Well i think bounty manager already make a deal with the team. Bounty manager only manage campaign but the rules will create by the team. Usually the rules can be change by team and thats the sad part. Bounty manager doing his job for the best
Only few developers approves to escrow bounty funds since some funds were only available after the ICO succeed. All we can do is assess whether the project have what it takes to b succeed and get investors to assure the payment but if not then probably we're wasting our time even the bounty manager is good but the project itself is not.
Topic: Just a thought about bounties and bounty managers - page 5. (Read 702 times)
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
The managers could also have the same thing of holding or take the token for himself instead of distributing it to the hunters as it is his job. We couldn't judge them of course, especially if they are in this industry longer than anyone else. I guess, it will all depends on the setup of the manager and the team of devs and they must agree with the terms and trust that both will keep their end of the bargain.
The crypto market is hard to believe at this time, both the bounty manager and the project team can deceive bounty participants, so it's good to follow the bounty, choose a popular manager who has a good trust account has more value in this forum.
We have nothing to do by that because there are also some projects that being escrowed already the fancy token but it also ends up nothing when it is not listing to exchange. The distributions were there but dont have value in the market. It seems useless if they are all like this. The only solution is they will pay through dollars not just by their fancy tokens. Or they will pay Ethereum as their fund collected. All projects that I joined last year, they are nonsense and no value.
Well i think bounty manager already make a deal with the team. Bounty manager only manage campaign but the rules will create by the team. Usually the rules can be change by team and thats the sad part. Bounty manager doing his job for the best
Only few developers approves to escrow bounty funds since some funds were only available after the ICO succeed. All we can do is assess whether the project have what it takes to b succeed and get investors to assure the payment but if not then probably we're wasting our time even the bounty manager is good but the project itself is not. 
Well i think bounty manager already make a deal with the team. Bounty manager only manage campaign but the rules will create by the team. Usually the rules can be change by team and thats the sad part. Bounty manager doing his job for the best
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
Managers must have an important role and carry out all the tasks associated with campaign forums, and also distribution.+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
if the developer doesn't believe there is still an escrow from DT. there must be some kind of initial insurance of a few percent in the form of btc or usd to guarantee the project is not negative or let the project fail only on circumstances and make participants disappointed. If it's not like this, many projects with poor quality will always move.
in my opinion between the bounty hunters and gift managers are almost the same, they are just workers. and who has full control over the bounty and the token remains the team. tokens will be distributed or not, will be valuable or not, it depends on the team not the manager. so when there is a scam or a very low price, it's not the manager's fault but his team.
If projects team are thinking that the bounty manager might run off with the bounty tokens then they should start using well known professional bounty managers
A good project will definitely choose a bounty manager who already has a good reputation in this forum and is well known in the cryptocurrency community. From what I understand, the bounty manager has the authority to manage the campaign, but for payment matters, it still depends on the developer team
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
not really, indeed the work of the bounty manager is the selection of bounty participants and after that is paid if they submit their work, then the project team processes payments, if the project team does not pay means they are scam +The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
if your idea is like that maybe many project teams feel disadvantaged, because the bounty manager might be able to run off their money, so the project team and bounty manager invite trusted people in the forum to become third-party escrow who hold project funds for bounty hunters+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
A good project will definitely choose a bounty manager who already has a good reputation in this forum and is well known in the cryptocurrency community. From what I understand, the bounty manager has the authority to manage the campaign, but for payment matters, it still depends on the developer team
There are bounty managers that are ensuring the payment for their participants because it's part of their responsibility to choose the legit and reliable bounty that they will manage. If the management of that project doesn't agree with his given term, it's up on him on how he will handle the rule.
They can follow up the distribution until it's all solved to give assurance for their participants which is part of their job. But if not, their part is limited and that's why you have to be picky in choosing although many of the bounties are not that good anymore.
They can follow up the distribution until it's all solved to give assurance for their participants which is part of their job. But if not, their part is limited and that's why you have to be picky in choosing although many of the bounties are not that good anymore.
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
not really, indeed the work of the bounty manager is the selection of bounty participants and after that is paid if they submit their work, then the project team processes payments, if the project team does not pay means they are scam +The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
if your idea is like that maybe many project teams feel disadvantaged, because the bounty manager might be able to run off their money, so the project team and bounty manager invite trusted people in the forum to become third-party escrow who hold project funds for bounty hunters+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
In the past, the bounty managers themselves were personally involved in the distribution, and there were even projects that saw them as a member of the team. But now it is almost impossible to face such situations. Managers' work is limited to hunters' compliance with rules and the correct division of weekly stakes. Like us, they also expect when the reward will be given. Therefore, managers are not always guilty if the reward is not given on time or not at all.
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
These are the disadvantages when the bounty rewards are not esrowed. Bounty hunters should know the terms of the campaign eg duration, allocation and the time distribution, however some campaigns don’t keep their promises due to unexpected events. +The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
I used to participate in many different bounty campaigns a few years ago with a few decent payouts. Nevertheless, only one in 20 was a good payout while the others revealed unsatisfactory (too much time - little reward).
These days, it seems that the rate has further declined and I am not sure bounty hunters are still able to make a decent profit / hour.
Managers just do their job.
These days, it seems that the rate has further declined and I am not sure bounty hunters are still able to make a decent profit / hour.
Managers just do their job.
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
No, they won't let this happen.
Managers will just manage. They will submit the spreadsheet of how much every participant will be paid accordingly.
They wont give that tokens to the manager for security. They could just run with it and tell that it had all been submitted to each participant.
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
not really, indeed the work of the bounty manager is the selection of bounty participants and after that is paid if they submit their work, then the project team processes payments, if the project team does not pay means they are scamIt is correct that if the project do not pay it is already a scam, but I also think that if the bounty manager will hold the fund then chances for bounty hunters to get paid is high.
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
if your idea is like that maybe many project teams feel disadvantaged, because the bounty manager might be able to run off their money, so the project team and bounty manager invite trusted people in the forum to become third-party escrow who hold project funds for bounty hunters+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Escrow really take a big part in here, it is to avoid scam users to run the monry for their own.
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
No, they won't let this happen.
Managers will just manage. They will submit the spreadsheet of how much every participant will be paid accordingly.
They wont give that tokens to the manager for security. They could just run with it and tell that it had all been submitted to each participant.
If you are the owner of the ICO or IEO, will you trust the manager to keep his word?
I heard that what most bounty managers do is to conduct the bounty project and later submit to projects teams for distribution, is this not why some projects never paid bounty hunters?
+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
Even bounty manager have the allocated tokens there is no security that you will get paid.+The job of a bounty manager should be the guide standing between bounty hunters and project teams
+ Bounty managers should be the ones to hold on to the project tokens and distribute after bounty ends
Avoid these and teams might decide not to pay or send out half payments to half of the hunters, it should be more like how IEO is where exchange stands between investors and team
Since more of the ICO project use token and many project also making a new token contract if they see that there are something wrong with the old contract then your payment will be worthless.
Even you have the tokens for your payment if there are no exchange tradeable that token then this also a worthless tokens until its listed.
Jump to: