Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 926. (Read 5352429 times)

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
a simple block scale of 2x  long overdue  is all that should have been done with an agreement to revisit as scaling is needed.

Why not have block size scale like difficulty does?

Also what is the true block size maximum?
Yeah a fractional increase/decrease would be nice.

Current code/protocol allows 32MB
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
... a simple point to resolve that this thread seems to every other day become half a page of quotes of (the same) posts I keep deleting ...
I'll now start deleting replies to those posts also ...
They're pointless since it's page after page of the same thing over and over again.

Meanwhile Smiley
Iceland ... nice place, hideously expensive Tongue Everything is literally twice the price of just about anywhere else on the planet ...
legendary
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1099
Think for yourself
a simple block scale of 2x  long overdue  is all that should have been done with an agreement to revisit as scaling is needed.

Why not have block size scale like difficulty does?

Also what is the true block size maximum?
full member
Activity: 228
Merit: 100
Thanks Philipma for you post.

I only have a small amount of my power here -- and it has always concerned me that kano doesn't budge from his pure philosphical stance.  Personally, I'm a compromiser -- yet only want what is best for bitcoin's future -- even if that means losing a little in tx fee income.

It is nice to see a big mind (like yours) present a simple easy to understand argument.

Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
Im telling you how it is. It is not a threat. What do you think will be the outcome if miners persist on crippling bitcoin? Do you think there is going to be a happy ending?

miners  are making all of crypotcoin grow like a mofo.

And the creator coin BTC  is the driving force behind it.


coin total is now over 112 billion dollars.

http://coinmarketcap.com/

Market Cap: $112,413,614,212 / 24h Vol: $5,660,452,891 / BTC Dominance: 42.9%


with BTC value of 48 billion an all time high.

BTC  has less %  at 42.9%

But as a parent with many children knows  the offspring do out grow the parents.


Fuck segwit and the backwards people seeking to destroy  64  billion usd  in offspring coins  for the sake of 48 billion in starter coins read my signature and realize segwit need to be put to the ax.

a simple block scale of 2x  long overdue  is all that should have been done with an agreement to revisit as scaling is needed.

Segwit = death to BTC

miners are creating huge wealth here dude read the numbers  

http://coinmarketcap.com/
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
...A block size increase and SegWit are two different things.  SegWit DOES NOT increase the block size.  The block size increase is be held hostage and SegWit is the ransom demand...
It has been my experience that anyone you have to explain that to has already spent too much time reading misinformation on redit to have it explained to them and accept it.  Sad
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
legendary
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1099
Think for yourself
Do you actually believe that? The conservative blocksize increase which Core have been a major proponent of have been good to miners. How much are you making in fees these days? It is unfathomable to me how miners favor anything but conservative blocksize increases. I mean you have no idea whats good for you. And if you want war you will get it, just keep in mind you are the ones with the most to lose.

A block size increase and SegWit are two different things.  SegWit DOES NOT increase the block size.  The block size increase is be held hostage and SegWit is the ransom demand.

How old are you?
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Visualize whirledps
"Please don't chase the clouds, pagodas" or feed the trolls...  They are like seagulls. Feed them and they will continue to annoy you. Cool

COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!! Crack, already!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
I don't see you endlessly posting on Antpool's thread. How about you convince them first, then come back here.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
Do you actually believe that? The conservative blocksize increase which Core have been a major proponent of have been good to miners. How much are you making in fees these days? It is unfathomable to me how miners favor anything but conservative blocksize increases. I mean you have no idea whats good for you. And if you want war you will get it, just keep in mind you are the ones with the most to lose.
Don't threaten anyone. Period. Not here, not anywhere. It takes away whatever credibility you may have had.

Your diatribes show where your mind is, and this group doesn't like it...also period...and you're not going to change anything by persistence, except to be ignored a lot.

All this bovine scatology indicates only (1) you're being paid in some manner to push Segwit, and/or (2) your ideas of reference (look it up) came from a rail siding in Duluth, and/or (3) you simply have an intense and destructive dislike for the operator (?).

It appears you don't mine here...all you seem to be doing is getting off on pissing off other folks, and, of course...pushing Segwit.

I guess if you want to waste your paid-for electrons on this crap, well...it ain't my power bill.
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
It seems like the easy way is to just signal segwit. The hard way is to block it until the chain splits, and the users are driven to the segwit chain. And its not unlikely that the segwit chain will have different PoW so you cant even use your miners on it. You will be left in the dust.
Actually it seems the easy way would be for core not to ignore what the group who built bitcoin wants and stop trying to ram segwit down our throats. Segwit is not the way forward, except for it's developers. It's a long term solution for them to funnel all the bitcoin into their pockets as block rewards halve.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
There are 15 other pools that consistently find more blocks per given period of time than this pool. Go bug them with your infatuation of SEGWIT. In other words...PISS OFF MATE!
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
I had two coworkers that had a issue between them and one of them insisted they fixed it and become friends. The other one wanted nothing to do with him. So the first one went to the boss with the subject and the boss said "Stop being stupidly insisting your coworker does something she doesn't want to, just do your damn job or work somewhere else!!!".

Sounds like someone here is like my insistent coworker in trying to get the pool to do something. Good thing it's a free cyberspace and someone can choose whatever pool they want to mine with.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
Is there any reason we cant all be friends and get segwit activated?
Maybe, but you'd have to make the former not contingent upon the latter.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Hello everybody!

I'm new at mining and I tried to get some information at the irc. But I think it's faster here :-)

I'm mining with too gekkoscience 2pac and I'm generating only dust payments. When I was at the payout limit 0.0001 BTC nothing happened. I thought it was my payout address... but now I have two payout addresses at the payout site listed. If I collect all payments I'm with both addresses above 0.0001 BTC. Is it possible to get these rewards paid out?

I have for playing around some "bigger" used miners which I want to set to the pool.
1x Antminer S3+
2x Antminer S5
2x Gekkoscience 2pac with Raspberry Pi B+

Thank you very much.
Since it would have to be a manual payout and I'd have to check everything manually, it falls under the heading of dust payouts

Here's my resent posts on the subject:.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19327650
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19348023
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19368585
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Anyone wondering ... there's a planned outage at a particular data centre for around 12 hours that's made our hash rate drop by quite a lot.
Hopefully should be all back within 10.5 hours.
full member
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
Damn orphan...  Tongue

Yep, that sucked!  Cry
It wasn't an orphan, it was just a very close share.
Share diff was 678443271793.64551 but network diff is 678760110082.9902
So close yet so far - oh well Smiley

Damn diffuity  Undecided
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Hello everybody!

I'm new at mining and I tried to get some information at the irc. But I think it's faster here :-)

I'm mining with too gekkoscience 2pac and I'm generating only dust payments. When I was at the payout limit 0.0001 BTC nothing happened. I thought it was my payout address... but now I have two payout addresses at the payout site listed. If I collect all payments I'm with both addresses above 0.0001 BTC. Is it possible to get these rewards paid out?

I have for playing around some "bigger" used miners which I want to set to the pool.
1x Antminer S3+
2x Antminer S5
2x Gekkoscience 2pac with Raspberry Pi B+

Thank you very much.
Jump to: