The true ethics surrounded gambling is that a winning strategy that may work today is said to be by luck that the bettor was lucky to bet on the streamline at that very moment.
That is apparently to say that... If the winning streamline gets on random then following the forebeing strategy would be invalid to give winning and not until the bettor is lucky enough to catch up with the new trends would he count to win again.
The reality is that... The casinos would never reveal moments of their Privacies as a course to reveal their weakness to bettors.
So ideally, streamers who claims perfection on betting are all formats of scamming.
So I hope everyone stays uncompromised not to be turned ON of winning strategies by the so gambling streamers otherwise "scammers".
Some interesting things can be derived from your questions about the morality of gambling and the nature of winning methods. Of course, a key point is that the strategy currently in use to win is a result of luck. Necessarily by definition, complacency has little effect. A short-term strategy can win for successful gamblers. However, if the playing style had changedThis might result from new factorsVariations in the game, or randomness, a single strategy was useful.
Your insight that casinos wouldn't allow outsiders to know what's going on behind the scenes is spot on the nose. They are essential in maintaining their mystique. And they quite often use a number of strategies to keep bettors guessing as to what is real and/or possible. The mystery creates an atmosphere wherein a bettor can easily be led to believe he might miss an opportunity. Especially as he watches someone else win.
That is where the systems of gambling come in. While some people share openly their respective experiences and opinions, others develop winning strategies that are not as foolproof as they claim them to be. They can thus easily build fascinating stories that make success appear replicable. They appeal to an audience hoping to share the same experience, but their success may simply be a product of luck or cherry-picked testing rather than a routine, repeatable strategy.
To gamblers This may be dangerous. It is very easy to get carried away by the heat of winning. Of course, with attractive characters as well. Moreover, one should be on guard not to fall prey to such frauds. As a rule, gambling should be taken more or less as a form of entertainment rather than as a means of steady income. Crisis awareness Discovery of causal role and awareness of possible loss
OP makes sense. But I am also curious about some gambling games, for example, Poker. Why there are some people being called "pro" or even in some tournaments where there are a lot of famous poker players that are very popular, so if means these people are always lucky before other people?
Or it will depends on the game your are playing?
I can say that poker plays an important role in the short term. This is especially true when the cards are dealt, but skill, strategy, and intuition are essential to long-term success. Professional players often spend years honing their skills. Analyze movement and learn how to read opponents.
This makes some players refer to themselves as "professionals" because they make the remaining ones play worse than them. Constantly It is not because they get lucky each time. They know how to play the game. Including how to bet, bluff, and strategy over time. Their capacity to handle risk and capitalize on the opposite player's mistake allows them to win more often.
Thus even though luck is a considerable portion of playing poker, But the line that separates good ones from the best is created by the combination of skill and experience. This is in contrast to how the rest of the games in casino differ from this. For fun is the key to those casino games.