I hope my questions have been specific, and sorry in advance for the wall of text. If you are going to respond negatively please do so via PM so we may have a mature discussion.
We go through good days and bad days, but not "luck" to me anymore.
I have never been concerned over Friday the 13th, black cats, or other such things, but there was always something about winning a game of chance enough then expecting a loss, or losing enough and expecting a win.
Through many posts on this forum, and specifically reading this entire thread when I first joined I throw it all out the window.
As I was taught here, luck can be something in the past, but I never expect luck to have any impact on anything. It simply is not real, it is more akin to Santa Claus or the monsters in your closet.
Math is real, calculated probability, but not a dependence of blind luck.
I suppose there is not a better term to describe a 40 hour block or a 4.5 minute one though is there? To keep things simple we call it lucky or unlucky, but isn't it truly random?
What can a new miner do to increase the odds they are successful?
Successful at what? We must be specific. If we ask to be successful at solo mining and winning the block reward we get few answers.
Successful at completing the assigned work from the pool and running an efficient piece of mining hardware is probably a better question, but still general. There are hardware and software points to address.
Someone bringing enough hash to the pool to put it at 4PH but not over 8PH has been said to raise the probability of more immediate rewards, but the way it has been explained to me countless times is it averages out regardless. Lower hashrate = less people to share the rewards with, right?
Is that right? I am getting to my question.
I understand there are probabilities involved but I never claim to be a great mathematician. I think there must be a high and low end of the rewards being "averaged" if a set amount of time is included, otherwise everyone would solo mine? Not everyone, there are people who must have the large pool for the lowest variance to pay there bills, but otherwise if it all averaged out why wouldn't more people solo mine with all of their gear? So maybe it averages out over 60 years, but drop that to 6 years, or 12 months. If no one can predict what will happen in those 12 months, yet we all say "it all averages out", what time variable is that based on?
I am confident there are people here who have not only been mining longer, but that have a much better understanding of the entire process and their length of mining time or writing code has shown them these things do average over time.
I am looking for something to help me understand these things and correct any misconceptions I may have. If there is a resource somewhere else, or a thread here on this forum I have been unable to find it. The best I have found have been discussions on one pool versus another, but there are too many variables outside pure probability and time, EG the pool operator being transparent, types of payment methods (some impossible to maintain), the things most of us have no control over. I'm not saying we control probability or time, but I hope to understand those things more without the noise of the other.
There are very few answers for me outside of the standard "set it and forget it!" which may be the best thing for any miner, but I do not want to forget it, I want to understand each piece of the puzzle. Not in attempts to mine more coin, but to understand how it works and have dialog which could help more new miners understand luck has nothing and everything to do with rewards and here is why. Rewards average out over X amount of time and here is why, and maybe even further to "people with 1PH or more may switch pools to chase a contest for 1 or 2 BTC at another pool for what reasons? Is that truly worth it? Many of the 1 PH miners I see switching are renting their hash out. Depending on the amounts they rent for, they may be making it very much worth it, but, It would seem from everything I have learned so far switching back and forth could cause them much lower rewards from this or any other pool, but does it really? Renting rates are another variable I understand, so throw it out the window as well for what I am after.
Is there an amount of mining power / hashrate where the variance is minimized over X amount of time? And further is there an amount if hashrate you may own where adding 1TH to that amount is likely to garner more reward than 1 person connecting 1 TH, say miner A has 1PH, adds 1 TH and we only count the reward for that single TH they added, versus Miner B simply connecting with 1 TH. If only counting the 1 TH over the 1 PH from miner A against the 1 TH from miner B they should receive equal rewards.
In this scenario I am not including the fact that both A and B are paying for some of the same infrastructure or other variables such as that, but strictly about probability, and where applicable time.
When I am told "it all averages out", what time variable is used in that statement, or what are all of the variables used to form that conclusion? I am mainly focused on time, but anyone feel free to carry it as far and include whatever you wish. I hope to keep it more simply because I have learned about most? variables, I think I have anyway. Time is the one I am trying to understand now.
I hope this post shows only my wish to learn more, and help teach others. I want to help eradicate common misconceptions in my own train of thought, and many of which are human nature. By doing so hope to help others joining our community. I want people to buy Bitcoin, I do not recommend new people to jump at mining, but if someone asks me about luck and probability I want to be able to provide better explanations than I do at the moment, along with "it averages out", and "set it and forget it". While both true there are many people turned off by such short responses, and people like me who generally wish to understand "how it works".