Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 921. (Read 5352420 times)

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
It's fun posting from a plane ... even more so when you get two block alerts Cheesy

Haha!  Multiple block alerts are always fun especially when we have a good start to block Friday! Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
And another from blockmines.  Block Friday IS ON!!  Cheesy Cheesy

Edit - That was a BACK-TO-BACK block!  Hell yeah!  Cool

And both of these with nice Fees!!

Go Block Friday!!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
It's fun posting from a plane ... even more so when you get two block alerts Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 538
I'm in BTC XTC
And another from blockmines.  Block Friday IS ON!!  Cheesy Cheesy

Edit - That was a BACK-TO-BACK block!  Hell yeah!  Cool
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
Block by cobramining! First Block Today! Let's Start Block Friday's!  Grin
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
Oh, i agree, it's just that i'm starting to lose my belief that Bitcoin will become something we can use on a daily basis.
  Lips sealed I will not go on an off-topic rant about how I agree because LN isn't Bitcoin.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Oh, i agree, it's just that i'm starting to lose my belief that Bitcoin will become something we can use on a daily basis.
legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2703
Evil beware: We have waffles!
...Speculation on my part, but I'd expect a 10nm chip in maybe 6 months - 1 year from bitmain...  
I'm not seeing where the market could/would drive that kind of research expense in that short of a time-frame.  Huh
Well, 10nm is old hat now ... with 7nm coming soon ...
Ja. Saw a PR release from GloFo today dated the 9th saying they are jumping directly to 7nm with major players (read: AMD, Cisco, and a few others) planing on engineering samples starting 1st half of 2018 and (my note: hoping for) limited productions by end of 2018.
https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/7nm-customer-socs-globalfoundries-h1-2018-2017-06/

Do note that pretty much all talk about chips using 12/10nm and under is directed at them being SoC - System on Chip devices and NOT single-function chips like ASICs or even more complex ones like being 'just' a CPU or GPU.

As for Bitmain and friends using it? Good bet it will be explored but as others have said, right now 16/14nm is doing fine and there is not yet a need/market to justify even attempting production runs for a long time.
sr. member
Activity: 393
Merit: 250
911 IT Admin. I keep 911 up so you get help ASAP!
Why so many orphaned blocks all of a sudden?
Read the previous 2 pages ...
'2' is so many?
The previous was last December.

2 in a month and the last one was December, yes I would consider that 'so many' all things considered since I have been mining that was why I asked. I then went back and read the previous pages so I got my answer.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
...Speculation on my part, but I'd expect a 10nm chip in maybe 6 months - 1 year from bitmain...  
I'm not seeing where the market could/would drive that kind of research expense in that short of a time-frame.  Huh
Well, 10nm is old hat now ... with 7nm coming soon ...
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
All I can say on the to the "I only profit x because...." people is:
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 14
Well the point is, i see these miners go on ebay.de around 550 to 650 euro's.   Lets say i would get 1100 euro's, at the current rate (sigh) that's is 0,5 BTC.
With the exponentially growing Diff  I've seen my profits go from 0,28 to 0,12 BTC/month in the last half year. So, what i'm wondering is that if I mine for half a year,
what would those miners still be worth? I'm guessing that in another 6 months I might scrape 0,5BTC with 2 S7's but by then the diff will have risen so much that monthly it's 0,05BTC for 9TH..
I can only use about 3000watt so more miners is not an option.
Furthermore, the whole BitMain HardFork, scaling debate and all is not healty for Bitcoin.
I got into Bitcoin from an ideological point of view, get rid of the banks... but now we miners like the high TX fee's.  
But the TX fee's can't stay this high, otherwise BTC is not usable for making payments anymore.

I agree that the pools are somehow like banks now.
[/quote]


Perhaps you should consider not how many bitcoin are being produced but their value in dollars. If the price of bitcoin continues to rise then continuing to mine profitably should not be an issue.

dzimmerm
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
...Speculation on my part, but I'd expect a 10nm chip in maybe 6 months - 1 year from bitmain...  
I'm not seeing where the market could/would drive that kind of research expense in that short of a time-frame.  Huh

I'm assuming it's already ongoing.  It would take about $150-200 million to develop which is still only ~0.5% of bitcoin's market cap.  A small price to pay to be able to absolutely dominate the mining market for the next 2-3+ years.  Smaller manufacturers can't afford it, but bitmain sure can. 
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
...Speculation on my part, but I'd expect a 10nm chip in maybe 6 months - 1 year from bitmain...  
I'm not seeing where the market could/would drive that kind of research expense in that short of a time-frame.  Huh
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Out of curiosity.

The S9 has been on the market for sometime now. I am wondering it is the limitation of hashing hardware/power or it is possible to got higher than 13.5TH but not releasing it for some reasons...

If you look at the control card of an S7 or an S9, there are unused connectors. In large farms, they probably couple 5x S9 on a single controller to reduce the cost. That make 70Ths per miner. But it's not sold at retail.

...

On the other hand to consume less energy than an S9, it will be necessary to pass on smaller chips (currently 16nm). TSMC announced technologies in 12 10 and even 7nm for the end of the year. 7nm should still double the computing power for the same power consumption.
... like a Canaan Avalon A741x20 on one controller - the RPi3 has 4 USB ports and you chain 5 A741s to each port - 150 - 160 THs
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Out of curiosity.

The S9 has been on the market for sometime now. I am wondering it is the limitation of hashing hardware/power or it is possible to got higher than 13.5TH but not releasing it for some reasons...

Not really.  It's a PSU issue.  It's not really practical to have single machines pulling more than 1500w.  

As for making a more efficient miner with the same power draw, I think it will be 6 months - 1 year off.  Bitmain uses 16nm chips for the S9's, and obviously they have designed a fantastic chip.  Another small manufacturer came out with a 14nm chip Ebang, but the efficiency is not as good as Bitmain's 16nm chip.  So either Bitmain has a very good chip design or Ebang has a very bad one, or both.  

So with other manufacturers, it doesn't look like 14nm chips will be able to beat S9's.  Keep in mind, Intel and AMD's latest generation of CPU's are 14nm.

Speculation on my part, but I'd expect a 10nm chip in maybe 6 months - 1 year from bitmain.  The max efficiency gain will be around 40%.  Which would be about 19th @ 1350w.  

I think 7nm is too far off.  
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
If you look at the control card of an S7 or an S9, there are unused connectors....
There's other components (resistors, etc.) "missing" as well.
full member
Activity: 230
Merit: 103
Out of curiosity.

The S9 has been on the market for sometime now. I am wondering it is the limitation of hashing hardware/power or it is possible to got higher than 13.5TH but not releasing it for some reasons...

If you look at the control card of an S7 or an S9, there are unused connectors. In large farms, they probably couple 5x S9 on a single controller to reduce the cost. That make 70Ths per miner. But it's not sold at retail.



On the other hand to consume less energy than an S9, it will be necessary to pass on smaller chips (currently 16nm). TSMC announced technologies in 12 10 and even 7nm for the end of the year. 7nm should still double the computing power for the same power consumption.
Jump to: