Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 1664. (Read 5352367 times)
March 03, 2016, 09:01:51 AM
We're just glad he is here with us on Kano! I'm guessing but it looks like he is sitting on 0.0031 on the WestHash side and that is possibly at 0.0030 on the NiceHash side also. Those prices make money if the payouts hit > 100% and we know that this pool typically goes higher than that.
March 03, 2016, 08:56:17 AM
I'm sure numbers have been crunched since that size rental is no cheap
March 03, 2016, 08:54:05 AM
He's drunk?
He want that a6 so badly?
He throw at the wrong pool?
Idk... But it's something good to us.
:3
Not sure that's true. He want that a6 so badly?
He throw at the wrong pool?
Idk... But it's something good to us.
:3
March 03, 2016, 08:52:10 AM
He's drunk?
He want that a6 so badly?
He throw at the wrong pool?
Idk... But it's something good to us.
:3
He want that a6 so badly?
He throw at the wrong pool?
Idk... But it's something good to us.
:3
March 03, 2016, 08:48:08 AM
Rofl. Look at Steve2s rental. SMH.
March 03, 2016, 08:40:39 AM
it never hurts to ask. There are plenty of people on the pool more then willing to help and if no one knows then im sure kano/ck will chime in.
The only stupid question is one not asked.
The only stupid question is one not asked.
March 03, 2016, 08:34:53 AM
ok thank u .sorry i am asking stupid things but i am new and i have red so many thinks in the forum i got confused about some things.
March 03, 2016, 08:26:08 AM
when i get a rewart fromkano in how much time is it visible in my wallet?
takes 101 confirms give me a minute I will show
400956 has 7 confirms so in 94 blocks or about 16 hours
400940 has 23 confirms so in 78 blocks or about 14 hours
400880 has 83 confirms so in 18 blocks or about 3 hours
he does them manually and he does bunch the close ones at times.
So 400880 he may do in 3-5 hours.
But 40094 and 400956 he may wait for both and send them in 16-18 hours.
Slow block making days slow the process of confirms so a 170 block day you get paid quicker then a 120 block day
March 03, 2016, 08:24:23 AM
when i get a rewart fromkano in how much time is it visible in my wallet?
March 03, 2016, 08:21:03 AM
steve2 holy crap 11ph on the pool baby! nh locked at .0031! Very nice.
March 03, 2016, 07:56:48 AM
Hmm, one of my S7s shows it found 5 blocks over night. 
Must have been on my back (ie:NH) up during the 7 min restart? But, man that would have been nice for all of us if it had found them here. 
Must have been on my back (ie:NH) up during the 7 min restart? But, man that would have been nice for all of us if it had found them here. March 03, 2016, 07:12:17 AM
Thank you. These long blocks are starting to give me ulcers... And all the chicken I'm eating is getting me fat.
March 03, 2016, 07:09:02 AM
this is a nice wake up 
March 03, 2016, 07:03:12 AM
... and now a second block in the running for the A6 
Saad with ~9THs avg red line
Saad with ~9THs avg red line
March 03, 2016, 06:01:02 AM
I see that steve has unleashed the Kraken (9 PH) 
March 03, 2016, 05:33:58 AM
...
There will also be a CKDB restart much later today to add in the code to track high diff shares in the database.
I've been checking this manually using the logs, but of course having the code do it is better
I'll post again when I push that update and am ready to restart CKDB, it's early morning here now, that update will be this afternoon.
I will be doing this in the next couple of minutes since it's optimal to do it now and will be very quick due to the timing of the last shift summarisation.There will also be a CKDB restart much later today to add in the code to track high diff shares in the database.
I've been checking this manually using the logs, but of course having the code do it is better
I'll post again when I push that update and am ready to restart CKDB, it's early morning here now, that update will be this afternoon.
NO miners will be affected.
I'm adding in the DB storage of high diff shares to simplify checking miners.
7 minutesNo miners were affected.
March 03, 2016, 04:22:11 AM
Another block by one of the big miners - canaan
... and unlike other pools, we've always tried to confirm our pool payouts as we did with this block
... and unlike other pools, we've always tried to confirm our pool payouts as we did with this block
March 02, 2016, 11:52:33 PM
...
Is 10% a goal or some self imposed max size?
In an ideal world, all pools would be smaller than 10%. However, that isn't the world we live in. As long as there are pools that control ~ 25% of the hashrate, I can't see any reason why you guys shouldn't be one of them. Please don't say 10% will be some self imposed limit!
Is 10% a goal or some self imposed max size?
In an ideal world, all pools would be smaller than 10%. However, that isn't the world we live in. As long as there are pools that control ~ 25% of the hashrate, I can't see any reason why you guys shouldn't be one of them. Please don't say 10% will be some self imposed limit!
Self imposed limit. At this point we'd have to more than triple in size before we'd be at 10% There is quite a while before we get there
What do you then? Close the registrations and thus growth would be limited to the big players that keep expanding that are already registered?
Yeah just kidding.
But the point would be that indeed, I would close the registrations.
After that we'd see how it grows with the user base we have, vs difficulty.
It's certainly not a hard limit that has no flexibility, but it is a limit at which I would intervene.
i.e. we'd never get to 15% unless someone with a VERY large hash rate was already a member of the pool and pointed that VERY large hash rate here instead of somewhere else.
After 10%, if over time we started heading back towards 9% then I'd allow registrations again.
I'm not gonna force people off the pool, but I don't want the pool to keep rapidly expanding once we reach 10%
And your reasons for this are the belief in the importance in distribution of the hash rate? (Either that or Infrastructure i guess)
It sound like a good thing but that probably mean more hashrate for China, after we reach 10%, assuming we reach 10%. It would be a good example that probably would not be followed. I think the predominant desire in most pool operators is Greed.
Then again all you can do is your best.
March 02, 2016, 11:21:53 PM
...
Is 10% a goal or some self imposed max size?
In an ideal world, all pools would be smaller than 10%. However, that isn't the world we live in. As long as there are pools that control ~ 25% of the hashrate, I can't see any reason why you guys shouldn't be one of them. Please don't say 10% will be some self imposed limit!
Is 10% a goal or some self imposed max size?
In an ideal world, all pools would be smaller than 10%. However, that isn't the world we live in. As long as there are pools that control ~ 25% of the hashrate, I can't see any reason why you guys shouldn't be one of them. Please don't say 10% will be some self imposed limit!
Self imposed limit. At this point we'd have to more than triple in size before we'd be at 10% There is quite a while before we get there
What do you then? Close the registrations and thus growth would be limited to the big players that keep expanding that are already registered?
Yeah just kidding.
But the point would be that indeed, I would close the registrations.
After that we'd see how it grows with the user base we have, vs difficulty.
It's certainly not a hard limit that has no flexibility, but it is a limit at which I would intervene.
i.e. we'd never get to 15% unless someone with a VERY large hash rate was already a member of the pool and pointed that VERY large hash rate here instead of somewhere else.
After 10%, if over time we started heading back towards 9% then I'd allow registrations again.
I'm not gonna force people off the pool, but I don't want the pool to keep rapidly expanding once we reach 10%
March 02, 2016, 10:46:48 PM
nah the logistics to grow a mining farm from lets 100 th/s to 1 ph/s is is is i can't type it out
Jump to: