Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2222. (Read 5352527 times)
November 26, 2014, 03:17:05 PM
Next block will found at: 2014-11-28 09:52:11
November 26, 2014, 02:32:31 PM
Nice! Payout was a little more than I expected and we found another block. It is a good day my friends! 
Same here regarding the payout comment. ck and kano- thank you!!! 
November 26, 2014, 01:23:08 PM
Nice! Payout was a little more than I expected and we found another block. It is a good day my friends!
November 26, 2014, 09:12:09 AM
Block 331574 payout sent out
Visible at the usual blockchain link:
https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrT
Visible at the usual blockchain link:
https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrT
oh yisss 55c/0.00148031 BTC to me!
November 26, 2014, 07:02:08 AM
Block 331574 payout sent out
Visible at the usual blockchain link:
https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrT
Visible at the usual blockchain link:
https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrT
thank you. ps it was nice to see the second one as I just woke up and checked here.
November 26, 2014, 04:38:13 AM
Block 331574 payout sent out
Visible at the usual blockchain link:
https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrT
Visible at the usual blockchain link:
https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrT
November 26, 2014, 01:52:50 AM
November 26, 2014, 01:38:34 AM
November 25, 2014, 10:06:45 PM
Well, anyone looking at the CDF, that 0.98 means that all pools should average one block like that or longer in every ~50 blocks.
That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected.
But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good
69.52% of diff average per block.
i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far.
A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected.
Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more.
That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate.
We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected.
But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good
69.52% of diff average per block.
i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far.
A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected.
Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more.
That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate.
We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
That last block was nothing like the 1st block we mined here. It was 23 days,(very low pool hash rate) but I was paid very well.
Thanks Kano.
November 25, 2014, 08:00:51 PM
Well, anyone looking at the CDF, that 0.98 means that all pools should average one block like that or longer in every ~50 blocks.
That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected.
But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good
69.52% of diff average per block.
i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far.
A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected.
Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more.
That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate.
We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected.
But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good
69.52% of diff average per block.
i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far.
A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected.
Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more.
That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate.
We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
That last block was nothing like the 1st block we mined here. It was 23 days,(very low pool hash rate) but I was paid very well.
Thanks Kano.
November 25, 2014, 06:08:24 PM
Blockchain.info 24hr pool chart looks really bad right now. Even KNC Miner is having bad luck. The Unknowns ruled the roost yesterday!
November 25, 2014, 05:50:08 PM
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
You need 'balls of steel' sometimes to keep with a pool on the long blocks (Apologies to any female miners).
In a very short time frame, this pool is hashing at a rate with the likes of BitMinter (also currently going through a high CDF block - as I write at 93.28%).
Good luck/variance to all ... there will be good times ... and long times.
November 25, 2014, 03:56:17 PM
Well, anyone looking at the CDF, that 0.98 means that all pools should average one block like that or longer in every ~50 blocks.
That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected.
But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good
69.52% of diff average per block.
i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far.
A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected.
Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more.
That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate.
We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected.
But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good
69.52% of diff average per block.
i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far.
A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected.
Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more.
That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate.
We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better
1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better
November 25, 2014, 03:27:12 PM
Yeah about time, and we're up to 1.7PH now.
November 25, 2014, 10:54:20 AM
Woooooooooooooohaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Thank the gods that's over.
Well done everyone for sticking it out.
Thank the gods that's over.
Well done everyone for sticking it out.
better yet 6 confirms
now to all those happy ones. I will mention a pool a while back had .99 and .99 cdf back to back.
So our .98 while brutal could be followed by a few .91's in a row. Or we can rip 3 0.11's
Anyone that has trouble grasping this get a pair of dice. Toss them over and over for 360 tosses. mark only snake eyes. you will find interesting patterns . you should get 10 sets of snake eyes in 360 tosses. 1 set around every 36 tosses. you will find you may vary far from that.
this round of shit luck would be like tossing 150 times before snake eyes turns up
November 25, 2014, 09:42:49 AM
Woooooooooooooohaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Thank the gods that's over.
Well done everyone for sticking it out.
Thank the gods that's over.
Well done everyone for sticking it out.
November 25, 2014, 07:34:40 AM
Sorry, there's some unusual (likely malicious) share submissions going on that are triggering a bug and we're currently working on a fix. There will be another restart shortly.
EDIT: All done, sorry about the inconvenience.
EDIT: All done, sorry about the inconvenience.
November 25, 2014, 06:37:47 AM
Its on its third or fourth restart, I was trying to benchmark CK's new 4.8.0 build and it's all fubard now.
November 25, 2014, 06:34:16 AM
Was there some sort of blip? I see my miner failed over to the godsquad pool for a few minutes, and came back to CKPool, but is showing 0GH. As are a load of other people.
November 25, 2014, 06:17:05 AM
Shhhh.... I saw that. 
Jump to: