Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 146. (Read 5352229 times)

copper member
Activity: 232
Merit: 2
Can I already add my dragons, kano ?
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 5
no it doesn't have to be open all the time.
Yep it uses electrum's servers to validate the block chain - the wallet doesn't do it.

i.e. you have to trust electrum 100% ...

what else then?
Heh - well ... if you ask me I'll always say a full node running on linux Smiley

nothing for win for a temp use. I am very illiterate in Linux and currently can't set aside Linux comp.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
no it doesn't have to be open all the time.
Yep it uses electrum's servers to validate the block chain - the wallet doesn't do it.

i.e. you have to trust electrum 100% ...

what else then?
Heh - well ... if you ask me I'll always say a full node running on linux Smiley
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 5
no it doesn't have to be open all the time.
Yep it uses electrum's servers to validate the block chain - the wallet doesn't do it.

i.e. you have to trust electrum 100% ...

what else then?
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
no it doesn't have to be open all the time.
Yep it uses electrum's servers to validate the block chain - the wallet doesn't do it.

i.e. you have to trust electrum 100% ...
full member
Activity: 500
Merit: 105
no it doesn't have to be open all the time.
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 5
Ok, have been using bitfinex for a wallet and I would like something else. Do please recommend either wallet or another exchange which hasn't been hacked.

Electrum

Thanks dude. And has to be open all time, right?
full member
Activity: 500
Merit: 105
Ok, have been using bitfinex for a wallet and I would like something else. Do please recommend either wallet or another exchange which hasn't been hacked.

Electrum
jr. member
Activity: 238
Merit: 5
Ok, have been using bitfinex for a wallet and I would like something else. Do please recommend either wallet or another exchange which hasn't been hacked.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Happy Independence Day Eve BTClock!

Keep 'em rollin'!
Happy Independence Day from Scotland to all our American friends now lets free some BTClocks
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 16
1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)
...core changed it so that the fee calculation for a normal transaction is 4 times the fee calculation for a segwit transaction.
So, if I use the address that starts with a 3, then it's only 250 Sat/byte vs. the usual 1000?

Edit: If that's the case, it seems to make sense--and cents Wink--to mine to a segwit address for at least the consolidating process...
newbie
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
How does one know or find out when it is a good time to consolidate transactions?

I've heard others say they can control their cost by having an option or something?
Currently 1 sat/byte will settle in under 1.5 hours!
Has anyone been able to find out how these bytes are measured? Is it the more inputs and/or BTC that drives the size of the transaction up?


inputs, has nothing to do with the actual amount of BTC   1 input of 1BTC is the same as 1 unit of 100BTC

Thanks for the info folks!  But I'm still stuck on Exodus and going to have to pay high transaction fees... They have no options to pick from as far as fees.  That said, when or if would be the best time to consolidate?  sounds like I'm going to get it anyway right, no matter what unless transaction fees go down?  Should I just hold there and wait?  How often do they drop to the lower rates?  I need a really easy SAFE, SECURE wallet for mining proceeds that I can set the fees with as I want to consolidate weekly or at least every couple of weeks...

I have a Nano S9 but it is acting up.  Nervous to do anything there...Can that be recovered if Nano S9 goes bad?  Just seems flaky...

Still scratching my head on what to do and when to do it...lol

Mine on with KANO-SAN!
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 16
1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)
Happy Independence Day Eve BTClock!

Keep 'em rollin'!
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 158
#takeminingback
BTCamm!!! Great start this month!!!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Block! by AsogAKBTC Smiley
Welcome to the Acclaim board with your 1st KanoPool block Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Yes transaction fees are based on the byte size of the transaction - which is of course totally unrelated to the amount of BTC used.
A single input of say 60 bytes can be the same size no matter how much the actual BTC is.
The number of inputs and outputs will determine the size of the transaction.

The number of inputs would e.g. be the number of payouts you are consolidating - irrelevant of the amount of BTC in each payout.
The number of outputs when consolidating would normally be 1 and usually be 2 when paying someone: a) payment and b) the change.

Then just to really piss all the pools and miners off - core changed it so that the fee calculation for a normal transaction is 4 times the fee calculation for a segwit transaction.
Centralisation at it's best.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 16
1xA921 + 1xA741 + Backup-->1xA6 ;)
inputs[.] [It] has nothing to do with the actual amount of BTC   1 input of 1BTC is the same as 1 unit of 100BTC
So, are you saying though that the 100BTC would have a high fee, then?
Not if it is consolidated into a single transaction.  It can be a million BTC or 100 satoshis and it is still based on the number of transactions.  If you transfer .00001 BTC that is made up of 4 transactions, it would cost 4 times the fee of a million BTC with one transaction.  It is totally strange how it works - and that is why it is important to consolidate when the fees are low (and you do not care if it takes a few weeks to get merged together into one transaction).  There is nothing worse than having the market go crazy and needing to pay for something with more transaction fees than what you are trying to send due to lots of small mining transactions...  
Ahh, so I must've interpreted Rifleman's answer wrong. I suppose I should've read it with the above red font changes.

Thanks all!
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 21
4 s9's 2 821's
Has anyone been able to find out how these bytes are measured? Is it the more inputs and/or BTC that drives the size of the transaction up?
inputs, has nothing to do with the actual amount of BTC   1 input of 1BTC is the same as 1 unit of 100BTC
So, are you saying though that the 100BTC would have a high fee, then?

Not if it's one input.   1 input of 1 BTC is the same in fees as 1 input of 500 BTC.   
member
Activity: 285
Merit: 10
Free mining equipment tracking and reporting
inputs, has nothing to do with the actual amount of BTC   1 input of 1BTC is the same as 1 unit of 100BTC
So, are you saying though that the 100BTC would have a high fee, then?
Not if it is consolidated into a single transaction.  It can be a million BTC or 100 satoshis and it is still based on the number of transactions.  If you transfer .00001 BTC that is made up of 4 transactions, it would cost 4 times the fee of a million BTC with one transaction.  It is totally strange how it works - and that is why it is important to consolidate when the fees are low (and you do not care if it takes a few weeks to get merged together into one transaction).  There is nothing worse than having the market go crazy and needing to pay for something with more transaction fees than what you are trying to send due to lots of small mining transactions... 
Jump to: