Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2197. (Read 5352747 times)

legendary
Activity: 4382
Merit: 9330
'The right to privacy matters'
Heh I did actually have some code to solve this - so I fired up the command and it's now fixed.
71.65% - another sub 100% Smiley

https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/43dc33a54caefc130570d403d8f95e89efa88c04/src/ckdb_cmd.c?at=master#cl-1003
Ever better Cheesy it was actually 36.83%

In case anyone was curious, the confirm set the block to the current in code numbers, but then a later check, resets them to the correct numbers based on the blocks range.

So this will also affect the next block (unless I restart ckdb before that)
It will show up as about 35% below what it really is on the web page and the first confirm stage.
But it will correct it about 20 seconds later with the correct values.
So until we get the next block, that number at the top will be about 35% below what it really is.

Either way 3 quick blocks are nice.

 I did some fast math.  pool has about 4000th right now

pull out the top 4 as they are too high pool drops from 4000th to 568 th

pull out ck and kano pool drops to 558  th  pull out the bottom under 800gh

  and the remaining qualified to win people have about 550th running  so if you are running 2 sp20's at 2.5 th you have  2.5/550 chance to win. or about 220 to one.

if you are running 1 sp20 at 1.4th you have around a 400 to 1 chance to win.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Heh I did actually have some code to solve this - so I fired up the command and it's now fixed.
71.65% - another sub 100% Smiley

https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/43dc33a54caefc130570d403d8f95e89efa88c04/src/ckdb_cmd.c?at=master#cl-1003
Ever better Cheesy it was actually 36.83%

In case anyone was curious, the confirm set the block to the current in code numbers, but then a later check, resets them to the correct numbers based on the blocks range.

So this will also affect the next block (unless I restart ckdb before that)
It will show up as about 35% below what it really is on the web page and the first confirm stage.
But it will correct it about 20 seconds later with the correct values.
So until we get the next block, that number at the top will be about 35% below what it really is.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
It may be an orphan one  Cry.

it appears on blocktrail dot com as ours and not an orphan. shares are registering, so i think we'll be all right... and of course our pool is ran by 2 of the best tech guys in the community.

Right On!  Grin
Yep we did win block 338787 Smiley
Funny thing is that bitcoind said it was rejected, but the network accepted it.
Will fix it up so that it displays properly of course.
(P.S. yes I was asleep Tongue)
We'll let you get by on this one, but no more of that Sleep Crap,  uhhmmm..K!?
legendary
Activity: 4382
Merit: 9330
'The right to privacy matters'
It may be an orphan one  Cry.

it appears on blocktrail dot com as ours and not an orphan. shares are registering, so i think we'll be all right... and of course our pool is ran by 2 of the best tech guys in the community.

Right On!  Grin
Yep we did win block 338787 Smiley
Funny thing is that bitcoind said it was rejected, but the network accepted it.
In ckdb, blocks go through stages, first stage is "New" (as it shows on the web) then "1-Confirm" once ckpool says bitcoind accepted it.
That 2nd stage didn't happen, so ckdb didn't take the next step of checking the validity of the block.
Of course, this hasn't happened before and I don't handle it in the code, so ckdb thinks it's stuck at "New".
Will fix it up so that it displays properly of course.
(P.S. yes I was asleep Tongue)


Make sure you get plenty of rest bro.  We hit a lot of blocks pretty quickly since the contest started.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
It may be an orphan one  Cry.

it appears on blocktrail dot com as ours and not an orphan. shares are registering, so i think we'll be all right... and of course our pool is ran by 2 of the best tech guys in the community.

Right On!  Grin
Yep we did win block 338787 Smiley
Funny thing is that bitcoind said it was rejected, but the network accepted it.
In ckdb, blocks go through stages, first stage is "New" (as it shows on the web) then "1-Confirm" once ckpool says bitcoind accepted it.
That 2nd stage didn't happen, so ckdb didn't take the next step of checking the validity of the block.
Of course, this hasn't happened before and I don't handle it in the code, so ckdb thinks it's stuck at "New".
Will fix it up so that it displays properly of course.
(P.S. yes I was asleep Tongue)
legendary
Activity: 4382
Merit: 9330
'The right to privacy matters'
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003
It may be an orphan one  Cry.

it appears on blocktrail dot com as ours and not an orphan. shares are registering, so i think we'll be all right... and of course our pool is ran by 2 of the best tech guys in the community.

Right On!  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
It may be an orphan one  Cry.

it appears on blocktrail dot com as ours and not an orphan. shares are registering, so i think we'll be all right... and of course our pool is ran by 2 of the best tech guys in the community.
hero member
Activity: 694
Merit: 501
It may be an orphan one  Cry.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003
The status of block 338787 is stuck on the pool website. Shows it as NEW but over 6 confirms on blockchain.

Yeah, I was noticing the same thing. Strange.
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250

So the winner wil be Lightsword or Bitminerpro....  Grin

The winner wil be SP20winner  Tongue

bwahahaha, quality name whomever did that.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
The status of block 338787 is stuck on the pool website. Shows it as NEW but over 6 confirms on blockchain.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003

So the winner wil be Lightsword or Bitminerpro....  Grin

The winner wil be SP20winner  Tongue

That would be funny if that actually happens.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003

So the winner wil be Lightsword or Bitminerpro....  Grin

The winner wil be SP20winner  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Quote
The winner will be the next person who finds a block, with a single mining account or mining address with between 800GHs and 50THs, between now and the 110th valid pool block - i.e. the next 26 valid blocks.
If no one in the 800GHs to 50THs hash range finds a block by the 110th valid block, then instead, the last person, in that hash range 800GHs to 50THs, who submits the last valid share before valid block 110 is found, will be the winner.

So the winner wil be Lightsword or Bitminerpro....  Grin
They can't Tongue
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Payout 338639 sent and confirmed
full member
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
Quote
The winner will be the next person who finds a block, with a single mining account or mining address with between 800GHs and 50THs, between now and the 110th valid pool block - i.e. the next 26 valid blocks.
If no one in the 800GHs to 50THs hash range finds a block by the 110th valid block, then instead, the last person, in that hash range 800GHs to 50THs, who submits the last valid share before valid block 110 is found, will be the winner.

So the winner wil be Lightsword or Bitminerpro....  Grin
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10

Quote

350 is the default.  Check the S5 thread in Hardware. At stock settings the S5s I have here are to advertised specificaspecifications on 240v, server psu's.

Yes, I've found several reviews of it and will have it tested at Kano's for a night first, hope it would be good.
Thank you Stan.
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
Dear All,
Just a little bit out off the topic but i hope not, have a question about S5, what is the right frequency to be set on this machine? Should i use default freq @200?
Please advice, I've pointed this machine to Kano's at the default freq only.

Thank you.

350 is the default.  Check the S5 thread in Hardware. At stock settings the S5s I have here are to advertised specificaspecifications on 240v, server psu's.
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
Dear All,
Just a little bit out off the topic but i hope not, have a question about S5, what is the right frequency to be set on this machine? Should i use default freq @200?
Please advice, I've pointed this machine to Kano's at the default freq only.

Thank you.
# Solved. It's good at 350. Thank's all.
Jump to: