Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2226. (Read 5352295 times)

full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 104

Once the pool gets bigger I will of course automate more of those checks, however, they don't take very long, and there will always be a final manual check of the information to help ensure it's correct - for security reasons also.
thumbs up! That is very comforting to know, and I wonder if other larger pools that I won't mention by name practice this as part of their protocol...I really appreciate all the effort and time that you and ck have put into developing this wonderful pool. I know your time is valuable. I just want you guys to know it doesn't go unappreciated.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
I bet you don't get this level of honesty at any other pool.  Smiley




I've said it before and I'll say it again. I have never seen this type of transparency in any other pool, not to mention the level of support from the operators. It take's me a ton of motivation to bill my customers much less pay the bills. My thanks to you Kano and CK I can hardly imagine the amount of time running this pool consumes in relation to rewards. Which is why I plan on staying for the duration, because there's no way you're in it for coin.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
is the payments tab working on the website or work in progress?

Planned, still not begun.
full member
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
is the payments tab working on the website or work in progress?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
I bet you don't get this level of honesty at any other pool.  Smiley


legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Hi all, that yesterday's update has caused an error in the calculation for the payout of the current block - no problem with previous payouts of course.
(see git if you are curious)
I've been working on that last night, but only realised just now as I was doing the payout that the change was incorrect for the new block.
Once it's fixed, I'll post up that I'm doing the payout.
Sorry for the delay, but it's part of the manual step of the payout that I check certain things and thus found this problem.
The aim of the final manual checks (and the last step, manual send) are to help avoid pool funds not getting to their correct destinations.
Once the pool gets bigger I will of course automate more of those checks, however, they don't take very long, and there will always be a final manual check of the information to help ensure it's correct - for security reasons also.
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 104
What happened to Proud Clown he had a ten step plan to becoming a bitcoin billionaire. Sad to see him leave so soon Tongue
I was wondering the same thing... he was rather enthusiastic, and quite frankly his disappearance has me concerned for his well being.. Undecided Wink
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
What happened to Proud Clown he had a ten step plan to becoming a bitcoin billionaire. Sad to see him leave so soon Tongue
Patience must not be one of the steps. Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
What happened to Proud Clown he had a ten step plan to becoming a bitcoin billionaire. Sad to see him leave so soon Tongue
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Thank you Kano for pointing that out. i could see my miners still working but didnt look to see where they were mining.

This is a total newbie question but ... what factors go into making a long 78 +hr block? Is it just down to pool size?
The pool size determines the average expected time to a block.
100% on the blocks page is an average expected block.

You can work it out if you are interested Smiley
First check the current network difficulty ND - the bitcoind getinfo command will tell you that
... hmm I guess it wouldn't hurt to add that on the web site somewhere later if I can find space since it already knows it.
That number on the top left "Shares: NNN (X%)" is using the network diff to display the X%

Using the pool hash rate HR in THs, the expected time to a block is:
ND / (HR * 10^12 / 2^32)

So for example at 1400TH/s and the current (new today) ND of 40300030327.89140320

40300030327.89140320 / (1400 * 10^12 / 2^32) ~= 123634s ~= 34hrs 20min

You can also get that on my pool hash rate page I made years ago Smiley
http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php

Guess I could add that onto the pool web site at some time.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
hero member
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
i must be good luck for you as soon as i turned my first miner toward your pool a block was found... Cheesy

thanks...and welcome aboard  Grin
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
i must be good luck for you as soon as i turned my first miner toward your pool a block was found... Cheesy
Finally got a block ... but waiting on the confirm ...
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
i must be good luck for you as soon as i turned my first miner toward your pool a block was found... Cheesy
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 104
a certain operator of another small pool rented my hash for 24 hours, so I apologize for the loss of my 2.75 TH/s. I'm surprised anyone is willing to pay 0.0457875 BTC a day for 2.75 TH/s, but I won't complain about  it unless the pool finds a bunch of blocks in the last few hours of the rental period Wink .
sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 250
Is it just down to pool size?

Yep, keep calm and mine on ... review your monthly/weekly stats (don't do daily) ... averages work out. The pool is gradually picking up faster hash rate.

EDIT: Pool stats are coming back up nicely.

newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Thank you Kano for pointing that out. i could see my miners still working but didnt look to see where they were mining.

This is a total newbie question but ... what factors go into making a long 78 +hr block? Is it just down to pool size?
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
And its back.
Just a shame it still says 78 hrs.  Cry
Yeah there was also an unexpected ckpool restart in there at the end so many people will have failed over to backup Sad
All up and running again now though.
Jump to: