Just-Dice.com : now with added CLAMs : Play or Invest - page 15.

BayAreaCoins

legendary

Activity: 4018

Merit: 1250

Owner at AltQuick.com

Just-dice related tweet for any users or people considering to use JD for free:

FreeBitcoins.com
‏@ClamcoinFaucet
Use our daily, hourly and minutely faucet once a day and roll once on http://Just-Dice.com You could win over $8,000 a day free. #Bitcoin

https://twitter.com/ClamcoinFaucet/status/811481127336742912

The math:

Daily= .01 CLAM
Hourly= .001 CLAM
Minutely= .0001 CLAM
Bet size = .0111 CLAM
Payout= 990000x
Profit = 10889.989 CLAMS
10889.989 CLAMS = $8130.58001522 USD at the time of this post.

02:11:57 (411) → (1485941) CLAM per USD : 1.33938649 ... 10889.989 CLAM = 8130.58001522 USD ... ::: NEXT AUTOMATED PRICE UPDATE IN ::: 22.39 Seconds !

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: jpcfan on December 16, 2016, 06:47:58 AM

bets are lagging big time. about 6-10 seconds inbetween bets

I know. Rather than having the site be down for a week while I migrated the database offline I figured I could do it while the site was up and running. But I was doing it too fast and it was interfering with the bet speed.

It should all be good now though.

jpcfan

hero member

Activity: 905

Merit: 502

I miss dooglus

Thanks doog for restarting betting

JD is great again!

p.s.

bets are lagging big time. about 6-10 seconds inbetween bets

seuntjie

legendary

Activity: 1717

Merit: 1125

I've been waiting for a site to hit an int overflow error, never thought it'd be JD, lol

Invulner

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Invulner

Quote from: dooglus on December 15, 2016, 11:52:38 PM

Quote from: dooglus on December 15, 2016, 10:32:09 PM

I've suspended betting and am modifying the database to remove the limitation.

I'll post again once it is done. I've no idea how long it will take, sorry.

It turned out it was going to take about 8 days to fix the database table that contains the old bet archive. So rather than waiting for that to happen I made a new empty bet archive table. Betting is active again now, but you won't be able to look up details of old bets until I migrate them into the new table.

That will happen gradually over the coming weeks (and hopefully not months, but we'll see...).

None of the data is lost, it just needs a little massaging.

Nice, good to see that the betting is back up again.

Will enjoy another degenerate session hopefully soon, haha. Always enjoyed gambling my funds away on JD Cheesy

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: dooglus on December 15, 2016, 10:32:09 PM

I've suspended betting and am modifying the database to remove the limitation.

I'll post again once it is done. I've no idea how long it will take, sorry.

It turned out it was going to take about 8 days to fix the database table that contains the old bet archive. So rather than waiting for that to happen I made a new empty bet archive table. Betting is active again now, but you won't be able to look up details of old bets until I migrate them into the new table.

That will happen gradually over the coming weeks (and hopefully not months, but we'll see...).

None of the data is lost, it just needs a little massaging.

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on December 15, 2016, 10:35:37 PM

Why would you put a limitation like that in the first place?

Seems like it would just be an extra line of code to go in.

Database rows are typically a fixed length. Why use 8 bytes per betid if you think they will always fit into 4 bytes. When you're storing 2 billion of them it makes a difference. Either way you need to decide what size each field in each database table needs to be.

tryphe

member

Activity: 116

Merit: 10

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on December 15, 2016, 10:35:37 PM

Quote from: dooglus on December 15, 2016, 10:32:09 PM

From the CLAM thread:

Quote from: jpcfan on December 15, 2016, 09:21:33 PM

Doog, JD has some bugs now

It turns out when I designed the JD database I thought 2.1 billion bets would be more than would ever happen. We just hit 2.1 billion bets (2^31) so things stopped working.

I've suspended betting and am modifying the database to remove the limitation.

I'll post again once it is done. I've no idea how long it will take, sorry.

Why would you put a limitation like that in the first place?

Seems like it would just be an extra line of code to go in.

Because

Code:

INT32_MAX = 2147483647

and people love using small default size variables. I actually joked that this would happen a few months back, however I thought I was wrong because you can enter any number in just-dice.com/roll/ etc. 1029381803572348957394875348975 and it doesn't complain. So I didn't say anything. *shrug* Wink

BayAreaCoins

legendary

Activity: 4018

Merit: 1250

Owner at AltQuick.com

Quote from: dooglus on December 15, 2016, 10:32:09 PM

From the CLAM thread:

Quote from: jpcfan on December 15, 2016, 09:21:33 PM

Doog, JD has some bugs now

It turns out when I designed the JD database I thought 2.1 billion bets would be more than would ever happen. We just hit 2.1 billion bets (2^31) so things stopped working.

I've suspended betting and am modifying the database to remove the limitation.

I'll post again once it is done. I've no idea how long it will take, sorry.

Why would you put a limitation like that in the first place?

