns.

Personally, I trust neither of them.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 966
In Search of Incredible
Too many coincidences...
You may find it as coincidence, but naim027 had removed me from his trust list after a few weeks. Where he was in the trust list of 'Cratoon' until he (naim027) lost his reputation. Not to mention, 'Cratoon' account was belongs to 'naim027' during then.

Both handled our BitcoinTalk profile. John handled our profile from 2020 to 2021, and Naim handled it from 2021 to 2023.

'naim027' stopped trusting himself from 'Cratoon' account after receiving a lot of negative feedback Cheesy. Maybe the account still belongs to naim027. He was using his trust list as the way he needed it to get the attention of the DT members.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
Naim027 added Mahdirakib that same week:

https://loyce.club/trust/2022-02-19_Sat_05.07h/1187984.html

Quote
naim027 Trusts these users' judgement

9. NEW Mahdirakib (Trust: neutral) (272 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Naim027's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW Cratoon (Trust: awaiting update) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Too many coincidences...




*Edit*

week 161 - (the week prior) naim027 adds ~90 UID's to their distrust list taking their DT distrust list to exactly 100.

I believe naim027 then set about a slow build of DT votes to get themself to DT 1 by layering votes to eventually get themselves to ten votes without drawing attention to themselves
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I am surprised how forum members still raise their fingers after a business's official statement.
An "official statement" from someone without credibility has no value.

Quote
Trust list for: Cratoon (Trust: neutral) (100 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2022-11-12_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

Cratoon Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Removed naim027 (Trust: +0 / =2 / -11) (523 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Cratoon Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

Cratoon's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~Cratoon's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.
Hmm... funny that...
I'm more interested in when he added the account: February 2022. Cratoon just posted that "Naim" handled the "Cratoon" account back then:
John resigned on 26th March 2021. While Naim worked with us till 5th May 2023.
Both handled our BitcoinTalk profile. John handled our profile from 2020 to 2021, and Naim handled it from 2021 to 2023.
So he included his own account on Cratoon's Trust list. That's sockpuppet voting for DT1, even though his account was nowhere near DT1.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 966
In Search of Incredible
I don't want to engage with forum users personal issues with each others.
I assume it is 'naim027' who has told you that this topic has been created for personal issues. A few more forum members have also believed it as the way naim027 tried to tell the story in 'Mahdirakib Insight' thread. It is his (naim027) poor mentality that he thinks I created this thread for personal issue. But believe it or not, I don't have any personal issue with him.


Mahdirakib, I've seen your previous posts related to Naim027's exposure. I respect that you keep catching him; maybe you have better reasons for spying on him.
I think it is necessary to give the answer of this now. I was trying to find the connection between 'naim027' and Crypt0S0ul after watching this post of 'morvillz7z'. Initially I couldn't find any valid connection between those accounts as I was only checking his name style (Dic3L0v3r, Crypt0S0ul, Sil3ntS0ul). He was using '0' instead of 'o' in the name of those accounts. I had sent a PM to 'LoyceV' by including those information. Then I found a real connection between 'AnotherAlt' and 'Dic3L0v3r' when I checked the addresses.

I wasn't checking anything about naim027 after that. And I had no reason to spy on 'John Abraham'. But I was a bit curious after reading this post of John Abraham in gambling section.

As I said earlier, I remember I saw Mahdirakib and Panjul07 in the Betcoin Competition thread. I remember I checked the contest result for a few weeks. Most of the time I saw the winner was Panjul07 and Mahdirakib.

I'm highly active in the gambling board, but I wasn't familiar with the name 'John Abraham' when I participated in those contests. I started to investigate on 'John Abraham' account by being curious. At first, I checked his post history and noticed he wasn't active in the forum when we (Panjul07 and me) were participating on those contests regularly. Then I started to check the transaction of 'John Abraham' Bitcoin address and found the connection with 'naim027' Bitcoin address.

I had also sent an email to whirlwind.money support by requesting the information of the forum member who was sending Bitcoin to 'naim027' address. But they haven't replied to my email (email screenshot). Finally I created this topic so that the forum members can find out the more connections between 'naim027' and 'John Abraham' account. Some forum members have posted enough evidence in this thread, but 'John Abraham' (I mean naim027) is still trying to deny it by telling lies and with baseless replies.

~snip~
'Sil3ntS0ul' is telegram display name of 'naim027'.
legendary
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6809
Cashback 15%
The ban evasion rule only make sense for accounts that is in use for personal reason - when it's personal accounts.
Nope. For that to apply, moderators would have to go through the entire account history and evaluate each individual post to see if it was made for personal or business reasons. Obviously, that would be impossible.
Mmm.  That argument of personal vs. business accounts befuddles me completely, as I've never seen any such interpretation of the rule regarding ban evasion being presented before--and likely for good reason, too.  Unless I'm reading things wrong, it is always the person behind the banned account who is banned, and thus any accounts under that person's control are also banned regardless of what the accounts are used for. 

