Topic: John Nash created bitcoin - page 20. (Read 22259 times)

as it just seems like there is an ulterior motive for this trainwreck to be so desperate to get people to follow and applaud him. it just seems too desperate to just be about medium.com clickbait

You better have at least read the article before you put your nose in my shit.

This person is an ignorant piece of shit commenting on things they know absolutely nothing about and have absolutely no capacity to understand. Get the fuck out of this thread you fucking troll piece of shit of a person.

Quite frankly there is no way to prove who is satoshi, if he lost the private keys.

Even if satoshi would come out now, and say that he is satoshi, if there is no proof, then his whole "satoshi" identity is impossible to prove.

So I think this is one of the reasons why he doesnt want to come out ,because he cant prove himself anyway.

I have seen over 5 threads recently with people claiming different names as being "the Bitcoin creators". No matter if that person is a math genius, a genius coder or anything else, unless he shows evidence there is no way you can find out who that person really was. Maybe he is someone VERY smart, a genius that nobody knows about.. And I personally think he will never reveal himself (unless after death he's found to be the one) for security reasons.

He no doubt "created" Bitcoin in the sense, that he formulated the theory that inspired satoshi.

Satoshi was definitely not Nash, no way. Nash wasnt really into practical things and also not a coder.

However Satoshi probably read Nash's work, and got inspired by it.

john nash although a maths genius, had other mental issues. which got worse.
he suffered medical problems too.
although he done the occassional 1 hour talks.. he lacked the attention span and abilities to have created bitcoin

i do laugh at how trainwreck is now backtracking to say he "influenced" satoshi, and was not actually satoshi..

anyway trainwreck. have a good night. you cannot provide any proof and you are just repeating yourself now about how we cannot be clicking your clickbait if we are not agreeing with your failed attempts of showing proof he created bitcoin.

your clickbait contains nothing of substance.

trainwrecks mindset
there was a caveman who was smartr then his peers. he mad fire.. every other living thing bowed down to him in shock of his brilliance and power.

later
someone produced a combustion engine car.
common sense if it involves combustion then it must have some underlying understanding of fire..
a few people years ago harp on about was the combustion engine enspired by the caveman inventing fire..

later

trainwreck makes a statement
"cave men created the car"
followed by
"i am the first person to blah blah blah, click my link give me fame click my link.. i need fame, i need glory, click my link"

"if you dont bow down and give me glory you didnt click my link, so click my link, click my link give me fame click my link"

Did you read the article, or listen to my annotations, or just ignored them and came to spew ignorance.?

You are still quoting me dumbass. plus the last links is irrelevant. I told you.  I am the ONE.

I am not denying nor supporting this thesis. But I find it is very convenient to call Nash creator of BTC, since he is unfortunately dead.
So there is no way for him to deny or confirm this revelation defectively making him a great candidate to force Satoshi title on him.
Until real Satoshi will reveal himself one day, Nash may be "Tier 1" candidate along with: Adam Back ,Charles Bry, David Chaum
Michael Clear, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Neal J. King, Martti Malmi, Shinichi Mochizuki, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman and Nick Szabo.
 

lol RESEARCH HARDER

2015 - http://www.indiabitcoin.com/can-bitcoin-be-john-nashs-ideal-money-newsbtc/
2015 - http://www.coindesk.com/did-john-nash-help-invent-bitcoin/
2014 - http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/30/business-finance-investing/john-nash-created-bitcoin-1432655/
2013 - https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2013/11/11/game-theory-and-bitcoin/

trainwreck.. your not original. you also have not even shown any proof. just opinions. and as i said a few times your not the first to try saying it.

research harder,

thats ALL from ME dumbass.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2gzoxa/john_nash_is_satoshi_nakamoto/

http://www.coindesk.com/did-john-nash-help-invent-bitcoin/

https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-nashs-death-prompts-renewed-speculation-over-bitcoin-creation

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/called-the-inventor-of-bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto/

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@jokerpravis/why-there-is-so-much-talk-about-john-nash-s-possible-relationship-to-bitcoin

http://bitcoinpricelive.com/john-nash-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin/

https://thewealthofchips.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/why-bitcoin-is-and-isnt-ideal-money/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUyCO3FXHS4

http://themonetaryfuture.blogspot.com/2011/07/bitcoin-decentralization-and-nash.html

....ad infinitum

John Nash got the idea for ideal money when we went crazy and was forcibly confined in psychiatric care. 50 years later he started to tour the world talking about how an international e-currency would take power from central banks to print money. He also explained in great detail, how this will all unfold, and what will be the result-and exactly how we should move forward with bitcoin.

It's weird how you have an opinion but haven't traversed the material you have an opinion about.

You are referring to ALL me. No one else has read the material, numb nuts.

You are not the only one.  That idea has been suggested countless times.  You may be onto a trail that many others have been on but that trail may lead you closer to the truth.  I agree with Franky1, keep digging; the more you dig the more interesting things become.  Interesting find though, thanks!  Nash is one of my all time favorites.

I did not read it nor heard the provided materials. Anyone care to give a tl;dr? Besides that i do not care if he invented it or not. Since he is dead i would be even kind of glad, because he can not be used to manipulate the minds of people.

While I don't really believe that Nash was instrumental in the coding of bitcoin, I do believe his thinking influenced those who were involved, in some way.  And, coding was part of the curriculum in many higher math and science degrees then, but more so now (Nash, no doubt, was at least fluent in Fortran).  Now days, a simple B.S.E.E requires c++, assembly, and Matlab.  So, we could assume that Nash was at least exposed to coding. Mathematica is, after all, a staple in most courses in higher mathematics.  It's hard to separate the coding from the math now days.  I don't think (very seriously doubt) Nash is the coding guy but his thoughts may have influenced the thinking somewhere along the line.  Right?  Maybe?

I am the only person that has done research and provided it to the community on the subject of Nash Ideal Money and its relation to bitcoin, dumbass.  Everyone.  Look at this idiot, talking about someone they know nothing about.