Seems like it would just be an extra line of code to go in.

jpcfan

hero member

Activity: 905

Merit: 502

I miss dooglus

Thanks doog.

Make JD Great Again!

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

From the CLAM thread:

Quote from: jpcfan on December 15, 2016, 09:21:33 PM

Doog, JD has some bugs now

It turns out when I designed the JD database I thought 2.1 billion bets would be more than would ever happen. We just hit 2.1 billion bets (2^31) so things stopped working.

I've suspended betting and am modifying the database to remove the limitation.

I'll post again once it is done. I've no idea how long it will take, sorry.

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: dooglus on December 09, 2016, 01:03:58 AM

That was a happy coincidence. I almost surely wasn't thinking of that definition when I used the term.

Ha!

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: Dabs on December 08, 2016, 11:18:26 PM

(And, it was other people's money, ...

That always makes gambling more fun!

dooglus

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1333

Quote from: organofcorti on December 08, 2016, 04:49:39 PM

doog's use of "almost" is correct in this case.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_surely

"In probability theory, one says that an event happens almost surely (sometimes abbreviated as a.s.) if it happens with probability one."

That was a happy coincidence. I almost surely wasn't thinking of that definition when I used the term.

Dabs

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1912

The Concierge of Crypto

It doesn't have to be so large. I think I lost after 1.3 million bets. It was fun. (And, it was other people's money, who willingly gave it to me to do a million bets.)

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: tspacepilot on December 08, 2016, 04:21:12 PM

Quote from: dooglus on December 07, 2016, 03:13:01 AM

Quote from: emsjvh on December 07, 2016, 02:36:10 AM

Any plans of adding auto-rolling?

Not really. It seems like a silly idea to me.

There's a 1% house edge. There's no winning strategy. The attraction of the site is that it's fun to take a gamble, to see if you win or lose. Why would you want to have a bot play for you, when it's almost guaranteed to lose in the long run?

In fact, it *is* guaranteed to lose in the long run, as long as you choose a sufficiently large interpretation of 'long run', like, say, infinitely large. Wink

doog's use of "almost" is correct in this case.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_surely

"In probability theory, one says that an event happens almost surely (sometimes abbreviated as a.s.) if it happens with probability one."

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: dooglus on December 07, 2016, 03:13:01 AM

Quote from: emsjvh on December 07, 2016, 02:36:10 AM

Any plans of adding auto-rolling?

Not really. It seems like a silly idea to me.

There's a 1% house edge. There's no winning strategy. The attraction of the site is that it's fun to take a gamble, to see if you win or lose. Why would you want to have a bot play for you, when it's almost guaranteed to lose in the long run?

In fact, it *is* guaranteed to lose in the long run, as long as you choose a sufficiently large interpretation of 'long run', like, say, infinitely large. Wink

Invulner

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Invulner

Quote from: Dabs on December 07, 2016, 02:33:14 PM

Quote from: seuntjie on December 07, 2016, 01:41:12 PM

Quote from: dooglus on December 07, 2016, 03:13:01 AM

Quote from: emsjvh on December 07, 2016, 02:36:10 AM

Any plans of adding auto-rolling?

Not really. It seems like a silly idea to me.

There's a 1% house edge. There's no winning strategy. The attraction of the site is that it's fun to take a gamble, to see if you win or lose. Why would you want to have a bot play for you, when it's almost guaranteed to lose in the long run?

Some people seem to enjoy botting more than playing by hand

You can't roll a million bets in 5 days by hand.

But you're essentially making yourself lose more at a more guaranteed chance because the sample size is so large with bot betting. When you manual bet you can win in the short term but with botting you are almost guaranteed to lose.

However i guess the attraction for people is to program a "failsafe" algorithm that will beat the house - which is, i'm sorry to say, impossible for now unless you cheat the house.

Dabs

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1912

The Concierge of Crypto

Quote from: seuntjie on December 07, 2016, 01:41:12 PM

Quote from: dooglus on December 07, 2016, 03:13:01 AM

Quote from: emsjvh on December 07, 2016, 02:36:10 AM

Any plans of adding auto-rolling?

Not really. It seems like a silly idea to me.

There's a 1% house edge. There's no winning strategy. The attraction of the site is that it's fun to take a gamble, to see if you win or lose. Why would you want to have a bot play for you, when it's almost guaranteed to lose in the long run?

Some people seem to enjoy botting more than playing by hand

You can't roll a million bets in 5 days by hand.

seuntjie

legendary

Activity: 1717

Merit: 1125

Quote from: dooglus on December 07, 2016, 03:13:01 AM

Quote from: emsjvh on December 07, 2016, 02:36:10 AM

Any plans of adding auto-rolling?

Not really. It seems like a silly idea to me.

There's a 1% house edge. There's no winning strategy. The attraction of the site is that it's fun to take a gamble, to see if you win or lose. Why would you want to have a bot play for you, when it's almost guaranteed to lose in the long run?

Some people seem to enjoy botting more than playing by hand

Topic: Just-Dice.com : now with added CLAMs : Play or Invest - page 15. (Read 454814 times)