Payout 347726 sent
b42881da218d5752bb2a4b72a1c027f10b80f45962d41ae6411d0debda1a33bb
and confirmed
b42881da218d5752bb2a4b72a1c027f10b80f45962d41ae6411d0debda1a33bb
and confirmed
Ta
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2130. (Read 5352119 times)
March 16, 2015, 04:08:31 AM
Ta
March 16, 2015, 03:15:46 AM
Payout 347726 sent
b42881da218d5752bb2a4b72a1c027f10b80f45962d41ae6411d0debda1a33bb
and confirmed
b42881da218d5752bb2a4b72a1c027f10b80f45962d41ae6411d0debda1a33bb
and confirmed
March 15, 2015, 07:40:07 PM
Yes, looks better now with only one worker name.
Will run this way for the next days and will see what happen.
Looks realy that my proxy have problem on your pool, when i connect with seperate name for each miner.
But the performance on the other pools was more better ( less invalide hashs) this way, because each worker get less difficulty.
I only use the proxy for easy pool management switch/backub .
Trafic is no problem for me.
Thanks and good night.
Best Regards
Tinu
Difficulty is unrelated to Reject% Will run this way for the next days and will see what happen.
Looks realy that my proxy have problem on your pool, when i connect with seperate name for each miner.
But the performance on the other pools was more better ( less invalide hashs) this way, because each worker get less difficulty.
I only use the proxy for easy pool management switch/backub .
Trafic is no problem for me.
Thanks and good night.
Best Regards
Tinu
March 15, 2015, 07:10:22 PM
Yes, looks better now with only one worker name.
Will run this way for the next days and will see what happen.
Looks realy that my proxy have problem on your pool, when i connect with seperate name for each miner.
But the performance on the other pools was more better ( less invalide hashs) this way, because each worker get less difficulty.
I only use the proxy for easy pool management switch/backub .
Trafic is no problem for me.
Thanks and good night.
Best Regards
Tinu
Will run this way for the next days and will see what happen.
Looks realy that my proxy have problem on your pool, when i connect with seperate name for each miner.
But the performance on the other pools was more better ( less invalide hashs) this way, because each worker get less difficulty.
I only use the proxy for easy pool management switch/backub .
Trafic is no problem for me.
Thanks and good night.
Best Regards
Tinu
March 15, 2015, 07:00:49 PM
Yeah it's the same as having cgminer connect and make a stratum socket connection for mining, then half way through that suddenly decide to send a new worker name over the same stratum worker connection.
To connect 2 workers to a pool you make 2 stratum connections, it's a complete misunderstanding of the permanent single socket connection of how stratum works. Get the proxy writer to fix their code since it makes no sense over a single connection.
To connect 2 workers to a pool you make 2 stratum connections, it's a complete misunderstanding of the permanent single socket connection of how stratum works. Get the proxy writer to fix their code since it makes no sense over a single connection.
March 15, 2015, 06:54:01 PM
What i find out now is, when i connect with seperate worker names over the proxy, i get problems on your pool.
If i connect only with one worker name....seems no connection problems. (Beside still high invalide hashs)
Is there an how to instal CKproxy "for dummys"?
Then your proxy is doing something inappropriate and trying to authorise multiple times as different workers on the same connection. If you can work around it by using the same worker names there's no need to go with ckproxy. Ckproxy absolutely needs linux but is very easy to set up. Check my sig for the ckpool/ckproxy thread where you can discuss it. If i connect only with one worker name....seems no connection problems. (Beside still high invalide hashs)
Is there an how to instal CKproxy "for dummys"?
March 15, 2015, 06:38:29 PM
Are these S4's using older firmware? The controller crashes on low diff
No, throttled X3's and KNC Jupiter's to get a better efficiency.Had no problem till now.
Just wanted to support the pool of Kano and Con to appreciate their work in the community.
But if it does not work with my configuration then it is just so.
March 15, 2015, 06:35:56 PM
Your Shifts screen will show you ~300GHs for many hours before I blocked the IP
The console log also shows ~300GHs for many hours before I blocked it (2015-03-12 11:35 UTC)
I can only guess that whatever the proxy bug was, it was also stopping you mining most of your hashes.
I can see now you are back up and mining and stats show over 6THs so far.
What i find out now is, when i connect with seperate worker names over the proxy, i get problems on your pool.The console log also shows ~300GHs for many hours before I blocked it (2015-03-12 11:35 UTC)
I can only guess that whatever the proxy bug was, it was also stopping you mining most of your hashes.
I can see now you are back up and mining and stats show over 6THs so far.
If i connect only with one worker name....seems no connection problems. (Beside still high invalide hashs)
Is there an how to instal CKproxy "for dummys"?
March 15, 2015, 06:25:35 PM
Are these S4's using older firmware? The controller crashes on low diff
March 15, 2015, 06:20:29 PM
Append worker's name
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
23 miners doing ~300GHs?Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Pool's working fine. Your IP was probably blocked for some reason (usually repeated failed authorisation attempts is the reason).Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
Anyway, it was spamming the console with multiple authorisation attempts after a successful one, that of course are not valid.
At 300GHs it was easy to assume one miner and stop it.
I guess then you are using some proxy with bugs in it?
Try using ckproxy and that shouldn't happen.
I'll re-enable it, but if it happens again, I'll do the same.
No its 8TH or 16TH
Don't know why its only 300GH
I'm using Stratehm/stratum-proxy and had no problem till now on other pools.
I would use your ckproxy, but don't know how to instal on windows machine.
The console log also shows ~300GHs for many hours before I blocked it (2015-03-12 11:35 UTC)
I can only guess that whatever the proxy bug was, it was also stopping you mining most of your hashes.
I can see now you are back up and mining and stats show over 6THs so far.
March 15, 2015, 05:59:38 PM
Append worker's name
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
23 miners doing ~300GHs?Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Pool's working fine. Your IP was probably blocked for some reason (usually repeated failed authorisation attempts is the reason).Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
Anyway, it was spamming the console with multiple authorisation attempts after a successful one, that of course are not valid.
At 300GHs it was easy to assume one miner and stop it.
I guess then you are using some proxy with bugs in it?
Try using ckproxy and that shouldn't happen.
I'll re-enable it, but if it happens again, I'll do the same.
No its 8TH or 16TH
Don't know why its only 300GH
I'm using Stratehm/stratum-proxy and had no problem till now on other pools.
I would use your ckproxy, but don't know how to instal on windows machine.
March 15, 2015, 05:57:05 PM
Append worker's name
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
23 miners doing ~300GHs?Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Pool's working fine. Your IP was probably blocked for some reason (usually repeated failed authorisation attempts is the reason).Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
Anyway, it was spamming the console with multiple authorisation attempts after a successful one, that of course are not valid.
At 300GHs it was easy to assume one miner and stop it.
I guess then you are using some proxy with bugs in it?
Try using ckproxy and that shouldn't happen.
I'll re-enable it, but if it happens again, I'll do the same.
March 15, 2015, 04:41:33 PM
Append worker's name
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Pool's working fine. Your IP was probably blocked for some reason (usually repeated failed authorisation attempts is the reason).Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Thanks Con for the Info.
Failed authorisation? How many i need for blocking?
I had 23 Miners over stratum proxy and the same IP on the pool.
But with "Append worker's name" for each miner.
The only problems on the pool I had was with enabled extranonce subscribt.
Who can unlock the Ip now?
March 15, 2015, 04:27:53 PM
Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Pool's working fine. Your IP was probably blocked for some reason (usually repeated failed authorisation attempts is the reason). PM Kano your username and IP address and he can look into it. Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
March 15, 2015, 04:24:14 PM
Hi
Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Any Idee?
Regards
Tinu
Since 4 days, I can't reach the pool anymore.
Not the Website, not the pool, nothing.
Before I was connect with over 20 miners without problems!
And then....whole connection to kano.is dead.
If I ping the site (www.kano.is / 104.194.28.194) I get only "Request timed out"
Any Idee?
Regards
Tinu
March 15, 2015, 04:20:44 PM
jonny I agree. My short answer is instead of "luck" think in terms of variance. The question is how to make the variance not as high swings and that short answer in my opinion is to spread your hash over a couple of pools. Then the things to consider are pool fees, size of the pool and integrity of the pool operator.
When you said "integrity" you said it all. March 15, 2015, 03:49:40 PM
PPS pools are targets for hot wallet attacks etc. and have pool debt rewards unpaid and can carry on during long between times of block solving. 50BTC will forever owe me .282151 BTC. PPLNS is pool hopping protection. Large miner can’t swoop in a screw your block reward because it bases off past work contributed usually presented in a shift based form for human consumption.
I always looked at block solving LUCK as pedestrian vs auto accidents. There are things to mitigate them but they just happen. If I didn’t find this block does it mean the pool would not have? I don’t know. I just try to keep my hardware in good condition, pay for a stupid fast internet connection to minimized rejects, stales, and check threads for updated firmware. SP gear is easy. Updated the S5s and S4’s cut the HW errors down considerably with CGminer 4.8. –thanks CK and Kano.
Decided to run a full node, 9 weeks left of catching up. I am in fairly close proximity to the pools server. Pings are in the 35’s. So maybe it will help in an orphan race.
I have airflow problems with hot weather more or less few weeks away. Against every fiber in my being evaporative coolers are on the way and will be back mining in a few days.
Happy hunting CK pool.
I always looked at block solving LUCK as pedestrian vs auto accidents. There are things to mitigate them but they just happen. If I didn’t find this block does it mean the pool would not have? I don’t know. I just try to keep my hardware in good condition, pay for a stupid fast internet connection to minimized rejects, stales, and check threads for updated firmware. SP gear is easy. Updated the S5s and S4’s cut the HW errors down considerably with CGminer 4.8. –thanks CK and Kano.
Decided to run a full node, 9 weeks left of catching up. I am in fairly close proximity to the pools server. Pings are in the 35’s. So maybe it will help in an orphan race.
I have airflow problems with hot weather more or less few weeks away. Against every fiber in my being evaporative coolers are on the way and will be back mining in a few days.
Happy hunting CK pool.
March 15, 2015, 02:43:06 PM
.....
A question I have is; is there a similar ramp-up period with PPS pools? I suspect not. So the benefit for the members of Kano come after mining with the pool for a longer duration because fees are lower here than with PPS pools. Is that correct?
A question I have is; is there a similar ramp-up period with PPS pools? I suspect not. So the benefit for the members of Kano come after mining with the pool for a longer duration because fees are lower here than with PPS pools. Is that correct?
All pools have a ramp up time, be it NOT the same length as Kano's. Suffice to say the ramp up time at kano is the longest I have ever seen / experienced anywhere! Saying that, it commensurately is the longest I have ever seen anywhere ramping down, thus you'll keep earning from any blocks found (if any) by the pool after you've stopped hashing for the duration it takes for your ramping down to nothing.
Saying that, at Slush (for example) the ramp up time is quite quick, but the ramp down time is twice as quick (if not faster!).
March 15, 2015, 02:26:30 PM
.....
A question I have is; is there a similar ramp-up period with PPS pools? I suspect not. So the benefit for the members of Kano come after mining with the pool for a longer duration because fees are lower here than with PPS pools. Is that correct?
A question I have is; is there a similar ramp-up period with PPS pools? I suspect not. So the benefit for the members of Kano come after mining with the pool for a longer duration because fees are lower here than with PPS pools. Is that correct?
All pools have a ramp up time, be it NOT the same length as Kano's. Suffice to say the ramp up time at kano is the longest I have ever seen / experienced anywhere! Saying that, it commensurately is the longest I have ever seen anywhere ramping down, thus you'll keep earning from any blocks found (if any) by the pool after you've stopped hashing for the duration it takes for your ramping down to nothing.
Saying that, at Slush (for example) the ramp up time is quite quick, but the ramp down time is twice as quick (if not faster!).
March 15, 2015, 02:08:14 PM
I hope my questions have been specific, and sorry in advance for the wall of text. If you are going to respond negatively please do so via PM so we may have a mature discussion.
We go through good days and bad days, but not "luck" to me anymore.
I have never been concerned over Friday the 13th, black cats, or other such things, but there was always something about winning a game of chance enough then expecting a loss, or losing enough and expecting a win.
Through many posts on this forum, and specifically reading this entire thread when I first joined I throw it all out the window.
As I was taught here, luck can be something in the past, but I never expect luck to have any impact on anything. It simply is not real, it is more akin to Santa Claus or the monsters in your closet.
Math is real, calculated probability, but not a dependence of blind luck.
.....
We go through good days and bad days, but not "luck" to me anymore.
I have never been concerned over Friday the 13th, black cats, or other such things, but there was always something about winning a game of chance enough then expecting a loss, or losing enough and expecting a win.
Through many posts on this forum, and specifically reading this entire thread when I first joined I throw it all out the window.
As I was taught here, luck can be something in the past, but I never expect luck to have any impact on anything. It simply is not real, it is more akin to Santa Claus or the monsters in your closet.
Math is real, calculated probability, but not a dependence of blind luck.
.....
My comment about Friday the 13th was tongue-in-cheek. I'm not superstitious in the slightest.
Mining is essentially like playing the lottery. There is no luck, just randomness and probability like you mentioned. It would be like joining an office lottery pool. You have a higher probability of winning but the proceeds are shared between members. You could do the math for the lottery too - over a really ass long time, probability dictates your profit will be the same whether you are in the pool or buying tickets alone. Though we wouldn't live long enough to see that due to the insanely low odds of winning the lottery.
A question I have is; is there a similar ramp-up period with PPS pools? I suspect not. So the benefit for the members of Kano come after mining with the pool for a longer duration because fees are lower here than with PPS pools. Is that correct?
Jump to: