Author

Topic: Just-Dice.com : now with added CLAMs : Play or Invest - page 105. (Read 454769 times)

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
June 20th marks the 1st birthday for Just-Dice.

To celebrate we're having a 2 BTC poker freeroll at SealsWithClubs for Just-Dice regulars old and new.

Log in to your regular account, and type /poker in the chat box to see if you qualify for a free ticket.

There's also a 0.5 bounty on the head of both doog and Deb - knock either of them out to claim your 0.5 BTC prize.

6pm PST | 9pm EST | 2am GMT | 3am CET

For chat moderators of both DD and JD there's a 2nd freeroll an hour later, with another 2 BTC prize pool and two more 0.5 BTC bounties.

See you there!  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
The answer seems to be 284 million rolls.

The question isn't:

"how many rolls do we need so that I have a >50% chance of seeing a streak of length L or longer",

or

"how many rolls do we need so that the expected longest streak is of length L".

The question is:

"we have seen N rolls, what is my chance of seeing a streak of length L or longer?"

Which is kind of the same thing, but in the opposite direction, and apparently much harder to calculate.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1i545nMJFtALaiqaH8TTolcqBYj0DmnHr38Up0DElurM/edit#gid=1829191626

Solution for a streak of L = 28, for N rolls, in tab "L = 28". Add rows to increase N. Unfortunately sheets is limited to 400k rows. Perhaps another different program could use my formula to compute the answer for N = 357MM?
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?

Someone with an account name "theymos" lost hundreds of btc in JD yesterday. Smiley
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling

That would explain why I thought a whale died or something when the bankroll went up 2.1% over the last 4 days
Although if Theymos was actually gambling his donations that would be one way of giving back  Grin

It is obviously not the real Theymos Grin

If he was betting he would use a nickname Wink The bitcointalk cold wallet addresses can be checked for balance
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?

Someone with an account name "theymos" lost hundreds of btc in JD yesterday. Smiley
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling

That would explain why I thought a whale died or something when the bankroll went up 2.1% over the last 4 days
Although if Theymos was actually gambling his donations that would be one way of giving back  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

I don't think it's a good idea.

Why would you want a program to bet for you on a site where there's no winning strategy?

If you dislike playing enough that you do want to actually do it, perhaps you should stop playing.

You can just send your coins directly to my donation address in the FAQ if you want to get rid of them quickly.  Smiley

Some players love to autobet, it is actually fun and casinos are about giving fun to their clients

BTW I have been re-reading the first pages of this thread, it is fun, it brings us back
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 500
The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?

Someone with an account name "theymos" lost hundreds of btc in JD yesterday. Smiley
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

Dooglus will probably never implement his own, but there are a few 3rd party bots you can use. Here is one:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/seuntjies-dicebot-multi-site-multi-strategy-betting-bot-for-dice-with-charts-307425
But I don't think these bots are helpful for these games because these most of games depend on luck also

The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

Dooglus will probably never implement his own, but there are a few 3rd party bots you can use. Here is one:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/seuntjies-dicebot-multi-site-multi-strategy-betting-bot-for-dice-with-charts-307425
But I don't think these bots are helpful for these games because these most of games depend on luck also
legendary
Activity: 1717
Merit: 1125
Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

Dooglus will probably never implement his own, but there are a few 3rd party bots you can use. Here is one:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/seuntjies-dicebot-multi-site-multi-strategy-betting-bot-for-dice-with-charts-307425
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Hey dooglus,

Just wanted to compliment you on the site, awesome concept, I just invested nearly all my BTC.

According to http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling/ I should have done it earlier haha.

Keep up the good work!
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

I don't think it's a good idea.

Why would you want a program to bet for you on a site where there's no winning strategy?

If you dislike playing enough that you do want to actually do it, perhaps you should stop playing.

You can just send your coins directly to my donation address in the FAQ if you want to get rid of them quickly.  Smiley
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
ok.. tried to connect thru a VPS and it worked..
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
hi
https://just-dice.com/ seems to be down at the moment? or is it just me?


just you
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
hi
https://just-dice.com/ seems to be down at the moment? or is it just me?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0


The whole point I am making is that there is a difference between "the expected number of rolls to see a 6" and "the number of rolls you need to have a 50% chance of seeing a 6".



Agreed, and its a point worth making.

Read about what "expected value" means.

Just looked it up. Seems to mean the average. But expected value misses VERY important stuff. For example, the expected value of playing 6 rounds of russian roulette (1 bullet in 6 chambers and spinning the barrel EACH time...so its like the die) ...
... is that you are 1/6 dead. Not very useful info.

Im saying something similar to you - that its more interesting that with 6 plays (1 bullet) you will live 33% of the time.

You are asking about 50%.

with 5 plays, you live 5/6 ^ 5 =  40% of the time
and, as you pointed out, with 4 plays 5/6 ^ 4 = 48% of the time.

But that's not what expected value means.  Your expected value for each roll is +$999.001:
(1 * 1e6 - 999 * 1) / 1000 = 999.001

yes, but thats the average and assumes infinite rolls.
given finite rolls (like 1000 for example), the more interesting fact pertains to your question about 50% ..... and the answer is greater then 500 rolls (for 1/1000 event).

...its 692 rolls (.999 ^ 692)= 50% : the chance of seeing it one or more times



legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333

Consider rolling a 6 sided die until you roll a six.  The expected number of rolls to get a six is 6.


True, but incomplete

Only because you deleted the next line that I wrote:

But if you only roll 4 times, you have about a 51% of seeing a six, even though you've rolled less than the expected number.

The whole point I am making is that there is a difference between "the expected number of rolls to see a 6" and "the number of rolls you need to have a 50% chance of seeing a 6".

Take your die: You want to roll a six. You roll 6 times. Whats the probability of not seeing the six?
5/6 ^ 6 = 33.48% So a third of the time (with six observations) you will not see the 6 at all.

Read about what "expected value" means.

It sounds like you think it means "most likely value", but it doesn't.

Take your 1000 sided die.  Let's play a game.  If you roll a 6, you win a million dollars, but if you roll anything else, you lose a dollar.

What's the expected value of rolling the die?  Almost every time you roll (99.9% of the time), you lose a dollar.  So you 'expect' to lose almost every time.

But that's not what expected value means.  Your expected value for each roll is +$999.001:

(1 * 1e6 - 999 * 1) / 1000 = 999.001
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0

Consider rolling a 6 sided die until you roll a six.  The expected number of rolls to get a six is 6.


True, but incomplete - according to the small sample bias - rare events (<0.5) go 'unseen' more often then expected when the number of observations is small. Im sure the links offered by others goes into this.

Take your die: You want to roll a six. You roll 6 times. Whats the probability of not seeing the six?
5/6 ^ 6 = 33.48% So a third of the time (with six observations) you will not see the 6 at all.

It gets better. Imagine a 1000 sided die. You bet against the outcome "1000" and you roll exactly 1000 times.
The probability of getting away with it (not seeing the '1000' even once) is 0.999 ^ 999 = 36.8%

Many of your players are implementing this logic with bets with 98% chance of winning. The small sample bias predicts that, in 100 rolls, they will lose less then expected.

Since there is no free sandwich in life you can guess what happens the other 63.2% of the time you roll the 1000 sided die 1000 times..... You will see the rare outcome ('1000') one *or more* times.

Back to a streak of 28 reds (p=0.5). If you expect it to happen 1 in 236M rolls, the small sample bias (relative to the probability) predicts you will see such a steak once *or more* 63% of the time in 236M rolls but wont see it at all ~36% of the time.

M_acchi
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
The answer seems to be 284 million rolls.

The question isn't:

"how many rolls do we need so that I have a >50% chance of seeing a streak of length L or longer",

or

"how many rolls do we need so that the expected longest streak is of length L".

The question is:

"we have seen N rolls, what is my chance of seeing a streak of length L or longer?"

Which is kind of the same thing, but in the opposite direction, and apparently much harder to calculate.
Jump to: