KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1130.

n200UG

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 16, 2016, 12:12:55 AM

Quote from: n200UG on December 16, 2016, 12:00:33 AM

Quote from: sloopy on July 30, 2016, 09:59:26 PM

Mods: If this should be moved to the HW thread I apologize but I wanted to see responses from a small sample of my mining brothers and sisters here.

I do not normally recommend updating firmware and am not recommending anyone do so at this time. There could be all sorts of problems such as bricking the miner.

My experience with my recent avalon 6 update has been positive.

I took some screenshots of the miner GUI and poolside user shift performance for that miner. Not a great enough time has passed to say this is / was a good move.
Initially it appears I have made good gains in hashrate.
I only applied the MM update for troubleshooting.

My incoming voltage is over 12. Using the awesome adjustable 4k setup with the s9.
The hmi used to show 12, - 12.2 but that changed after an RPI update and I have not applied the most recent RPI update.
The hmi now shows between 11.8 and 12.1

I will post numbers when I confirm a consistent increase over additional time.

https://i.imgur.com/0bCGmqM.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/JZB0i3J.jpg

For all Avalon A6 owner's out there, I have updated my power supplies with this 2400watt Kits from Parallel, I've seen an hashing rate increase of 200mhs +- 30mhz per unit. The kit can power two A6 and two A7. http://www.parallelminer.com/product/delta-2400watt-platinum-94-efficiency-power-supply-208v240v/

12.5 volts is high volts it is over volts for the a6. I know I killed an Avalon 6 board with higher volts.

My Avalon are showing 12v solid in CGMINER GUI. Using a voltmeter the breakout board show 12.5v. However, once the Avalon are powered the voltage drop to 12.10 ~ 12.20 . Been running for 72hrs perfectly.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: n200UG on December 16, 2016, 12:00:33 AM

For all Avalon A6 owner's out there, I have updated my power supplies with this 2400watt Kits from Parallel, I've seen an hashing rate increase of 200mhs +- 30mhz per unit. The kit can power two A6 and two A7. http://www.parallelminer.com/product/delta-2400watt-platinum-94-efficiency-power-supply-208v240v/

200Mhs is nothing. Or do you mean Ghs or do you mean MHz. You mixed units there as well...

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: n200UG on December 16, 2016, 12:00:33 AM

Quote from: sloopy on July 30, 2016, 09:59:26 PM

Mods: If this should be moved to the HW thread I apologize but I wanted to see responses from a small sample of my mining brothers and sisters here.

I do not normally recommend updating firmware and am not recommending anyone do so at this time. There could be all sorts of problems such as bricking the miner.

My experience with my recent avalon 6 update has been positive.

I took some screenshots of the miner GUI and poolside user shift performance for that miner. Not a great enough time has passed to say this is / was a good move.
Initially it appears I have made good gains in hashrate.
I only applied the MM update for troubleshooting.

My incoming voltage is over 12. Using the awesome adjustable 4k setup with the s9.
The hmi used to show 12, - 12.2 but that changed after an RPI update and I have not applied the most recent RPI update.
The hmi now shows between 11.8 and 12.1

I will post numbers when I confirm a consistent increase over additional time.

For all Avalon A6 owner's out there, I have updated my power supplies with this 2400watt Kits from Parallel, I've seen an hashing rate increase of 200mhs +- 30mhz per unit. The kit can power two A6 and two A7. http://www.parallelminer.com/product/delta-2400watt-platinum-94-efficiency-power-supply-208v240v/

12.5 volts is high volts it is over volts for the a6. I know I killed an Avalon 6 board with higher volts.

n200UG

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

Quote from: sloopy on July 30, 2016, 09:59:26 PM

Mods: If this should be moved to the HW thread I apologize but I wanted to see responses from a small sample of my mining brothers and sisters here.

I do not normally recommend updating firmware and am not recommending anyone do so at this time. There could be all sorts of problems such as bricking the miner.

My experience with my recent avalon 6 update has been positive.

I took some screenshots of the miner GUI and poolside user shift performance for that miner. Not a great enough time has passed to say this is / was a good move.
Initially it appears I have made good gains in hashrate.
I only applied the MM update for troubleshooting.

My incoming voltage is over 12. Using the awesome adjustable 4k setup with the s9.
The hmi used to show 12, - 12.2 but that changed after an RPI update and I have not applied the most recent RPI update.
The hmi now shows between 11.8 and 12.1

I will post numbers when I confirm a consistent increase over additional time.

https://i.imgur.com/0bCGmqM.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/JZB0i3J.jpg

For all Avalon A6 owner's out there, I have updated my power supplies with this 2400watt Kits from Parallel, I've seen an hashing rate increase of 200mhs +- 30mhz per unit. The kit can power two A6 and two A7. http://www.parallelminer.com/product/delta-2400watt-platinum-94-efficiency-power-supply-208v240v/

n200UG

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

Quote from: PPOC on December 15, 2016, 08:35:11 PM

Quote from: pondule on December 15, 2016, 12:59:07 PM

Quote from: takagari on December 15, 2016, 11:52:53 AM

Quote from: firetreeactual on December 15, 2016, 11:39:44 AM

Interesting. I mine here because it's transparent, openly managed, and for all appearances over an extended period of time, honest. I don't give a rusty duck about a fancy GUI; I want to see hard numbers and open structure, and that's out front here and not buried. I'm reasonably confident that bad luck is simply that.

I've been doing this for several years. I came here last year. I'm not going anywhere.

Mine on.

I agree, a fancy GUI isn't important to me either, Although a bit more condensed homepage would be nice.
I'm just passing on what some of my friends have said, which means others feel it to.

Everyone who has done website design etc. Knows that info on a site isn't what pulls everyone in, look layout and feel are a big part, Even if it's irrelevant to the purpose.

Bitminter's got a good website layout and they've lost most of their hash power over the last 2 months.

Bitminer had a 49 day round, 2.061T, we are up to 2.092T and its only been a few days. I think this block on going to be a record and we should be due for a nice rebound.

I'm not going anywhere. I've seen this pool pull 10 block per day too often. Even with this difficulty. Does who leave will miss out

Newko

sr. member

Activity: 276

Merit: 250

I'm going to sleep now and I predict that when I wake up tomorrow morning this block will be cracked!
When the going gets tough, the tough (miners) stay right here!
Mine on!

NomadGroup

sr. member

Activity: 508

Merit: 250

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on December 15, 2016, 08:48:56 PM

I got my new 50 S9s with better power supplies
and will be hooking them up tomorrow
I can not currently deal with luck at all due to power bills and cost if investment.
I am also purchasing another 150 machines.
I wish this pool would be hashing at at least 5% of total power. This way luck becomes next to irrelevant.
But this pool is the best out of everything I tried so far.

I've just invested 10k my self and haven't even set up these s9'S! I was hoping for at least 50 blocks monthly but this doesn't look promising at all! What other pool would you consider if this one keeps at the same rate?

Biodom

legendary

Activity: 3892

Merit: 4331

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 15, 2016, 10:06:55 PM

years ago I stopped mining at bitminter as they did back to back 99 cdf's and 7 of 10 90% cdf's.

lucky for me my btc has dropped to about ½ my mining so I can still stay alive here with my zec earnings (i know do not mention alt coins)

I HAVE 40TH here doing meh , but I will stay longer then Jan 1... I will be 60 years old on Jan 27th so I am going to stay here until then.

funny, i joined around that time this year and also want to see 1 year stats, then possibly depart if this luck continues.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

years ago I stopped mining at bitminter as they did back to back 99 cdf's and 7 of 10 90% cdf's.

lucky for me my btc has dropped to about ½ my mining so I can still stay alive here with my zec earnings (i know do not mention alt coins)

I HAVE 40TH here doing meh , but I will stay longer then Jan 1... I will be 60 years old on Jan 27th so I am going to stay here until then.

torontobitcoinmanager

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 3

Quote from: firetreeactual on December 15, 2016, 09:13:36 PM

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on December 15, 2016, 08:48:56 PM

I got my new 50 S9s with better power supplies
and will be hooking them up tomorrow
I can not currently deal with luck at all due to power bills and cost if investment.
I am also purchasing another 150 machines.
I wish this pool would be hashing at at least 5% of total power. This way luck becomes next to irrelevant.
But this pool is the best out of everything I tried so far.

Hey...bring 'em on, bunkie! We can use it. You're entirely welcome. Cool

I will as soon as i see some stability

firetreeactual

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1003

Quote from: torontobitcoinmanager on December 15, 2016, 08:48:56 PM

I got my new 50 S9s with better power supplies
and will be hooking them up tomorrow
I can not currently deal with luck at all due to power bills and cost if investment.
I am also purchasing another 150 machines.
I wish this pool would be hashing at at least 5% of total power. This way luck becomes next to irrelevant.
But this pool is the best out of everything I tried so far.

Hey...bring 'em on, bunkie! We can use it. You're entirely welcome. Cool

Biodom

legendary

Activity: 3892

Merit: 4331

Quote from: PPOC on December 15, 2016, 08:40:46 PM

Quote from: ZACHM on December 15, 2016, 04:52:10 PM

Quote from: Biodom on December 15, 2016, 04:31:50 PM

of course it would have; not on luck itself, but stdev of blocks per day, almost certainly.
organofcorti should correct if i am wrong.

A smaller pool should typically have more variation in the number of blocks mined per day than a larger pool.

to me, this ^^ sounds right.

Yes, you will get more blocks per day, but you will still get 600%+ blocks.
Blocks per day is not the way to look at it, the way is average shares per block.

The only thing having more hashrate will do is make the bad blocks go by quicker, which makes it feel better, but the reality is that there is no difference. We would all be getting less per block also, so the amount of BTC per day would be lower, so the number of blocks per day is not relevant.

I remember seeing Antpoo going almost a full day with no blocks, I think it ended being a 1400% block

Oh, no....
If 1400% is possible, then what, a week without blocks is possible?
I hope we stop at about now or within 700%

torontobitcoinmanager

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 3

I got my new 50 S9s with better power supplies
and will be hooking them up tomorrow
I can not currently deal with luck at all due to power bills and cost if investment.
I am also purchasing another 150 machines.
I wish this pool would be hashing at at least 5% of total power. This way luck becomes next to irrelevant.
But this pool is the best out of everything I tried so far.

PPOC

hero member

Activity: 575

Merit: 500

Quote from: ZACHM on December 15, 2016, 04:52:10 PM

Quote from: Biodom on December 15, 2016, 04:31:50 PM

of course it would have; not on luck itself, but stdev of blocks per day, almost certainly.
organofcorti should correct if i am wrong.

A smaller pool should typically have more variation in the number of blocks mined per day than a larger pool.

to me, this ^^ sounds right.

Yes, you will get more blocks per day, but you will still get 600%+ blocks.
Blocks per day is not the way to look at it, the way is average shares per block.

The only thing having more hashrate will do is make the bad blocks go by quicker, which makes it feel better, but the reality is that there is no difference. We would all be getting less per block also, so the amount of BTC per day would be lower, so the number of blocks per day is not relevant.

I remember seeing Antpoo going almost a full day with no blocks, I think it ended being a 1400% block

PPOC

hero member

Activity: 575

Merit: 500

Quote from: pondule on December 15, 2016, 12:59:07 PM

Quote from: takagari on December 15, 2016, 11:52:53 AM

Quote from: firetreeactual on December 15, 2016, 11:39:44 AM

Interesting. I mine here because it's transparent, openly managed, and for all appearances over an extended period of time, honest. I don't give a rusty duck about a fancy GUI; I want to see hard numbers and open structure, and that's out front here and not buried. I'm reasonably confident that bad luck is simply that.

I've been doing this for several years. I came here last year. I'm not going anywhere.

Mine on.

I agree, a fancy GUI isn't important to me either, Although a bit more condensed homepage would be nice.
I'm just passing on what some of my friends have said, which means others feel it to.

Everyone who has done website design etc. Knows that info on a site isn't what pulls everyone in, look layout and feel are a big part, Even if it's irrelevant to the purpose.

Bitminter's got a good website layout and they've lost most of their hash power over the last 2 months.

Bitminer had a 49 day round, 2.061T, we are up to 2.092T and its only been a few days. I think this block on going to be a record and we should be due for a nice rebound.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Since it can cause no expected effect, but the block hash calculation is indeed a non-random calculation ...

I'm changing the payout address with a ckpool restart in 5 minutes.
All miners should just see a reconnect.
If your miner can't handle a reconnect it should just failover and then back about 5 minutes later.
(Yeah this bad luck is REALLY getting at me also)

tbonetony

sr. member

Activity: 441

Merit: 250

No zuo no die why you try, u zuo u die dont be shy

Quote from: Dak1 on December 15, 2016, 07:47:36 PM

New miner here and my first post. I added my first 13THs into the mix!

My friends tell me I am a lucky man, so I am hoping to bring a whole lot of it to the pool.

No doubt. More true if the tide turns around then you just dodged the last a few painful days Cheesy

Dak1

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

New miner here and my first post. I added my first 13THs into the mix!

My friends tell me I am a lucky man, so I am hoping to bring a whole lot of it to the pool.

IntroVert

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 119

Quote from: tbonetony on December 15, 2016, 06:39:12 PM

As of writing this, we are at 660%.

If you feel burnt more with every 1% plus, here's a better way to cool yourself down a bit, psychologically, and also, mathematically, true:

The worse the current, the more probable the end.

In the past we've had two or three 700%+ blocks but there was pretty much the top of it. Could we break it again this time, probably. But what's more likely to happen next is a block would arrive before that.

Assuming this is true, we are only or even less than another 50%'ish away Tongue

Timewise, this is likely the longest block in the pool history given the difficulty. The ones that were 700%+ took less time due to lower difficulty. I am pretty sure the suffering will end soon, we are approaching (or are already at) legendary bad luck share numbers, the most ever.

tbonetony

sr. member

Activity: 441

Merit: 250

No zuo no die why you try, u zuo u die dont be shy

As of writing this, we are at 660%.

If you feel burnt more with every 1% plus, here's a better way to cool yourself down a bit, psychologically, and also, mathematically, true:

The worse the current, the more probable the end.

In the past we've had two or three 700%+ blocks but there was pretty much the top of it. Could we break it again this time, probably. But what's more likely to happen next is a block would arrive before that.

Assuming this is true, we are only or even less than another 50%'ish away Tongue

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1130. (Read 5352229 times)