lol.. dang this trainwreck cant see passed his own nose.
he thinks he has found something big, but doesnt realise that he is like a few years out of date in all his research..
people have already supplied far more stuff than trainwreck has and this john nash ploy of his is not original.
seems he needs to be the one that does more research
Topic: John Nash created bitcoin - page 21. (Read 22259 times)
Few people are saying that the creator of bitcoin is Satoshi.
But now I get to hear that some John Nash is the creator.
Like you have to just post any topic just for increasing your posts
Count. It's very irritating , I am sure that this might
But answered by many but I don't feel that this topic
Needs any explanation.
Thankyou
Nash had understood unbreakable encryption, the solution to all finite games with n players, the value of money in trade, and a design for AI by the time he was 25. Subsequently he fled the US because of his insight he call "ideal money". This was 55 years ago. Then he spent his time quietly at princeton, as the legend goes, scribbling on chalk boards at night. In 1995 he started touring the world explaining that an e-currency with a stably issued supply, is going to asymptotically take power from the central banks and he METHODICALLY explained how this would happen.But now I get to hear that some John Nash is the creator.
Like you have to just post any topic just for increasing your posts
Count. It's very irritating , I am sure that this might
But answered by many but I don't feel that this topic
Needs any explanation.
Thankyou
He left a note on his homepage saying he has come up with something based on new axioms, in which he is afraid to consult other people on, and I quoted that this axiom was that money should be issued in a way that it has a stable value. And he left a note saying he developed a program that could search for the next prime.
He also said he has been purposefully obfuscating his lecture and work, up until at least 2013, out of fear from government reprisal.
Few people are saying that the creator of bitcoin is Satoshi.
But now I get to hear that some John Nash is the creator.
Like you have to just post any topic just for increasing your posts
Count. It's very irritating , I am sure that this might
But answered by many but I don't feel that this topic
Needs any explanation.
Thankyou
But now I get to hear that some John Nash is the creator.
Like you have to just post any topic just for increasing your posts
Count. It's very irritating , I am sure that this might
But answered by many but I don't feel that this topic
Needs any explanation.
Thankyou
Another thread how many people are going to claim he or that is satoshi. Why can't people just digest the fact that satoshi identity will never be told to the world. He shall never ever reveal himself and all those who are claiming that they know satoshi are trying for their ratings to go high. Why do people really need to know the real identity, just move on with life and get on there's more to do than find out his identity.
This thread doesn't claim Nash is satoshi, you mutt.
Another thread how many people are going to claim he or that is satoshi. Why can't people just digest the fact that satoshi identity will never be told to the world. He shall never ever reveal himself and all those who are claiming that they know satoshi are trying for their ratings to go high. Why do people really need to know the real identity, just move on with life and get on there's more to do than find out his identity.
Craig Wright and Andressen wants to split Bitcoin, for that Wright pretends to be Satoshi. Further in Satoshi's hide he will say that BU is not a alt.
the craig wright, andressen, adam back social drama is all orchestrated by coindesk, who has ownership stakes in blockstream(adamback) and bloq(gavin andressen).
if you didnt realise it, andressen is still part of the side you desire to control you, so when you look at the ties to who is paying them(barry silbert(coindesk)). you realise the game being played on you. you might wake up to this fake social drama.
the whole last 2 years of distractions of the r3cked campaigns was to point their own actions in a different direction by making a couple of their own the fall guys so people think they are safe under the control of centralists.
maybe less time being conned reading con artists scripts made to distract you, and instead doing your own research would help you more
Craig Wright and Andressen wants to split Bitcoin, for that Wright pretends to be Satoshi. Further in Satoshi's hide he will say that BU is not a alt.
with Craig Wright claims to be satoshi and the way many newbies, unaware of how bitcoin works, believed him and how the public media such as big news agencies (other than shitty bitcoin new sites) believed the story i expect more and more people come out as being Satoshi candidates either by themselves or by others after the fact.
Josh Nash sounded like a mathematician rather than a creator of bitcoin. If compared to Craig Wright, wright is more reliable than John Nash and If i were to select between the two it would be Wright that I will vote. But as of now neither of the two is Satoshi Nakamoto since they fail to establish enough evidence and proof that they are really the creators of bitcoin.
Lemme ask you something. It is said Craig claimed him and 4 or more others created bitcoin, why are you calling HIM Satoshi? And do you believe Gavins bullshit lie that one can prove they are Satoshi by signing with Satoshi's private key? Josh Nash sounded like a mathematician rather than a creator of bitcoin. If compared to Craig Wright, wright is more reliable than John Nash and If i were to select between the two it would be Wright that I will vote. But as of now neither of the two is Satoshi Nakamoto since they fail to establish enough evidence and proof that they are really the creators of bitcoin.
did you listen or read the article, because I don't believe you did. listen. 
Josh Nash sounded like a mathematician rather than a creator of bitcoin. If compared to Craig Wright, wright is more reliable than John Nash and If i were to select between the two it would be Wright that I will vote. But as of now neither of the two is Satoshi Nakamoto since they fail to establish enough evidence and proof that they are really the creators of bitcoin.
I do not care so much, I just care who operates BTC
The article is fact after fact after fact.......
Everything is perfectly cited.
John Nash created bitcoin, anyone that sincerely looks at the facts will agree.
Everything is perfectly cited.
John Nash created bitcoin, anyone that sincerely looks at the facts will agree.
My theory is that traincarswreck caused the taxicab accident that took John and Alicia Nash's life.
Not quite sure how this relates to Bitcoin. I might be wrong but this fuzz about Satoshi is making people see things where they don't exist. I might be wrong though, would like to see proof relating someone to Satoshi if it exists.
You are perfectly admitting you didn't listen to the link or read the article aren't you? Like just for others can you clarify this is true or not? No one who has listened to the talk has said something so asinine, just so others are aware.Yes, I didn't listen to the talk. No, I read the article. If you could point me to where in the talk do we have proof that John Nash created Bitcoin, I'd be thankful.
Indeed the proof of facts are very vague to point John Nash as the creator of Bitcoin even the qouted proof that were posted as a reply to my post here tells nothing about John Nash creating Bitcoin, those were just some events that were taken as proof of John Nash planning on something and that programming mentioned were built to search next prime number that were well suited to the concept of Primecoin.
Not quite sure how this relates to Bitcoin. I might be wrong but this fuzz about Satoshi is making people see things where they don't exist. I might be wrong though, would like to see proof relating someone to Satoshi if it exists.
You are perfectly admitting you didn't listen to the link or read the article aren't you? Like just for others can you clarify this is true or not? No one who has listened to the talk has said something so asinine, just so others are aware.Yes, I didn't listen to the talk. No, I read the article. If you could point me to where in the talk do we have proof that John Nash created Bitcoin, I'd be thankful.
The article is fact after fact after fact.......
Everything is perfectly cited.
John Nash created bitcoin, anyone that sincerely looks at the facts will agree.
Everything is perfectly cited.
John Nash created bitcoin, anyone that sincerely looks at the facts will agree.
So wheres the evidence? Its funny coz he is not a code expert. But he is a math genius. How can he create such technology?
Keep trying. I think we are very close to Satoshi Nakamoto. Lol
Oh! theres another one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/as-it-turns-out-craig-wright-actually-is-satoshi-1765953
Did you also just comment on something you haven't read or listened to? Keep trying. I think we are very close to Satoshi Nakamoto. Lol
Oh! theres another one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/as-it-turns-out-craig-wright-actually-is-satoshi-1765953
So wheres the evidence? Its funny coz he is not a code expert. But he is a math genius. How can he create such technology?
Keep trying. I think we are very close to Satoshi Nakamoto. Lol
Oh! theres another one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/as-it-turns-out-craig-wright-actually-is-satoshi-1765953
Keep trying. I think we are very close to Satoshi Nakamoto. Lol
Oh! theres another one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/as-it-turns-out-craig-wright-actually-is-satoshi-1765953
Not quite sure how this relates to Bitcoin. I might be wrong but this fuzz about Satoshi is making people see things where they don't exist. I might be wrong though, would like to see proof relating someone to Satoshi if it exists.
You are perfectly admitting you didn't listen to the link or read the article aren't you? Like just for others can you clarify this is true or not? No one who has listened to the talk has said something so asinine, just so others are aware.
Not quite sure how this relates to Bitcoin. I might be wrong but this fuzz about Satoshi is making people see things where they don't exist. I might be wrong though, would like to see proof relating someone to Satoshi if it exists.
Jump to: