Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 977. (Read 5352429 times)
May 07, 2017, 02:26:59 PM
May 07, 2017, 01:45:19 PM
Nothing has come easy so far this month. If my calculations of the block Diff% average are correct, we're hanging in there (of course only .90 behind expected. If I'm wrong and averaged out the Diff% wrong, someone please feel free to correct me. 
Math has never been a strong point for me. 
Let's turn the "Last 5 Blocks" stat LIME GREEN!!
(I apologize about the funky formatting. Too much work to fix it - Especially if the post is wrong! LOL
)
# Height Who Block Reward When UTC Status Diff Diff% CDF 100 Luck% B
1847 465298 xxx 14.3753712 2017‑05‑07 16:28:16 +7 Confirms 926,484,924,972 177.50% 0.831 121.92% 1
1846 465153 xxx 15.13377582 2017‑05‑06 19:47:36 Matured 1,011,403,447,613 193.77% 0.856 121.74% 2
1845 464988 xxx 14.9971453 2017‑05‑05 21:00:03 Matured 309,715,957,117 59.34% 0.448 124.61% 3
1844 464951 xxx 12.7204366 2017‑05‑05 13:57:17 Matured 884,669,465,667 169.49% 0.816 124.80% 4
1843 464831 xxx 13.88317703 2017‑05‑04 17:41:36 Matured 779,923,092,523 149.42% 0.776 126.77% 5
1842 464708 xxx 15.11823168 2017‑05‑03 23:54:09 Matured 479,656,351,147 91.89% 0.601 126.26% 6
1841 464640 xxx 14.14027513 2017‑05‑03 12:59:45 Matured 431,023,076,435 82.58% 0.562 122.55% 7
1840 464595 xxx 14.40528384 2017‑05‑03 03:15:07 Matured 488,309,729,477 93.55% 0.608 119.25% 8
1839 464522 xxx 14.20896796 2017‑05‑02 16:05:36 Matured 758,322,235,503 145.28% 0.766 119.84% 9
1838 464405 xxx 14.32912601 2017‑05‑01 22:30:06 Matured 86,667,482,452 16.60% 0.153 120.38% 10
1837 464389 xxx 14.37170125 2017‑05‑01 20:28:11 Matured 430,356,159,863 82.45% 0.562 120.16% 11
1836 464338 xxx 13.18565694 2017‑05‑01 10:23:22 Matured 97,319,091,677 18.64% 0.170 119.83% 12
1835 464319 xxx 12.84281969 2017‑05‑01 07:54:21 Matured 572,417,996,232 09.66% 0.666 120.00% 13
Pool Average of the Diff.% of the last 13 blocks (All of May) 106.94%
Need some QUICK GREEN BLOCKS to drop that average down!!!
(Or I may be completely ALL WRONG in trying to get an average Dif.%
MINE ON & COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!
Best Wishes, All !!
~
Math has never been a strong point for me. Let's turn the "Last 5 Blocks" stat LIME GREEN!!
(I apologize about the funky formatting. Too much work to fix it - Especially if the post is wrong! LOL
)Code:
# Height Who Block Reward When UTC Status Diff Diff% CDF 100 Luck% B
1847 465298 xxx 14.3753712 2017‑05‑07 16:28:16 +7 Confirms 926,484,924,972 177.50% 0.831 121.92% 1
1846 465153 xxx 15.13377582 2017‑05‑06 19:47:36 Matured 1,011,403,447,613 193.77% 0.856 121.74% 2
1845 464988 xxx 14.9971453 2017‑05‑05 21:00:03 Matured 309,715,957,117 59.34% 0.448 124.61% 3
1844 464951 xxx 12.7204366 2017‑05‑05 13:57:17 Matured 884,669,465,667 169.49% 0.816 124.80% 4
1843 464831 xxx 13.88317703 2017‑05‑04 17:41:36 Matured 779,923,092,523 149.42% 0.776 126.77% 5
1842 464708 xxx 15.11823168 2017‑05‑03 23:54:09 Matured 479,656,351,147 91.89% 0.601 126.26% 6
1841 464640 xxx 14.14027513 2017‑05‑03 12:59:45 Matured 431,023,076,435 82.58% 0.562 122.55% 7
1840 464595 xxx 14.40528384 2017‑05‑03 03:15:07 Matured 488,309,729,477 93.55% 0.608 119.25% 8
1839 464522 xxx 14.20896796 2017‑05‑02 16:05:36 Matured 758,322,235,503 145.28% 0.766 119.84% 9
1838 464405 xxx 14.32912601 2017‑05‑01 22:30:06 Matured 86,667,482,452 16.60% 0.153 120.38% 10
1837 464389 xxx 14.37170125 2017‑05‑01 20:28:11 Matured 430,356,159,863 82.45% 0.562 120.16% 11
1836 464338 xxx 13.18565694 2017‑05‑01 10:23:22 Matured 97,319,091,677 18.64% 0.170 119.83% 12
1835 464319 xxx 12.84281969 2017‑05‑01 07:54:21 Matured 572,417,996,232 09.66% 0.666 120.00% 13
Pool Average of the Diff.% of the last 13 blocks (All of May) 106.94%
Need some QUICK GREEN BLOCKS to drop that average down!!!
(Or I may be completely ALL WRONG in trying to get an average Dif.%
MINE ON & COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!
Best Wishes, All !!
~
May 07, 2017, 01:10:24 PM
Nice work!
May 07, 2017, 12:03:08 PM
The 2nd number shows up after you've been mining for an hour (for obvious reasons )
) May 07, 2017, 11:57:10 AM
In the top right corner, what does the first number in the two numbers for Hash Rate mean?
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
I believe the first number is your 5 minute hash rate and the second number is your 1 hour hash rate.
Exactly
To be totally correct, the first is your 5 minute hash-rate average and the second number your 1 hour hash-rate average.
May 07, 2017, 11:50:21 AM
In the top right corner, what does the first number in the two numbers for Hash Rate mean?
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
I believe the first number is your 5 minute hash rate and the second number is your 1 hour hash rate.
Exactly
May 07, 2017, 11:40:07 AM
In the top right corner, what does the first number in the two numbers for Hash Rate mean?
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
I believe the first number is your 5 minute hash rate and the second number is your 1 hour hash rate.
May 07, 2017, 11:38:54 AM
In the top right corner, what does the first number in the two numbers for Hash Rate mean?
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
For example 46.54 / 44.50
The first is always higher, usually a larger amount than I should have, and the right I assume is my accepted rate pool side.
May 07, 2017, 11:30:29 AM
I added an (automatic) 'tooltip' to all the graphs - hope you all find it useful
On touch screens/tablets/phones you tap on the graph and on a PC you just move the mouse over it.
It selects the closest point, of all graph lines, less than 100 pixels away.
On touch screens/tablets/phones you tap on the graph and on a PC you just move the mouse over it.
It selects the closest point, of all graph lines, less than 100 pixels away.
Thank you for these updates Kano! Also appreciate the total rewards at the top of the rewards page.
May 07, 2017, 11:29:01 AM
Block! by recline
S9v2
1.87BTC txn fees
S9v2
1.87BTC txn fees
May 07, 2017, 11:12:44 AM
To sum it up Segwits, is it is not about the miners at all. It is about turning bitcoin transactions and confirmations into Third Party Programs that have no business even talking about our currency. Yes, I say ours because every miner has dumped a significant amount of money to become part of a great peer to peer network. They pay for their miner, their power bill, their internet bill to support the greatest thing to happen to currency with minimal returns up front. I am constantly amazed when I read the ridiculous articles online and then you get the comments believing that if we adopted segwits the block size automatically increases. HUH?? Some people you just cannot explain it too no matter how much you try. Does our block size need to increase? Yes, but Segwits is not even an option for increasing block size, it is off chain mining, I repeat off chain mining or in an other term it is a way for greedy developers to profit from bitcoin off the back off the miners while preaching to the masses bitcoin is not about the miners. Plus opening a hole in the code that allows for developers who never owned a miner in their life to come in and start making money on our currency using our blockchain. There are so many things wrong with it.
Mr. Blockchainmines, that's is just about exactly how I see it. I don't have a fraction of the hash that you or many other people have, but I have still put in a lot of time, effort, sweat, money, and babying to keep my miners up and running and as happy as they can be running in a small spare bedroom.
Call me greedy, but I call it getting the best return that I can on my investments and the hard work I have put into it. I see no reason (or benefit) to help some clowns make large quantities of cash on my hard work. The "off-chain" transactions that these people support are ridiculous as they want to leave the miner out of most (all) of the benefits of their scheme. And yes, it is a scheme. It is only beneficial to the developers of LN and segwit. All of these half-assed proposals like BU and the like are just as worthless and dangerous.
Without us miners there would be no Bitcoin. But there can certainly be Bitcoin without LN or segwit. And that's the way it will continue. Until someone offers up a workable, fair, and secure method of scaling that benefits more people than it hurts, I'm content right where we are for the present time.
MINE ON!!! COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!
I have to add my 25 Satoshi's worth...you're both right on, in my humble low-hash opinion. I've worked in high-end banking (investigations), and I've been in IT since they were steel chassis and vacuum tubes (yes, I have actually put my hands on a real Turing machine).
All that said, my last (and longest) profession in behavioral science (and yes, I occasionally like to refer to some forms of it as BS) has me both giggling and shaking my head at some of the "logic" I see in the arguments. Most are based on plain and simple greed, peppered with a really clear NON-understanding of the blockchain, or even of basic currency dynamics. A big reason why I mine here is that us "little folks" can commiserate with a whale or two in pure equality, share our data and experience, and try to build a better blockchain for the planet...not just ourselves. This is way beyond who has the most fiat.
May 07, 2017, 10:14:11 AM
I added an (automatic) 'tooltip' to all the graphs - hope you all find it useful
On touch screens/tablets/phones you tap on the graph and on a PC you just move the mouse over it.
It selects the closest point, of all graph lines, less than 100 pixels away.
On touch screens/tablets/phones you tap on the graph and on a PC you just move the mouse over it.
It selects the closest point, of all graph lines, less than 100 pixels away.
May 06, 2017, 09:13:12 PM
more blockss plz
May 06, 2017, 04:56:42 PM
To sum it up Segwits, is it is not about the miners at all. It is about turning bitcoin transactions and confirmations into Third Party Programs that have no business even talking about our currency. Yes, I say ours because every miner has dumped a significant amount of money to become part of a great peer to peer network. They pay for their miner, their power bill, their internet bill to support the greatest thing to happen to currency with minimal returns up front. I am constantly amazed when I read the ridiculous articles online and then you get the comments believing that if we adopted segwits the block size automatically increases. HUH?? Some people you just cannot explain it too no matter how much you try. Does our block size need to increase? Yes, but Segwits is not even an option for increasing block size, it is off chain mining, I repeat off chain mining or in an other term it is a way for greedy developers to profit from bitcoin off the back off the miners while preaching to the masses bitcoin is not about the miners. Plus opening a hole in the code that allows for developers who never owned a miner in their life to come in and start making money on our currency using our blockchain. There are so many things wrong with it.
Mr. Blockchainmines, that's is just about exactly how I see it. I don't have a fraction of the hash that you or many other people have, but I have still put in a lot of time, effort, sweat, money, and babying to keep my miners up and running and as happy as they can be running in a small spare bedroom.
Call me greedy, but I call it getting the best return that I can on my investments and the hard work I have put into it. I see no reason (or benefit) to help some clowns make large quantities of cash on my hard work. The "off-chain" transactions that these people support are ridiculous as they want to leave the miner out of most (all) of the benefits of their scheme. And yes, it is a scheme. It is only beneficial to the developers of LN and segwit. All of these half-assed proposals like BU and the like are just as worthless and dangerous.
Without us miners there would be no Bitcoin. But there can certainly be Bitcoin without LN or segwit. And that's the way it will continue. Until someone offers up a workable, fair, and secure method of scaling that benefits more people than it hurts, I'm content right where we are for the present time.
MINE ON!!! COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!
May 06, 2017, 04:34:04 PM
My power here is $0.10. Per kw
Is that high or low.
Im thinking about getting a s9. If my dad would loan me more money.
Is that high or low.
Im thinking about getting a s9. If my dad would loan me more money.
May 06, 2017, 04:21:56 PM
Do you have some s7's? If so what th/s do you get.
I had them 2 years ago.
Some did freq 675 Some did freq 612
there were at least 5 different speeds in those batches.
My power is a bit high so I moved to avalon 721 and Bitmain s-9
May 06, 2017, 04:17:40 PM
Nice to see that mining is alive and well.
@Kano, have you considered signalling segwit in order to push it closer to activation? With SegWit activated your pool will be able to include more transactions per block which obviously translates to more fees for your miners. Right now the 1mb limit is forcing you to forfeit transactions to the next miner because you can only include 1mb per block you find atm.
@Kano, have you considered signalling segwit in order to push it closer to activation? With SegWit activated your pool will be able to include more transactions per block which obviously translates to more fees for your miners. Right now the 1mb limit is forcing you to forfeit transactions to the next miner because you can only include 1mb per block you find atm.
No offense but you really do not understand Segwits at all. In fact Segwits will do the exact opposite of what you just described. All segwits does is softfork the bitcoin blockchain to allow developers such as the lightnting network to create and entire offchain psuedo validation service so people can use bitcoin without actually having their transaction validated on chain. Yup you heard it right, your transaction would be in what is best described as an off chain time lock that the lightning network would then conduct as many transactions as possible (keeping all the fees to themselves) and at the end of the timelock they would get the entire blob of transactions validated on the blockchain as a single transaction with just the 1 fee going back to the miners.
Don't let the news or Segwits propaganda sites tell you how it works. Actually did in to the facts and read about it. It is a horrible solution and one that could fuck bitcoin up big time once you once you open that hole start to let developers into the blockchain. Bad idea.
I agree I see Segwit as death for BTC
In fact I see the rise of alt coin gpu mining as a reaction to segwit by big money miners.
Kano does not say much about segwit as this thread suffered a lot of spam a while back due to pro segwit people angry that kana spoke against it.
@ kano fell free to delete this I don"t want to heat segwit up.
@ Jigor finding your best freq will give you good stable hash you will know you got the right freq when your hard ware errors go to .0050 or less
To sum it up Segwits, is it is not about the miners at all. It is about turning bitcoin transactions and confirmations into Third Party Programs that have no business even talking about our currency. Yes, I say ours because every miner has dumped a significant amount of money to become part of a great peer to peer network. They pay for their miner, their power bill, their internet bill to support the greatest thing to happen to currency with minimal returns up front. I am constantly amazed when I read the ridiculous articles online and then you get the comments believing that if we adopted segwits the block size automatically increases. HUH?? Some people you just cannot explain it too no matter how much you try. Does our block size need to increase? Yes, but Segwits is not even an option for increasing block size, it is off chain mining, I repeat off chain mining or in an other term it is a way for greedy developers to profit from bitcoin off the back off the miners while preaching to the masses bitcoin is not about the miners. Plus opening a hole in the code that allows for developers who never owned a miner in their life to come in and start making money on our currency using our blockchain. There are so many things wrong with it.
May 06, 2017, 04:08:07 PM
Do you have some s7's? If so what th/s do you get.
May 06, 2017, 03:45:17 PM
Ok
yeah setup can take time but once you have it at a good freq they can run 30 or 60 days or more with nothing to do but look on the screen to check hash rate.
May 06, 2017, 03:43:28 PM
Ok
Jump to: