It does not appear to be switching.
Also, is there a formula for calculating the profitability numbers
I see scrypt is reference at 1. XXX below , is it a ratio of what my actual scrypt hash is to skein?
SET PASS=RIG02,c=BTC,skein=XXX,blake2s,nist5,c11,lyra2v2,stats
:start
ECHO multi-algo Switch....
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a skein -i 26 -o stratum+tcp://skein.mine.zpool.ca:4933 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -i 31 -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a nist5 -i 20 -o stratum+tcp://nist5.mine.zpool.ca:3833 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a c11 -i 21 -o stratum+tcp://c11.mine.zpool.ca:3573 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 21 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u %ADDY% -p %PASS%
GOTO start
Its fun seeing my code snippetts everywhere XD
your batch has no normalization in it whatsoever; you have to do it for all algos that you have in your batch, not just one as a reference; as crackfoo explained, poolside they are all treated as one; which is smart as there is a HUGE difference between nvidia and AMD miner hashrates.... it caused quite a bit of confusion for people in the past.
Check the link in my sig for the batch; there's a link to the original batch post as well in that post... In those should be a link to some normalization values I have run myself and lots of good info; Just pick a normalization that's close to the caliber of your card you are using. For instance if you have a 970, you could use my 960 or 980 numbers, not the 1070 numbers... etc. *edit* just looked, its directly in my sigs link, not 2 links deep.
once all of the algos have an "equals" value assigned to them, you will see the profit switching more where it should be.
Thinking about it now;
I should double check that I have at least some sort of normalization forced in my batch posted presently; which I think is true... gonna double check just to be sure =) I think I posted it before the change on poolside to 1 happened. I checked, its good. Notes at bottom of batch as to what normalization it has.
