Topic: JuSt a wish - page 5. (Read 943 times)
Although it seems as a valid argument, it doesn't work that way. You're basically asking institutions to lower their standards so as to accommodate projects that can't level up. I believe as an exchange, having a standard is very important, regardless of market conditions. Yet again, we're dealing with 'if'.
I also hope that there are so many projects that do sales in popular markets. Well, if not this year, I hope it will happen next year. but, as far as I know, to do a list or IEO on a popular market has several conditions, and these conditions are quite difficult to accept. like binance, it looks like binance only accepts projects that truly provide benefits, and also high potential. This is not just a matter of payment for the list, but also the quality of the project.
You may see it as being harsh or cruel on the part of the big exchanges to charge high fees for listing new projects especially those that conduct IEOs. It is important to understand that the exchanges also have their reputation to protect and not just quantity of coins to be listed. If things are made flexible on binance and co, some projects would just take advantage of the situation and create more mess.
Putting ridiculous listing fee doesn't necessarily increase reputation of exchanges, they can do thorough research as usual before agreeing to list even with fair listing fees. Decentralized exchanges like IDEX which claim to list for free usually do proper research and follow up on it, hence if there are deviations from listing terms, they immediately delist the token without prior notice. I think these big exchanges ain't helping matters when it comes to listing fees, I'm not saying it should be very low so that any "Tom or Jerry" can list, I'm just in the opinion that the fee should be avergage to help and encourage good startups. 
It is not just a matter of cost to enter a large exchange, a large exchange also has a project requirement that can enter a large exchange, because if a large exchange does not have a project requirement to enter a large exchange if there is a problem in the project, the large exchange will affected by this problematic project can make the reputation of a large exchange down
You may see it as being harsh or cruel on the part of the big exchanges to charge high fees for listing new projects especially those that conduct IEOs. It is important to understand that the exchanges also have their reputation to protect and not just quantity of coins to be listed. If things are made flexible on binance and co, some projects would just take advantage of the situation and create more mess.
for bination launchpad itself, I think it is easy, it's just that to register there requires a large amount of funds and I think all projects can actually go in there as long as they have funds, maybe an audit or something like that will be ignored if the funds they provide as fees for registering so much , btw this is just in my opinion maybe this could be wrong.
This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?
And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
As far as I know, the CEO of Binance only wants to collaborate with projects that according to themselves have a good reputation, not solely how much they have to pay for listing in the Binance market. And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
I think it's good to filter out any projects that might have a bad reputation.
The owners of these large exchanges do not want to help develop new projects, they want to make money. You must understand this. Unfortunately this is how it works.
If indeed the project deserves of course the market-class binance will consider it, just that we know 90% of the ICO/IEO now aims only to pump and dump most of them are garbage, so no wonder fee listings remain stable even though the market conditions are down, they try to keep their exchange good name.
but basically it is difficult to be registered in Binance, they do an internal selection. plus projects that are unable to pass the registration stage. but if a project is able to develop slowly they will surely grow and one day it can be registered.
A lot of paperwork and agreements are reached before most projects are allowed to host their token sales on exchanges like binance. Most of them are in non-disclosure agreements so not much is known to the public on how these dealings are conducted
Projects with low budget will definitely take into consideration many times if they are listing on Binance, or a global exchange of that class. With a good community, high trading volume, high web traffic, it will definitely easily attract the attention of investors, of course, it's equivalent to the fees charged.
Let's just say that they are selling their value to you. You know that your product is likely to meet the right audience on their platform and that's why you're looking for the opportunity to put it up there, and they too know that and that's why they are charging a high price for it. Building such a big platform and maintaining it is not easy, so they will always charge a lot of money for any organization that wants to place their product on their platform.
That's the reason why you should never rush into a project that you know you can't work to the end. You should always make sure that you have enough capital before diving into such a business. A major thing that kills most businesses is a lack of capital, so you should be sure you have enough and don't expect anyone to do it free of charge for you.
lack of money is not always the main problem. the problem is that th team doesn't know how to use this money correctly. I already participated in one project where the team raised about $ 5 million, but it simply did not fix the collected funds in a stable currency and then the project failed due to incorrect marketing. the most important thing is a smart team That's the reason why you should never rush into a project that you know you can't work to the end. You should always make sure that you have enough capital before diving into such a business. A major thing that kills most businesses is a lack of capital, so you should be sure you have enough and don't expect anyone to do it free of charge for you.
Let's just say that they are selling their value to you. You know that your product is likely to meet the right audience on their platform and that's why you're looking for the opportunity to put it up there, and they too know that and that's why they are charging a high price for it. Building such a big platform and maintaining it is not easy, so they will always charge a lot of money for any organization that wants to place their product on their platform.
That's the reason why you should never rush into a project that you know you can't work to the end. You should always make sure that you have enough capital before diving into such a business. A major thing that kills most businesses is a lack of capital, so you should be sure you have enough and don't expect anyone to do it free of charge for you.
That's the reason why you should never rush into a project that you know you can't work to the end. You should always make sure that you have enough capital before diving into such a business. A major thing that kills most businesses is a lack of capital, so you should be sure you have enough and don't expect anyone to do it free of charge for you.
I do not think that Binance has revealed how you can be a part of their IEO launchpad, but probably the answer is simple and it is money. The more you pay, the better is the chance of getting listed, because other IEO platforms are just garbage.
I agree with you when you say it involves money to be able to run an IEO on Binance since it's a big shot, however I don't agree with you when you term other IEO platforms garbage. My reason is because exchanges like OKEX, HUOBI, GATE.IO and KUCOIN still do well with IEO. In fact, I've made my highest IEO gains so far on Gate.io when I participated in SERO IEO and also made 3x on TOKO launched on KUCOIN even though I'm not holding any of those coins anymore. This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?
And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
Listing on big centralized exchanges has been a nightmare for new start-ups especially when they didn't raise sufficient funds during token sale. Assuming decentralized exchanges have required trading volume, popularity and good features suitable for traders at this point, the centralized exchanges posing very high fees before listing will adjust. Also, about a project agreeing to give a particular percentage to the exchange for IEO is tenable, notwithstanding they still need to pay part of the listing fee based on agreement. And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?
And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
This is the hard truth of what's happening and might keep happening for a long time. Most of these exchanges are only after their own pockets thus the reason for high listing fees. The funny thing is, most projects will start small and once the gain momentum will list in those top exchanges. Talking about IEOs, it's a different ball game altogether because the exchanges has turned it to a pump and dump stuff thus investors follows suit, everyone now cares about immediate profit and nothing more which these top exchanges offers though.
the problem of new project is they just can't stand out of each other, they are just look like the same from investors.
and at this time, listing on big exchanges is the money problem, even some shitty coin could make it if they have enough money to pay for exchange, I think.
you just need to do a quality project and then listings on large exchanges will not be a problem. large exchanges very often can add good projects for free. and at this time, listing on big exchanges is the money problem, even some shitty coin could make it if they have enough money to pay for exchange, I think.
You just stated facts and this have made many "potential" projects go backwards or struggle; we know good exchange contributes to the growth of any project. Now talking about IEO, I think there is more, maybe an agreement which will of course ensure the exchange receives a fat reward. On the case of listing, top exchanges doesn't care about your idea what they are after is their pay and if you can't afford check another exchange; this is actually why most projects gets started on smaller exchanges before moving up.
This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?
And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
Why have to choose an IEO listed with top exchange listed for investing because we know by invest on great exchange market can increase transaction volume above billion dollar, how come if listed with shit exchange market, who want to invest and buy back after coin listed and active for trading, I think although price down we can keep trust there are many sell and buy order if listed with big exchange market. And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects
This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?
The problem isnt always on exchange, but on the dev itself.the dev often doesnt wanna list the tokens/ coins to top exchange bcz of some reason (mostly fee).
Quote
And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?
ofc the exchange doesnt allow all tokens/ coins to get listed on the exchange, it is because of trust issueso exchange has its own agreement to get listed.
Quote
Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well.
all projects have chance, depends on how dev makes progress Jump to: