Pages:
Author

Topic: John Nash created bitcoin - page 19. (Read 22259 times)

legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
February 02, 2017, 02:06:39 PM
#67
In my opinion is less likely that the creator of bitcoin is an american or european. Probably a chinese or japanese. The name Satoshi Nakamoto indicates that as well and we all know that asians are born with IT skills. lol No offense here..

nope
analysts have looked at the details and spotted he is british background. and times zones of activity do not relate to asian daylight hours

the 'satoshi" seems to have emanated from a cryptographic game about anonymity.. this game existed way before bitcoin, which it seems bitcoins creator adopted that pseudonym after the game but before bitcoin due to an interest in that game.
that game was not asian founded either, but the target of the game had the name satoshi.(games target is not the bitcoin creator although both entities decided on same name)

its much like saying if i named myself franky. does that mean im german by default due to to the origins of the name.. nope
its my interest in the name frank that has many wordplay possibilities behind it, as the reason i chose it. one of which relates to germany.

but with all that said.. all indications and rational thought show that satoshi's skill set, dsires, motives and analytical info of what we can establish, the bitcoin creator is NOT john nash.. nor is satoshi japanese.. nor is satoshi craig wright either
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1035
Not your Keys, Not your Bitcoins
February 02, 2017, 01:55:41 PM
#66
In my opinion is less likely that the creator of bitcoin is an american or european. Probably a chinese or japanese. The name Satoshi Nakamoto indicates that as well and we all know that asians are born with IT skills. lol No offense here..
hero member
Activity: 555
Merit: 507
February 02, 2017, 01:44:43 PM
#65
I think no one expects the spanish inquisition made Bitcoin because

sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
February 02, 2017, 01:29:37 PM
#64
trainwreck.
all you care about is clickbaiting your medium article.

many people have talked about john nash YEARS ago.
you have not added anything else to the argument apart from endless "did you read it did you read it" click begging

shut up about the click begs of wanting people to click your article.
the content of that article offers NO better info then whats already been discussed before.


You haven't read the article you talking about.  And what you are saying is wholly untrue.

Nobody brought anything from Nash on ideal money to the community but me. 

And so what is this poster doing, filling this thread up with their trash, talking about something in which they are both observably wrong about and completely ignorant about.

What is so valueless about your life that you will spend time commenting on something that you know absolutely nothing about?
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
February 02, 2017, 12:49:50 PM
#63
trainwreck.
all you care about is clickbaiting your medium article.

many people have talked about john nash YEARS ago.
you have not added anything else to the argument apart from endless "did you read it did you read it" click begging

shut up about the click begs of wanting people to click your article.
the content of that article offers NO better info then whats already been discussed before.

sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
February 02, 2017, 10:54:12 AM
#62
I did not read it nor heard the provided materials. Anyone care to give a tl;dr? Besides that i do not care if he invented it or not. Since he is dead i would be even kind of glad, because he can not be used to manipulate the minds of people.
John Nash got the idea for ideal money when we went crazy and was forcibly confined in psychiatric care. 50 years later he started to tour the world talking about how an international e-currency would take power from central banks to print money. He also explained in great detail, how this will all unfold, and what will be the result-and exactly how we should move forward with bitcoin.

It's been a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I'm so excited about this conspiracy theory, I like John Nash so much that he can do something with it.
Yes I agree because there are not valid proof about it, so it is still called conspiracy
the other people there were said created bitcoin was Craig Wright but it is still conspiracy too.
 I don't know who are true the most important bitcoin becomed more popular right now.
did you, or did you not read the article or listen to my explanation of it before you made this judgement?
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 300
January 29, 2017, 07:59:48 AM
#61
I did not read it nor heard the provided materials. Anyone care to give a tl;dr? Besides that i do not care if he invented it or not. Since he is dead i would be even kind of glad, because he can not be used to manipulate the minds of people.
John Nash got the idea for ideal money when we went crazy and was forcibly confined in psychiatric care. 50 years later he started to tour the world talking about how an international e-currency would take power from central banks to print money. He also explained in great detail, how this will all unfold, and what will be the result-and exactly how we should move forward with bitcoin.

It's been a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I'm so excited about this conspiracy theory, I like John Nash so much that he can do something with it.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
February 01, 2017, 12:13:01 AM
#61
I did not read it nor heard the provided materials. Anyone care to give a tl;dr? Besides that i do not care if he invented it or not. Since he is dead i would be even kind of glad, because he can not be used to manipulate the minds of people.
John Nash got the idea for ideal money when we went crazy and was forcibly confined in psychiatric care. 50 years later he started to tour the world talking about how an international e-currency would take power from central banks to print money. He also explained in great detail, how this will all unfold, and what will be the result-and exactly how we should move forward with bitcoin.

It's been a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I'm so excited about this conspiracy theory, I like John Nash so much that he can do something with it.
Yes I agree because there are not valid proof about it, so it is still called conspiracy
the other people there were said created bitcoin was Craig Wright but it is still conspiracy too.
 I don't know who are true the most important bitcoin becomed more popular right now.
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 251
January 29, 2017, 07:56:03 AM
#60

Even if this article was true I don't see its relevance today because Nash has passed and I don't think this will be the last person who might claim or might be labeled Satoshi until the real Satoshi comes out with some hardcore evidence so for me it's irrelevant at this stage because Bitcoin has already come to stay.
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
January 29, 2017, 07:03:24 AM
#59
I am not denying nor supporting this thesis. But I find it is very convenient to call Nash creator of BTC, since he is unfortunately dead.
So there is no way for him to deny or confirm this revelation defectively making him a great candidate to force Satoshi title on him.
Until real Satoshi will reveal himself one day, Nash may be "Tier 1" candidate along with: Adam Back ,Charles Bry, David Chaum
Michael Clear, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Neal J. King, Martti Malmi, Shinichi Mochizuki, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman and Nick Szabo.
 
Did you read the article, or listen to my annotations, or just ignored them and came to spew ignorance.?

there is no need to listen or read anything, if he really created it, just sign the correct block with signature, and we all we will accept it at that point

everything else is just bullshit to ride the notoriety
this isn't proof of satoshi, idiot.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
January 29, 2017, 06:43:34 AM
#58

Even if satoshi would come out now, and say that he is satoshi, if there is no proof, then his whole "satoshi" identity is impossible to prove.
also Satoshi can post something under his account here
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
January 29, 2017, 06:17:33 AM
#57
I think it was Satoshi who created the bitcoin and he named bitcoin smallest unit Satoshi under his name. Thats the most antithetic information i have heard across the internet.

actually satoshi made bitcoin but it wasnt until later that
0.00000001 got 'branded' a satoshi and
0.0000001 got branded a hal

in honor of satoshi and hal, by the community in 2011

then much later
0.000001 got branded a bit
and people even now are trying to give nick names to the other decimal points
copper member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 500
January 29, 2017, 04:30:23 AM
#56
I am not denying nor supporting this thesis. But I find it is very convenient to call Nash creator of BTC, since he is unfortunately dead.
So there is no way for him to deny or confirm this revelation defectively making him a great candidate to force Satoshi title on him.
Until real Satoshi will reveal himself one day, Nash may be "Tier 1" candidate along with: Adam Back ,Charles Bry, David Chaum
Michael Clear, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Neal J. King, Martti Malmi, Shinichi Mochizuki, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman and Nick Szabo.
 
Did you read the article, or listen to my annotations, or just ignored them and came to spew ignorance.?

there is no need to listen or read anything, if he really created it, just sign the correct block with signature, and we all we will accept it at that point

everything else is just bullshit to ride the notoriety

Sadly if it is true that John Nash is the real SN then he cannot sign it from the other world.  Anyway, I do not care about who satoshi is, why would I waste my time researching who he is. 

I do not care so much, I just care who operates BTC

I would care much for this.  Satoshi was the past, so let us leave it as that unless someone just moved that Satoshi's Address or announced a sign message from that address then there is no doubt on that.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 506
January 29, 2017, 03:53:02 AM
#55
I just finished reading everything OP wanted us to read and here is what I've got:

2^100 = 1,267,650,600,228,229,401,496,703,205,376.

Now give me my Nobel prize! Cheesy because I'm him>Satoshi.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 506
January 29, 2017, 03:52:15 AM
#54
I have seen over 5 threads recently with people claiming different names as being "the Bitcoin creators". No matter if that person is a math genius, a genius coder or anything else, unless he shows evidence there is no way you can find out who that person really was. Maybe he is someone VERY smart, a genius that nobody knows about.. And I personally think he will never reveal himself (unless after death he's found to be the one) for security reasons.

I think it was Satoshi who created the bitcoin and he named bitcoin smallest unit Satoshi under his name. Thats the most antithetic information i have heard across the internet. Rest all John Nash etc are just not look real and are false as everyone tries to claim himself as if he is the founder of this great invention.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
January 29, 2017, 03:11:58 AM
#53
I do not care so much, I just care who operates BTC

Im agree with you. it isn't important thing. I think, it is more important than who create this. John Nash must be beyond "name"
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
January 29, 2017, 02:44:44 AM
#52
I am not denying nor supporting this thesis. But I find it is very convenient to call Nash creator of BTC, since he is unfortunately dead.
So there is no way for him to deny or confirm this revelation defectively making him a great candidate to force Satoshi title on him.
Until real Satoshi will reveal himself one day, Nash may be "Tier 1" candidate along with: Adam Back ,Charles Bry, David Chaum
Michael Clear, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Neal J. King, Martti Malmi, Shinichi Mochizuki, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman and Nick Szabo.
 
Did you read the article, or listen to my annotations, or just ignored them and came to spew ignorance.?

there is no need to listen or read anything, if he really created it, just sign the correct block with signature, and we all we will accept it at that point

everything else is just bullshit to ride the notoriety
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
January 29, 2017, 01:54:57 AM
#51
john nash was a maths guy not a code guy... keep trying though

The foundation of computation as we know it came from Alan Turing with his Turing Machine, and he was a mathematician. Some of the older computer science instructors at universities are were mathematics majors because there was no CS majors in their time

I wouldn't put it over a mathematician
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
January 28, 2017, 10:48:31 PM
#50
as it just seems like there is an ulterior motive for this trainwreck to be so desperate to get people to follow and applaud him. it just seems too desperate to just be about medium.com clickbait
Normally I would think you are a troll, but in this case I actually think you are this stupid.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 28, 2017, 09:08:49 PM
#49
john nash was a maths guy not a code guy... keep trying though

I am not saying that John Nash is Satoshi but for the sake of discussion, was it not shown in the early versions of Bitcoin that the code was not really that good? The "developer", Satoshi, probably was not a good coder or might not even be a professional coder. He might really be a math guy who learned to code then created Bitcoin.
Pages:
Jump to: