Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1203. (Read 5352229 times)

I'll add a reminder about that also from another recent post.

The number that matters about polling the API to see if a miner is OK, is the time since last share accepted "w_lastshareacc:N"

Here's the first worker from my API call

For any single miner, 60 seconds since last share would be the time to send an alert.
So in the above when "STAMP":"1476575097" - "w_lastshareacc:0":"1476575092" is >= 60

For a single miner, 30s is expected to happen, on average, 3 times a day.
60s is expected to happen, on average, about once every 7 years per miner.

See more details here: (and why you may want to use 120s)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15998156

Edit: notice that there are 2 fields "w_lastshareacc:N" and "w_lastshare:N"
The "w_lastshareacc:N" field is the important one, since if your miner goes into convulsions and starts sending unacceptable shares, the other field will still update.

I remember in 2012 when I was new and asking questions .

Been here a while now. Less questions to ask.i know your setup a bit more.

Come on BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!  

EDIT: The pool needs more JUICE! Like about 10PH more. This is the lowest it's been since I've been a member.

Phil is correct.

This is actually a rather important distinction about the web data I provide vs certain other pools.

If anyone used my S1/S2/S3 releases they will have seen I added at the top of the data a number "Paid GH/s"
This is the only number that matters when you mine everywhere, and it's based on accepted shares.

On the web pages: the Rewards, Shifts, Shift Graph, Pool Graph are all exact numbers, not estimates.
They are what you are paid.
"Hash Rate" here and on any pool is an estimate, not 'exactly' what you are being paid.

It doesn't matter whose version of cgminer you run, or what pool you look at, it's not the "Hash Rate" estimate that matters, what matters is the Accepted shares over each time frame you are rewarded.
The Shifts page shows that the best, and the Shift Graph is a visual display of that same data.

There shouldn't be a "right spot to look". I pulled the data from the API, so it should reflect as accurately as the graph. It's raw data.

 not the right spot to look

look here  see what you have. notice I had a drop  on the left .

 I still was paid  the drop was short/

Interesting observation of how being offline for one hour affected my hashrate according to Kano:

10/15/2016 13:00:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.277TH/s | 1 hour: 12.767TH/s | 24 hour: 12.683TH/s
10/15/2016 13:10:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 12.460TH/s | 1 hour: 12.682TH/s | 24 hour: 12.680TH/s
10/15/2016 13:20:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.855TH/s | 1 hour: 12.800TH/s | 24 hour: 12.685TH/s
10/15/2016 13:30:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 12.804TH/s | 1 hour: 12.806TH/s | 24 hour: 12.686TH/s <- Last 10min check where I'm hashing at 100%
10/15/2016 13:40:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 8.457TH/s | 1 hour: 12.192TH/s | 24 hour: 12.660TH/s <- one blade appears to have failed
10/15/2016 13:50:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 8.457TH/s | 1 hour: 12.192TH/s | 24 hour: 12.660TH/s <- continued with 2 blades
wobbzz hashrate is below desired average. <- pushover notification arrived with the next API check below
10/15/2016 14:00:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 0.000TH/s | 1 hour: 0.000TH/s | 24 hour: 0.000TH/s <- miner stopped hashing between 1350 and 1400
10/15/2016 14:10:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 0.000TH/s | 1 hour: 0.000TH/s | 24 hour: 0.000TH/s <- apparently I
10/15/2016 14:20:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 0.000TH/s | 1 hour: 0.000TH/s | 24 hour: 0.000TH/s <- wasn't mining
10/15/2016 14:30:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 0.000TH/s | 1 hour: 0.000TH/s | 24 hour: 0.000TH/s <- for the last
10/15/2016 14:40:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 0.000TH/s | 1 hour: 0.000TH/s | 24 hour: 0.000TH/s <- 24 hours
10/15/2016 14:50:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 0.000TH/s | 1 hour: 0.000TH/s | 24 hour: 0.000TH/s <- Rebooted miner at 1452
10/15/2016 15:00:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 10.264TH/s | 1 hour: 4.853TH/s | 24 hour: 12.035TH/s <- 24 hour hashrate credit comes back
10/15/2016 15:10:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 12.710TH/s | 1 hour: 5.884TH/s | 24 hour: 12.035TH/s
10/15/2016 15:20:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.072TH/s | 1 hour: 7.132TH/s | 24 hour: 12.048TH/s
10/15/2016 15:30:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 14.233TH/s | 1 hour: 8.092TH/s | 24 hour: 12.055TH/s
10/15/2016 15:40:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 12.888TH/s | 1 hour: 8.708TH/s | 24 hour: 12.057TH/s
10/15/2016 15:50:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 14.490TH/s | 1 hour: 9.630TH/s | 24 hour: 12.075TH/s
10/15/2016 16:00:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 14.228TH/s | 1 hour: 10.234TH/s | 24 hour: 12.084TH/s
10/15/2016 16:10:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.025TH/s | 1 hour: 10.634TH/s | 24 hour: 12.091TH/s
10/15/2016 16:20:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.042TH/s | 1 hour: 10.859TH/s | 24 hour: 12.090TH/s
10/15/2016 16:30:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.065TH/s | 1 hour: 11.138TH/s | 24 hour: 12.093TH/s
10/15/2016 16:40:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 12.104TH/s | 1 hour: 11.164TH/s | 24 hour: 12.088TH/s
10/15/2016 16:50:02 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 13.308TH/s | 1 hour: 11.338TH/s | 24 hour: 12.088TH/s
10/15/2016 17:00:01 - Worker: wobbzz | 5 min: 12.559TH/s | 1 hour: 11.612TH/s | 24 hour: 12.096TH/s <- 2 hours later my 1hr hashrate not correct.

I don't fully understand PPLNS and don't have the time to research it right now. Does this seem correct? Would I have been paid out for 2+ blocks if they were found within the window where Kano shows my 24hr hash rate as 0?

Did we lose out Purple Teddy bear in the red block Drama 

You're welcome, Rob. I have to agree. I've been involved with BTC since the beginning, thought I knew a lot, ended up losing a lot (for that time), and found this little alcove of practical magick last year. I continue to learn every day here.

Mine on...

Just wanted to report back that I am seeing payouts!!!  Thank you all for the help, really made it easy to understand.  Been learning more in the past month then I have in all my years...Love it!!!

Lost Internet for over an hour this morning...hate it when that happens...OTOH, it makes it so I can run the shop vac in the LR/data center and not blow the main...

https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks
All - Last 1516 Blocks

Hello Kano,

How many blocks has been found on this pool from the begining, 9.2014 I think.

Thanks!

Since the pool started, luckyant has a BDR of ~4.5 and has found 9 blocks ... so I'm certainly glad they mine on the pool, since they've found ~twice as many blocks as expected ...

Block!

By 1J8uKcVzRy5HyEmSxprsR8FndqUiWynYtx and he is a 56TH miner and his first block.

Welcome to the acclaim board

sorry but I am anticipating an additional luckyant 32,247.96THs of suck but minimal blow here

so half of the next Kano CKPool blocks are going to LuckyAnt - yeah right.

Hope I'm wrong

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/14XnY9k8nEN5YgaBJKixbyQenSf4fpiTc3/transactions

They are not in order, look below.

I run my home testing, alternate server testing and pool server all off the public git.
No reason to have multiple gits for the way the code is at the moment.

The distributed ckdb changes will prolly not be completely public though.
If you want to run a pool, there's all you need in the public git, but if you want to run a large, distributed around the planet pool, that wont be all there (I'll probably just have one file basically empty/different for that)

I am pretty sure they (kano & ck) would update the public code repository, so any new changes are public.  In other words, I believe Bitclub or anyone else can get the updates.  

Cюдa зaглядывaл?
https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/topic/16887-kano-ckpool-%E2%80%93-wwwkanois/