If I'm not mistaken, I've seen campaign/bounty managers receive temp bans and other such individuals who have urgent forum business to attend to on a regular basis, and there was never any question that an alt account could NOT be created in order to deal with that business.  I recall pleas to the mods to lift such bans, as whoever those members were couldn't communicate with the people they needed to (it was a long time ago).

I know Royse777 had a good relationship with naim027 and probably still does, but the rest of us can't view the latter through the former's eyes.  Homeboy naim027's actions and words made in public are all we can go by, and it does seem like he's probably got a stable of alt accounts that have yet to be sniffed out.  Luckily the forum detectives can be as persistent and focused as an Adderall-sniffing, crack smoking fiend who can only pay extremely close attention to one thing, i.e., one or more of them is gonna be laser-focused on finding those alt accounts.  And they will, I've no doubt.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218
💲🏎️💨🚓
Naim027 and I worked together for a long time, from 2020 to mid-2021, for a casino. I know him as Sil3ntS0ul. From our long working period together, we have had a good relationship with each other.

No one appears to have searched for Sil3ntS0ul so here goes:

https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Sil3ntS0ul

Congratulations to the Winners of the Regatta!🏆⛵️🍾

1 $21,80 HIKO
2 $21,80 marina1386
3 $19,08 Feriyandi
4️⃣ $19,08 Tinavu
5️⃣ $19,08 Sil3ntS0ul
6️⃣ $16,35 ACTPOHABT
7️⃣ $16,35 Nasrin
8️⃣ $16,35 xxx555
9️⃣ $13,63 petya
🔟 $13,63 aloxa
And 10 more winners! 🏆🏆🏆


Congratulations to the Winners of our 8th Regatta!🏆⛵️🍾
1 $12,93 Zuzu
2 $12,93 Laim83
3 $11,32 Salut
4 $11,32 marina1386
5 $11,32 lulya
6 $9,70 AndreiMironov
7 $9,70 Aleksandris
8 $9,70 Galusik
9 $8,08 Sil3ntS0ul
10 $8,08 ravi859[/size]

And 10 more winners! 🏆🏆🏆

There's no rhyme nore reason why that specific name is used, however, the OP / UID that makes the post is Cratoon (the OP of the thread).

The thread ( ✅ Paradice.in | 🍀 Provably Fair 🎲 | Rain☔| 30 sec Faucet | 1% House Edge ) is Merited by naim027 (2) a full two years *after* the thread was created.




Cratoon [BPIP]



John Abraham [BPIP]  



changes their password 48 hours after Cratoon




JollyGood, I think you are overreacting. I don't think I did not give you enough evidence. You seem too quick to tag my account without even investigating the information I left for the questions you asked.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55483764
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5276629

This was me when I was working with the company. I feel lucky that I used my name a couple of times while I was handling their representative account. Feel free to ask them at the time when, I (John) and Sil3ntS0ul worked there. After this response, I will not deal with you anymore. The community will judge your negative feedback.

More clearly, cratoon account represents paradice and I was in charge of the account when I worked for them from 2020 to mid-2021

Miraculously, cratoon has showered you with merits *after* your no longer controlled the account as observed by decodx in this post.




Funny how John Abraham's only DT distrust is of me:

Quote
Trust list for: John Abraham (Trust: neutral) (538 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2023-06-10_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

John Abraham Trusts these users' judgement:
1. NEW philipma1957 (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (4793 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW Royse777 (Trust: +17 / =6 / -2) (2595 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. LoyceV (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (60) 13331 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +29 / =3 / -0) (5315 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. BitcoinGirl.Club (Trust: +1 / =3 / -0) (1445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. NEW Hhampuz (Trust: +116 / =3 / -0) (4727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. NEW hugeblack (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (2757 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. coinlocket$ (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1498 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

John Abraham Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. NEW ~Timelord2067 (Trust: +14 / =11 / -0) (1081 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

John Abraham's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~John Abraham's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

Code:
~John Abraham
~Cratoon




https://loyce.club/trust/2022-11-12_Sat_05.07h/1695987.html

Quote
Trust list for: Cratoon (Trust: neutral) (100 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2022-11-12_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

Cratoon Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Removed naim027 (Trust: +0 / =2 / -11) (523 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Cratoon Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

Cratoon's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~Cratoon's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

Hmm... funny that...






legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 547
So you are telling us that you don't know Bengali? Interesting. Where did you get this screenshot from?
I'm no expert, but it looks Bengali to me.
In which sense does it look like this is a screenshot? It might be. But I don't know if this is a screenshot. I don't remember the page/group name, but I found it from a Facebook group/page.

I already explained this. I sold my BTC for Paypal.

Quote from: John Abraham
That's all I heard from my friend. I don't use PayPal.
https://ninjastic.space/post/61818297

So, You are telling me; If I said I don't use Payoneer in the past, I should not use that for the rest of my life. Isn't it?

No. I'm telling you that you claimed not to have PayPal AFTER your alleged transaction with naim027. Which means you lied in at least one of your two statements.
You are twisting it. I believe you understand the difference between "Don't have PayPal and Don't use PayPal". I don't use PayPal Regularly. I use it for some special needs!

...So, I just try to think logically and with a positive mindset....

Or, for example, he claims to have sent a portion of the earnings from signature campaigns to his personal Binance account, but he has not shown a single transaction of this kind on the blockchain. If there's nothing to hide, why not share ALL the evidence?

I feel like you wrote it with a positive mindset. I won't mind sharing something with you personally. Expect my dm after posting this.

It's funny how people confess to crimes and don't realize it. Not exactly a crime but a clear violation of the rules. I mean, when naim027 was banned for plagiarism, not only ban evaded with his alts AnotherAlt, Crypt0S0ul, also with Paradice.in account Cratoon.
I don't know if I have answered you in any of my posts yet. But I saw the tag you left on Paradice's official representative account. What makes you think your tag correctly uses the feedback system? The account has been in Naim's and Seva's control since I left Paradice in 2021. Paradice management is not active in this forum. Moreover, Seva said he had no idea if Naim was banned from the forum. So, ask yourself if your tag is justified or not.

Since you already confirmed the suspected alt accounts have had access to this account in the past, who's to say they're not behind it now?

I don't think they check the replies. I would ask; does this forum account still always stay logged in after changing the password? I don't know. I haven't tried this in my account. I am surprised how forum members still raise their fingers after a business's official statement. Yet, you guys suspect a business for an Individual person who left their platform.

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
I can understand it most probably would be account strength in the hope of getting more merits for when he took the account to Legendary but why would he do it now when he is far from that goal?
I am not sure why that surprises you so much, that someone who is far away from Legendary rank (activity wise) wants to reach that 1k merit mark asap, or that he wants to keep farming merit. I mean, we all know more merit earned in 120 days often means better signature campaign so its only natural for account farmer to keep on farming merit in every possble way he can, and he became pretty decent at that. 
The Whirlwind signature campaign pays $125 with avatar for Snr Members and it moves to $150 for Legendary therefore I overlooked the crucial part. No doubt it would probably be the driving factor in this game of building up as many accounts as possible to be farmed to be used for either signature campaigns or for nefarious purposes.

Hello.
I am Seva from Paradice.in
Naim sent me a DM asking me to say something here.
I can only say that Naim and John worked for Paradice.in
John resigned on 26th March 2021. While Naim worked with us till 5th May 2023.
Both handled our BitcoinTalk profile. John handled our profile from 2020 to 2021, and Naim handled it from 2021 to 2023.
Naim asked me at least to say that they worked for us. Yes, they worked for us, and we never suspected they could be the same person. During their working time, they worked at different times while our support agents tried not to overlap.
A timely intervention from you therefore thank you for doing it (even if it was at the request of naim027) but all you have added by your own volition is that as far as you are concerned naim027 and John Abraham could effectively be the same person.

To clarify some things, John has been working with us since 2020 and resigned on March 2021. Naim worked for us from 2020 to 2023, and we had to remove him.

While we don't want to reveal anyone's nationality, John Speaks the native local languages of mine and the CEO.

John was getting more than 3x Salary than Naim when he resigned. It's not a good business for someone to leave the high-salary job and continue doing the same job for a 3x low salary. I don't think John could be Naim.

I have no idea if Naim was banned and if he has multiple accounts. I asked him today, and he said yes, he has. I am not an expert on Bitcointalk. We hire workers for their job. We don't know their personal life. This is non of our business being a crypto casino.

I am here on request of Naim. I am not here to prove anything. I just gave my statement, and it's official. If you don't believe me, I am sorry. I don't have time to convince anyone.
Another timely intervention from you once again at the request of naim027. In your opinion naim027 and John Abraham are not alt-accounts, we read it.

In theory: If anyone ask me to recommend Nain027 if he add me on his CV for reference then I don't think I am going to tell them anything negative as he worked very well in my business. I have no complain for the job he does for my service.

Oof. This guy obviously has no problem lying to anybody at any given time -- I'd think that would weigh on your decision to act as a reference for him. What would happen in the case that you vouched for him and then he went on to screw over a future employer?
The way naim027 and his alt-accounts have been operating in the forum, it seems at some point highly probable (if not inevitable) naim027 and his alt-accounts will do something like that but stranger things have happened.


Funny how this turned out to be somewhat prophetic:

I will create 100 more accounts as soon as I can.

I am certain he has more accounts currently at work but he'll be a bit more clever in masking them from hereon out.
Now that it is there in pixels on screen who can deny he ever said it? Having said that he is a compulsive liar and chief manipulator therefore would naim027 really stop at 100 alt-accounts or was he bluffing and would happily stop at 5,10 or 15?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Well, okay, let's imagine for instance that Tether comes to the forum and opens its topic to share news and answer questions. They hire one representative after another and this goes on for some time. Then it's revealed anyhow that one of those guys they hired was a ban evader during he worked for Tether as their representative.
That's the opposite case, and I guess it can be handled on a per-case basis. What Royse777 was suggesting is that a banned user can continue posting using Tether's account. I don't think that's allowed.
Or maybe Tether in this case should just be held liable for their employees' spam, and be banned forever. I wouldn't miss them.
Pages:
Jump to: