Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 49. (Read 279601 times)

I need to check that out -- I did a small test and for the first time since I quit using it many months ago... NiceHash is ahead of ZPOOL on a test group of my workers.

Obviously I want to avoicd using NH and I've always done well with ZPOOL... but the difference is non-trivial. Perhaps it's just in my settings.

Thanks =)

Should be back to normal now.

That's what I was using for interval, along with 5% for the threshold to switch, but I just downloaded and am running the benchmarks for the MrPlus version that blends together short and long term profitability to reduce chasing brief profitability spikes and have set interval to 120 seconds and threshold to 4%. See the ANN thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nplusminer-multirig-remote-managementaiautoupdatepoolalgo-switching-2965976

I can't say whether it is better or not since it is still benchmarking, but it makes more sense to me than merely polling the API every x seconds and then switching even if that algo is getting pumped by some low-float shitcoin.

What interval is everyone here using with ZPOOL & NEMOSMINER -- my mining profit seems unusually low recently -- using a 300-second interval at the moment.

right

If i don't use BTC as payout coin, i don't have to pay the exchange fee, only the pool fee, right?

Hey crackfoo are you having pool issues today too?

trying to check pool I keep getting cloudfare error or it just loads a blank pool gui with no data in it.....
I want to mine xsh and zpool seems the only one with any hash but its so erratic right now. just me or no?

Deleted a few posts for obvious reasons. ice you know you’re not welcome here. There is a troll thread for zpool which I’m sure you would we welcomed with open arms. And this is not an invitation to reply.

so because your initial impression of "him not being rude outright", without a full scope of the entire interactions we have had with him;  invalidates the facts and truths I have set right in front of you.  I like it how you still quoted the truth, that you are so quick to dismiss because you might be wrong in your broken opinion that is based on lack of information.

This is the type of logic you practice??   Mr.... "White Knight"?   Apparently acting in such a way helps you get some sort of feeling.

...

He was being rude though;  read this thread completely because its obvious you missed out on a little historical information and are only seeing what you haven't taken the time to fully read.   See how many times this subject has brought it up, and in turn how many times it was answered.  I'm sorry, but its pretty clear once you see it.  There are even replies from months ago, of me, re-explaining that it has been taken under advisement, and that there was a whole separate thread for that subject anyways.... yet here we are again.


That is exactly why its being trolling. [by literal definition]  Look up the definition;  He's doing it.

Some pages ago he noted he thinks he found the problem code (as was discussed in the other thread specifically about the subject) and he requested a commit on github for it to be fixed.  He was answered then very clearly; something to the tune of:  if it gets updated in the main code that's distributed to everyone, it will get applied when the pool code is updated.

This mythical "20%" bug;  is the reason the first thread was closed to begin with; feel free to get acquainted if you didn't already.  Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260863.3240

But I do distinctly recall his and others' posts being answered, more than once.

I have no clue what goes through crackfoo's head, but I can only imagine putting myself in his shoes...   the metric ton of crap that you gotta put up with...  I myself being the kind of person that really dislikes repeating myself; so I can sort of understand the frustration in seeing it happen.

I am not affiliated or tied to zpool in any way except for the fact that I use it;  I just write batch files and scripts for public use because it is easier than walking people through the same steps over and over again; because of how differently yiimp can be used.

It's people like you that are unwilling to discuss without denigration and callous; that give me the drive to do what I do; aside from the fact that I get paid by a sponsor to post here.. which is really just a bonus in the end.  FYI;  keep trolling if crackfoo doesn't delete your useless rants.  Each reply I make just adds to my trading account.

I've only notice him be rude to the people whom are being rude outright....

especially when people are asking for an answer that has been repeated more than once over the past few pages, no less last page of this thread typically;  or even worse;  given an answer and they continue to ask over and over and over again like a little two year old as if they were never answered in the first place.....

I would like the ones in question to explain how an exchange is not done otherwise with zero fees.....  get my drift?  I.E.  if you were to mine at a pool and take the coin you earned, send it to an exchange, sell it, then transfer back... see how much it costs....   especially when you operate on the principal of to sell the coins for what they will sell for, and not wait for your optimum price you wish (not what the pool does).    You are looking at a certain 5-10% in fees just due to some exchange tx fee requirements if its a smaller coin amount.

Crackfoo charges the pool percentage upfront, and has been (as far as I can tell) truthful about all of this.

If you don't like the fact that the automated exchange costs are not to your liking.... please, go somewhere else.  it makes everyone happy in the end.

You are also free to review the yiimp code to see how it works, and correlate those actions to the different exchanges and their operations/fees.  The other posts suggest he is pocketing the "exchange fee" which, is so far:  unfounded....  Secondly, nobody has proved that the magical "20%" bug effects anything other than the API display.... in fact, The most important question on that subject:  if it was actually such a big problem, why hasn't it been commited and updated into the yiimp code??  Hmmmm......

@buek
http://zpool.ca/stats for neoscrypt look pretty normal to me....

read back a page or two and there was info on the neoscrypt port having some issues.

admin, what happened to the yield on the neoscript? why so much profit fell?

Hello, I have just gotten started in mining over the last couple of weeks.  My question what is minimum time i should stay on a lyra vs. equihash vs neoscrypt without screwing myself.    I was told by a friend of mine 4-6 hours.  Is that accurate?

Well, interesting... Looks like I am experiencing the same thing as @madmack1. One of my miners switched over to lyra2v2 and it promptly dropped off the list of miners on my BTC address page, and has been off for several minutes now despite that ccminer is happily hashing away.

Wait... just switched from lyra2v2 to hsr... and that miner showed up in the list again.

There are some lyra2v2 coins waiting to be exchanged/mature, but the most recent was from 82 minutes ago so definitely something screwy going on here.

UPDATE - NemosMiner switched back to lyra2v2 and this time the miner shows up in the list. Watching to see if any lyra2v2 coins are added to the exchange queue.

UPDATE 2 - Some monacoin & mobilecash added to the queue, so looks like an intermittent issue.

I been mining there for a few days solid and stable. But somethings happened last night. iv switched to different coin and pool for now.
Lyra2v2 blocks still being found.
Just not being paid anymore......Not stealing my hash!

My balance has been steadily increasing, but I've been using NemosMiner which switches between algos and your fragment of a screenshot suggests you've been on Lyra2v2 the entire time so any issue is likely with one of those coins. I've had good results single-algo mining lyra2v2 here before, but yesterday I noticed a similar problem as you when I tried mining Equihash for about 4 hours - no earned coins in that time so went back to NemosMiner (just trying to get my balance up then I am done with NemosMiner and the other algo-switching programs).

I disabled zpool.ca from all my 1273 RIGs to avoid future loses and I advise you all disable zpool until they will fix the issues and until they will monitor the pool and avoid high loses we all have.


They will not be used anymore and will go to 1k miners soon (like it happened with HashRefinery, now they are out of the market, nobody uses them anymore) , if they continue to cause us so many loses.

Zpool also charges 2% pool fee + 5% exchange fee = 7% total fee from zpool, and that is a lot more compared to many pools that have 0.5% fee. I advise you to search and use lower fee pools for higher profit.

Whats going on with zpool today/last night

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=vgmt8p&s=9

constant hashrate no payout for half a day and nothing being earned right now

Neoscrypt statistics are 100 times higher and are all reporting received hashes, but income is 0.

http://www.zpool.ca/stats

I disabled zpool.ca from all my 1273 RIGs to avoid future loses and I advise you all disable zpool until they will fix the issues and until they will monitor the pool and avoid high loses we all have.

 

Big Thanks!!!

no;  since you are a ratio;  its only the downtime that will effect you... you should be ok.

I do suggest letting it run for the maximum amount of time;  record what the difficulty gets to each time;  average those numbers, and use that as a manual difficulty in your password string.  This way difficulty doesn't need time to adjust every time and keeps you optimal.   Just average ~5 different restarts.
Example password:
c=BTC,nist5,d=4