Pages:
Author

Topic: Just 8 men own same wealth as half the world - page 2. (Read 5121 times)

legendary
Activity: 1066
Merit: 1050
Khazad ai-menu!
Exactly, i don't know if what type of user he is but usually a normal person is satisfied with the microsoft OS and aside from that they are widely known as well for their ms office it is i guess the most widely used editing type. They have actually a good products and that is why they are still on the market right now as well as the founder.

I have used various operating systems including Windows, IOS, Fedora, and Ubuntu. I found Windows the most user friendly. For tech savvy people, Ubuntu may be better, but the vast majority of the remainder is going to chose Windows.

This is quite an outlier case.  I've never seen a client wish to return to a windows environment after having a non-backdoored system, mostly just because it winds up being faster and easier to use.  This is for folks of little to no technical ability. 

People "choose" windows because it comes preinstalled and nobody has told them a much easier and more functional option exists.  Who would tell them?  There's no advertising or company to say anything.  You have to be lucky enough to have somebody in your life who knows something about computers. 
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Exactly, i don't know if what type of user he is but usually a normal person is satisfied with the microsoft OS and aside from that they are widely known as well for their ms office it is i guess the most widely used editing type. They have actually a good products and that is why they are still on the market right now as well as the founder.

I have used various operating systems including Windows, IOS, Fedora, and Ubuntu. I found Windows the most user friendly. For tech savvy people, Ubuntu may be better, but the vast majority of the remainder is going to chose Windows.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
I haven't researched about this case but if this is true then I can say that if the money would be spread to all people in the world then there would not be poor or rich people and all would be considered equal. World populations is estimated to 7 billion so those 8 men are as rich as 3.5 billion people in the world.

We all citizens must know about this research, but we must know if it is only a research or it is not a fact. We cannot claim that there are only 8 men own same wealth, because some other people, or others save money in bank, we cannot see their true money. But it is true to spread money for poor people, to have a fair living.

It doesn't have to be all money on the bank because they charge fees (or these people get interest leaving their money there) and there is a high risk that if these people do something that government don't like then the government can close or freeze their bank accounts and their money could not me spend. Tech companies are rich too, check microsoft apple or facebook, they are damn too rich.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 588
What good is produced by Microsoft? Windows really is not the best operating system. Just due to the fact that bill gates had the advantage due to the fact that he was now cornered the market and will not allow to competitors.

Windows may not be the best operating system, but their support service is the best. Also, the other operating systems (especially Linux) is not compatible with most of the software and PC games. What is the use in having a computer, if you are unable to use any software? Also, I can't blame Windows for this. There are thousands of Linux versions, and software which is compatible in one version may not be compatible in another.

Exactly, i don't know if what type of user he is but usually a normal person is satisfied with the microsoft OS and aside from that they are widely known as well for their ms office it is i guess the most widely used editing type. They have actually a good products and that is why they are still on the market right now as well as the founder.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
What good is produced by Microsoft? Windows really is not the best operating system. Just due to the fact that bill gates had the advantage due to the fact that he was now cornered the market and will not allow to competitors.

Windows may not be the best operating system, but their support service is the best. Also, the other operating systems (especially Linux) is not compatible with most of the software and PC games. What is the use in having a computer, if you are unable to use any software? Also, I can't blame Windows for this. There are thousands of Linux versions, and software which is compatible in one version may not be compatible in another.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 588

What does silicon valley? View the full list of the richest people. Most of these people have no relation to new technologies. It's the financiers. They simply speculate on the financial market. They are parasites.

That is the place where most of the biggest tech companies are operating. Lol seriously?  Of course do you know bill gates? the founder of microsoft?(which is an obvious tech? do you know marK? the founder of fb? and larry the founder of google?) both of those are probably part of the 8 men and they are all a founder of a tech company so obviously Tech are taking a huge part of becoming rich
What good is produced by Microsoft? Windows really is not the best operating system. Just due to the fact that bill gates had the advantage due to the fact that he was now cornered the market and will not allow to competitors.

Lol, If microsoft isn't good they are not operating in the market right now. Other thing is that if you are from the It industry you would really know why bill gates was the richest person in the world right now. Well, you maybe are right but still microsoft was one of the leading brand right in the industry
full member
Activity: 127
Merit: 100

What does silicon valley? View the full list of the richest people. Most of these people have no relation to new technologies. It's the financiers. They simply speculate on the financial market. They are parasites.

That is the place where most of the biggest tech companies are operating. Lol seriously?  Of course do you know bill gates? the founder of microsoft?(which is an obvious tech? do you know marK? the founder of fb? and larry the founder of google?) both of those are probably part of the 8 men and they are all a founder of a tech company so obviously Tech are taking a huge part of becoming rich
What good is produced by Microsoft? Windows really is not the best operating system. Just due to the fact that bill gates had the advantage due to the fact that he was now cornered the market and will not allow to competitors.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 588

What does silicon valley? View the full list of the richest people. Most of these people have no relation to new technologies. It's the financiers. They simply speculate on the financial market. They are parasites.

That is the place where most of the biggest tech companies are operating. Lol seriously?  Of course do you know bill gates? the founder of microsoft?(which is an obvious tech? do you know marK? the founder of fb? and larry the founder of google?) both of those are probably part of the 8 men and they are all a founder of a tech company so obviously Tech are taking a huge part of becoming rich
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.

IMO, the education must be 100% free, up to the University level. In addition to that, the students must get reimbursement for their conveyance and food/stationary expenses. This will help the poor people to grab more opportunities.
It seems to me that education and not only it may not be free. I do believe that everything that comes for free it is not valued. Another thing is that it should be paid from different sources, and perhaps a loan.

You are going too far from the subject lol. They are the richest because they have the capabilities to become and they do it with harwork. Being poor or rich doesn't matter however they are i guess all from a first world country which means the probability of becoming this rich is also higher than other countries because they have the technologies and better system as well.

 I also assumed that most of the top 8 was living on the silicon valley right now where tech companies(largest) were at.
What does silicon valley? View the full list of the richest people. Most of these people have no relation to new technologies. It's the financiers. They simply speculate on the financial market. They are parasites.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 588
No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.

IMO, the education must be 100% free, up to the University level. In addition to that, the students must get reimbursement for their conveyance and food/stationary expenses. This will help the poor people to grab more opportunities.
It seems to me that education and not only it may not be free. I do believe that everything that comes for free it is not valued. Another thing is that it should be paid from different sources, and perhaps a loan.

You are going too far from the subject lol. They are the richest because they have the capabilities to become and they do it with harwork. Being poor or rich doesn't matter however they are i guess all from a first world country which means the probability of becoming this rich is also higher than other countries because they have the technologies and better system as well.

 I also assumed that most of the top 8 was living on the silicon valley right now where tech companies(largest) were at.
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.

IMO, the education must be 100% free, up to the University level. In addition to that, the students must get reimbursement for their conveyance and food/stationary expenses. This will help the poor people to grab more opportunities.
It seems to me that education and not only it may not be free. I do believe that everything that comes for free it is not valued. Another thing is that it should be paid from different sources, and perhaps a loan.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.

IMO, the education must be 100% free, up to the University level. In addition to that, the students must get reimbursement for their conveyance and food/stationary expenses. This will help the poor people to grab more opportunities.

WHAT? But...
But...

Weren't you one of those idiot conservatives who think we should all pay everything for ourselves and there should be no taxes and all?
Well I might have confused you with another member but I was pretty sure you were one of those idiots...
My bad though.

Indeed free education is a mandatory step to a developed and rather equal society.
I don't know what I would have become in a USA-kind of country when only the rich can go to university :/
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.

IMO, the education must be 100% free, up to the University level. In addition to that, the students must get reimbursement for their conveyance and food/stationary expenses. This will help the poor people to grab more opportunities.
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
I agree with you. But not only money makes born in rich families to earn more income. There is still a connection. They agree among themselves and where the ordinary person does not earn the money they earn millions.

Yeah even without taking into account the social aspect with education or things like that, the social groups are important!

It's so much easier to earn money when your dad is the boss of a big company...
You get everything you need. Internships, jobs, studies, formations...

It doesn't mean you didn't earn the money, it's just SO MUCH EASIER for you...
Even if your ideas are no investors then your relative who owns a big company will provide you the investor and assistance in the implementation of the project. Therefore, people are not equal initially.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 529
I agree with you. But not only money makes born in rich families to earn more income. There is still a connection. They agree among themselves and where the ordinary person does not earn the money they earn millions.

Yeah even without taking into account the social aspect with education or things like that, the social groups are important!

It's so much easier to earn money when your dad is the boss of a big company...
You get everything you need. Internships, jobs, studies, formations...

It doesn't mean you didn't earn the money, it's just SO MUCH EASIER for you...
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 100
Statistically it's not being lazy that makes you poor, it's coming from a poor family.

It is the combination of laziness and religious indoctrination, which creates poverty. There are a lot of people around us, who became super-rich as a result of their hard work. Many of them were born in poor families. For example, Howard Schultz grew up in a government subsidized apartment complex for the poor.

No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.
I agree with you. But not only money makes born in rich families to earn more income. There is still a connection. They agree among themselves and where the ordinary person does not earn the money they earn millions.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Statistically it's not being lazy that makes you poor, it's coming from a poor family.

It is the combination of laziness and religious indoctrination, which creates poverty. There are a lot of people around us, who became super-rich as a result of their hard work. Many of them were born in poor families. For example, Howard Schultz grew up in a government subsidized apartment complex for the poor.

No.
Most of them come from very wealthy families, at least rich enough to pay them the best education.
You don't become poor because you're lazy. You become poor because you were born poor AND you don't have enough will, work, education and luck to become rich.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 529
Statistically it's not being lazy that makes you poor, it's coming from a poor family.

It is the combination of laziness and religious indoctrination, which creates poverty. There are a lot of people around us, who became super-rich as a result of their hard work. Many of them were born in poor families. For example, Howard Schultz grew up in a government subsidized apartment complex for the poor.
So it would mean that welfare actually helps people accomplishing themselves? Grin
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
this situation is gonna change soon by virtue of Bitcoin expansion
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 588
I havent read the article yet but i have probably predicted that bill gates was on the top and then the founder of google larry and facebook i supposed to be part of it as well. More than that i see nothing wrong about it they earned it in the first place anyways
Pages:
Jump to: