Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1031. (Read 5352445 times)

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us! Cheesy

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time Grin

freaking catch-22...
we would have less lumpiness with more hashing power,
...every time we hit lower luck, newbs leave because they cannot handle it...and the cycle continues
...every time we hit high luck, newbs come like bees to honey, then leave as soon as we hit lower luck.

what kano needs is to get a serious farm committing and getting him over 50-75Ph.
we had above 40 at some point, but then hit a bump.
a non-mentioned pool, after getting over 40PH stably, accumulated more and more until 200PH
Well I did have someone looking at doing that, but I guess the ETF failure may have slowed that down, as it would appear has the supplier.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us! Cheesy

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time Grin

freaking catch-22...
we would have less lumpiness with more hashing power,
...every time we hit lower luck, newbs leave because they cannot handle it...and the cycle continues
...every time we hit high luck, newbs come like bees to honey, then leave as soon as we hit lower luck.

what kano needs is to get a serious farm committing and getting him over 50-75Ph.
we had above 40 at some point, but then hit a bump.
a non-mentioned pool, after getting over 40PH stably, accumulated more and more until 200PH
newbie
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
Another Block! Smiley
by 16hN...

Is that some kind of record for quickest back-to-back blocks?
[4 min 11 seconds] (at least for the last year or so of mining - certainly since the last halving)
Consecutive blocks in the global blockchain - 456826 then 456827. NICE!

#   Height   Who   Block Reward   When UTC   Status   Diff   Diff%   CDF   100 Luck%   B
1751   456827   16hNunxPKj42L1…   13.23997482   2017‑03‑12 01:35:25   +6 Confirms   1,429,409,606   0.310%   0.003   97.96%   1
1750   456826   dance191.S7120   13.75985443   2017‑03‑12 01:31:14   +7 Confirms   197,300,277,376   42.820%   0.348   97.13%   2

Keep 'em comin'!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us! Cheesy

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time Grin
full member
Activity: 341
Merit: 100
Quote
Immediately after any network block change, your first share/shares will usually be stale shares.
A pool block change also resets all the stats to zero - so it will actually start at 100% invalid for all your stale shares.
Patience padwan - check again and it will be dropping.

Thanks jedi master kano.

and yes I also see now that the one that had none caught up and has about the same now as the one that seemed to have a bunch while the other had none.


I was almost wondering is it was like Rejected shares that show in my miners browser.   I always noticed I tend to get a few rejects right at the start of a new block of if I reconnect the first few  shares sometimes have had as high as 10% rejects. But after enough time and a lot of shares its always down to about .1 or so % which from what I think I understand. is not bad.  TO just have one reject for about every 1000 shares.

Tho I did have to reboot one rig last week when it seemed to just be blasting out rejects at a very high rate. and like an idiot I was trying to trace down the prob as if i had a net work prob. esp even when reconnecting did fix the high reject rate then I noticed i had some x's in place of o's and thought oh great burn chips already but super glad to see it come back after a reboot and all was back to normal.


But glad to know there is not a problem with the stales esp being that its the same rig that was giveing me the high reject rate till a reboot.
























sr. member
Activity: 261
Merit: 250
Back to back blocks, very tasty!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Kano or any one else. im wondering I have a higher then should be number of invalids. ??

I was just looking at the workers info for my 2 S9s and its looking like one of them has a heck of a high amount of invalids for only being a few mins in this new block.     1.316% while my other is showing 0%

Workers (active during the last 7 days)
Show Details for Invalids:
Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
smutboy420.s92   10.300k   1s   186   1,915,800   15.21THs   9m 1s   0.535%   0.063%   13.68THs
smutboy420.s91   11.667k   1s   166   1,936,722   15.38THs   9m 1s   0.000%   0.063%   13.56THs
Total: 2 (2 miners)                    352    3,852,522   30.58THs       0.267%           0.126%   27.24THs


? is that a high amount of invalids and is there anything that could be causing one miner to have a high rate while the other has none so far??
Immediately after any network block change, your first share/shares will usually be stale shares.
A pool block change also resets all the stats to zero - so it will actually start at 100% invalid for all your stale shares.
Patience padwan - check again and it will be dropping.
full member
Activity: 341
Merit: 100
Kano or any one else. im wondering I have a higher then should be number of invalids. ??

I was just looking at the workers info for my 2 S9s and its looking like one of them has a heck of a high amount of invalids for only being a few mins in this new block.     1.316% while my other is showing 0%

Workers (active during the last 7 days)
Show Details for Invalids:
Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
smutboy420.s92   10.300k   1s   186   1,915,800   15.21THs   9m 1s   0.535%   0.063%   13.68THs
smutboy420.s91   11.667k   1s   166   1,936,722   15.38THs   9m 1s   0.000%   0.063%   13.56THs
Total: 2 (2 miners)                    352    3,852,522   30.58THs       0.267%           0.126%   27.24THs


? is that a high amount of invalids and is there anything that could be causing one miner to have a high rate while the other has none so far??





jr. member
Activity: 74
Merit: 1
I would like to make a complaint that we are getting blocks tooooo fast.  Please stop it.  he he I hope that satisfies that user that was wondering how come no one complains when we get blocks fast.
However, having said that, lets keep the TH under 25,000TH as you can see we are lucky when we have lower TH  Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
Another Block! Smiley
by 16hN...

Consecutive baby!
Crossing fingers for the, as yet, unseen triple!

Edit: Damn! Oh well....just have to keep wishing.
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
Another Block! Smiley
by 16hN...
Way to go 16hNunx! With decent fees too!
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 119
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Another Block! Smiley
by 16hN...
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Visualize whirledps
Let's BUST this MFing, GD, SOB, BLOCK NOW!!!! NO MORE RED!  Angry

Let's get back to regular GREEN BLOCKS!!!!!!! Cheesy

Can we say "Block Party Saturday"? If we all manifest it, it will come true - says a spacey girl I know.

COME ON BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
full member
Activity: 341
Merit: 100
LOL Kano I just realized that one fast block on top of the one before that which is waiting to be confirmed is going to lead to the Huh? of how come I dont see my payments  ?s comeing flooding in right after the last one matures and before the next block is found. 

I noticed more people tend to ask when they have a block that was the next block found before the lasts one were even matured..  More then when its just a block a day and usually just one block lag on payouts showing up in there wallets.

Just a small observation I seemed to notice about the frequency of when that ? comes up more often.   











 






 
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10


Probably not, but I am not sure what "exchange oversight" has to do with an ETF Huh
It means not relying solely on the folks running the exchange to be honest. Checks and balance's to give some assurance that it is not a scam and actually has all funds/reserves needed.

Of course that didn't stop Madoff from gaming the system with his Ponzi...

Right... Once could argue that if they cannot do it with bitcoin's public blockchain, then they cannot do it with any other asset. Sounds like a bit of a lame excuse to me, but then I have not done much digging into the issue. Anyway, BTC seems pretty much unaffected by the decision.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
BLOCK!

They seem to be like busses, nothing for ages and then two come along at once.
Only for 5 of the last 9 blocks.
We had bus loads of them before that Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2703
Evil beware: We have waffles!


Probably not, but I am not sure what "exchange oversight" has to do with an ETF Huh
It means not relying solely on the folks running the exchange to be honest. Checks and balance's to give some assurance that it is not a scam and actually has all funds/reserves needed.

Of course that didn't stop Madoff from gaming the system with his Ponzi...
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
Nice! Only 8+% diff with lots of fees!  Block party weekend starts!! Cool

St paddys day is coming up soon and hopefully we have a lot more green bars for March.

I got 2 pieces of corned beef on the stove top as I type.
Jump to: