Pages:
Author

Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 47. (Read 279601 times)

full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 184
Stratum issues.

[2018-02-19 19:37:54] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to timetravel.mine.zpool.ca port 3555: Timed out
[2018-02-19 19:37:54] ...retry after 30 seconds
That's good - you don't want to mine that crap coin anyways.

Well, technically, it's an algorithm.. not a coin.    But at the moment it's showing up as the most profitable with zpool. (for probably 5m)

You are both correct: timetravel is the name of the algorithm, but the only coin on Zpool that uses it is Machinecoin.

While Machinecoin looks like just another shitcoin, and wouldn't be worth holding on to, I have no qualms about mining it for auto-conversion to something with brighter prospects.

EDIT - in fact, 2 of my rigs are mining it now, converting to XVG on one and VTC on another.

EDIT 2 - and that proved to be a costly mistake, as even though timetravel was the most profitable algo for much of the last several hours according to NemosMiner, I received not a single Machinecoin... So, removed that algo from the list as something is clearly broken here. it looks like the time to find is quite long - 92 minutes - so might not get credit for my hashrate for awhile yet.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Stratum issues.

[2018-02-19 19:37:54] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to timetravel.mine.zpool.ca port 3555: Timed out
[2018-02-19 19:37:54] ...retry after 30 seconds
That's good - you don't want to mine that crap coin anyways.

Well, technically, it's an algorithm.. not a coin.    But at the moment it's showing up as the most profitable with zpool. (for probably 5m)
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
please can any one give me a command for dual mining ETH on nanopool and XVG on zpool
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
Stratum issues.

[2018-02-19 19:37:54] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to timetravel.mine.zpool.ca port 3555: Timed out
[2018-02-19 19:37:54] ...retry after 30 seconds
That's good - you don't want to mine that crap coin anyways.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Stratum issues.

[2018-02-19 19:37:54] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to timetravel.mine.zpool.ca port 3555: Timed out
[2018-02-19 19:37:54] ...retry after 30 seconds
full member
Activity: 270
Merit: 115
Tried to find a definitive answer though 200+ pages but couldn't.
Is it possible to mine a particular coin (e.g. DGB)? (I mean to mine DGB and get BTC, not to get payouts in DGB)

You can not mine this coin on it's own (DGB) in the algo that it lives in as there are two other coins there as well, all three coins will be mined and then exchanged for the coin you want to be paid out in.


jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 2
Tried to find a definitive answer though 200+ pages but couldn't.
Is it possible to mine a particular coin (e.g. DGB)? (I mean to mine DGB and get BTC, not to get payouts in DGB)

Yes.  You can mine anything and get paid in BTC.  BTC is actually the only payout that's 100% guaranteed. In the miner you need to set your username to your BTC address and the pw to c=BTC
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Tried to find a definitive answer though 200+ pages but couldn't.
Is it possible to mine a particular coin (e.g. DGB)? (I mean to mine DGB and get BTC, not to get payouts in DGB)
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 2
So NemosMiner just stopped and the last entry in miner.log file says this:

Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/19/2018 10:13:34
Sleep 120 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running:

     Speed Started  Active   Cnt Command
     ----- -------  ------   --- -------
13.96 MH/s 00:00:03 00:00:21 2   Bin\NVIDIA-ccminerpolytimos\ccminer.exe -a x17 -o
                                 stratum+tcp://x17.mine.zpool.ca:3737 -u
                                 1NSMAbm12rLDmbcVVVwj2TubejihokaTRf -p ID=eleusis1,c=BTC -i 20  -d
                                 0


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/19/2018 10:15:35
Sleep 120 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stats ' X17 ' ->  12.97 MH after 306 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS>TerminatingError(Invoke-WebRequest): "Account suspended"

Is this from NemosMiner, PowerShell or Zpool?

You might want to jump on discord and ask about this.  You wouldn't be suspended from Nemos or Powershell.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 184
So NemosMiner just stopped and the last entry in miner.log file says this:

Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/19/2018 10:13:34
Sleep 120 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running:

     Speed Started  Active   Cnt Command
     ----- -------  ------   --- -------
13.96 MH/s 00:00:03 00:00:21 2   Bin\NVIDIA-ccminerpolytimos\ccminer.exe -a x17 -o
                                 stratum+tcp://x17.mine.zpool.ca:3737 -u
                                 1NSMAbm12rLDmbcVVVwj2TubejihokaTRf -p ID=eleusis1,c=BTC -i 20  -d
                                 0


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/19/2018 10:15:35
Sleep 120 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stats ' X17 ' ->  12.97 MH after 306 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS>TerminatingError(Invoke-WebRequest): "Account suspended"

Is this from NemosMiner, PowerShell or Zpool?

UPDATE - this error is from NemosMiner and it's the result of the donation function not working correctly. So, not a Zpool problem. Carry on!
hero member
Activity: 698
Merit: 500
There is another factor that I think I have picked up that contributes to the loss of income with algo switching on zpool and it relates to the delay between when a new hash is solved and when it becomes "immature". If there are several "new" hashes and the miner switches way to a new algo you lose some of the income from those shares when they switch to immature. This issue is easily observable. simply mine a coin like x17 and when you see 4 or 5 new shares sitting in the pool stop your miner and see how many of those hashes you get paid for.

biggest factor is when sh** exchange reports sh** price for a sh**coin
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hello guys, who will tell you what is happening with the neoscript and profitability on it? At a power of 29 mh per day, 0.005 btc is obtained. A very large drop in profit. Is it my one or the pool that stopped being interesting on this algorithm? Smiley
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
There is another factor that I think I have picked up that contributes to the loss of income with algo switching on zpool and it relates to the delay between when a new hash is solved and when it becomes "immature". If there are several "new" hashes and the miner switches way to a new algo you lose some of the income from those shares when they switch to immature. This issue is easily observable. simply mine a coin like x17 and when you see 4 or 5 new shares sitting in the pool stop your miner and see how many of those hashes you get paid for.

A more interesting test would be to sit idle until a "new" block shows up in X17, *THEN* start your miner and see if you can "skim" a few % off the block.

I have done that test and yes you can Sad

However its generally still a lose/lose situation as it seems to take a while for your share percentage to build up so your share of those new shares is very low . So you lose a lot when you switch away and only gain a little when you  switch to.
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
There is another factor that I think I have picked up that contributes to the loss of income with algo switching on zpool and it relates to the delay between when a new hash is solved and when it becomes "immature". If there are several "new" hashes and the miner switches way to a new algo you lose some of the income from those shares when they switch to immature. This issue is easily observable. simply mine a coin like x17 and when you see 4 or 5 new shares sitting in the pool stop your miner and see how many of those hashes you get paid for.

A more interesting test would be to sit idle until a "new" block shows up in X17, *THEN* start your miner and see if you can "skim" a few % off the block.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 184
it's not abandoned, last update is ten days ago, hardest part is to configure it as it lacks active support.

Yeah, at some point it would have been less hassle for me to learn how to write my own script in powershell... and I'm pretty sure that point has already passed.  Roll Eyes

newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
...

I'm *hoping* that MrPlus' fork of NemosMiner will help, but if not I will use NiceHash for auto-convert to BTC and Zpool or MiningPoolHub for "single-algo, convert to whatever I want."

try MinerControl* to use all mentioned pools, it has config to use current pool api data or use an average window(60 minutes by default), use master-slave config if run multiple rigs, avoid looking @ zpool webpage stats cause it would block pulling api, use https://miningpoolhubstats.com/ instead.

* - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lT8E8j3BKzM7r1Mo2EFHk1NmP8gkdZ1Q and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769239.1180

Using a 60 minute average of profitability would be better than relying on either the instantaneous value when polled or the strange attempt to average the 24 hour and instantaneous data that NemosMiner and others are pursuing. However, MinerControl appears to have been abandoned several years ago while MrPlus has been working on a fork of NemosMiner* right now and so seems to be receptive to implementing good ideas provided by the community so I am giving it a shot now.


* - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nplusminer-multirig-remote-managementaiautoupdatepoolalgo-switching-2965976

There is another factor that I think I have picked up that contributes to the loss of income with algo switching on zpool and it relates to the delay between when a new hash is solved and when it becomes "immature". If there are several "new" hashes and the miner switches way to a new algo you lose some of the income from those shares when they switch to immature. This issue is easily observable. simply mine a coin like x17 and when you see 4 or 5 new shares sitting in the pool stop your miner and see how many of those hashes you get paid for.
hero member
Activity: 698
Merit: 500
it's not abandoned, last update is ten days ago, hardest part is to configure it as it lacks active support.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 184
...

I'm *hoping* that MrPlus' fork of NemosMiner will help, but if not I will use NiceHash for auto-convert to BTC and Zpool or MiningPoolHub for "single-algo, convert to whatever I want."

try MinerControl* to use all mentioned pools, it has config to use current pool api data or use an average window(60 minutes by default), use master-slave config if run multiple rigs, avoid looking @ zpool webpage stats cause it would block pulling api, use https://miningpoolhubstats.com/ instead.

* - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lT8E8j3BKzM7r1Mo2EFHk1NmP8gkdZ1Q and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769239.1180

Using a 60 minute average of profitability would be better than relying on either the instantaneous value when polled or the strange attempt to average the 24 hour and instantaneous data that NemosMiner and others are pursuing. However, MinerControl appears to have been abandoned several years ago while MrPlus has been working on a fork of NemosMiner* right now and so seems to be receptive to implementing good ideas provided by the community so I am giving it a shot now.


* - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nplusminer-multirig-remote-managementaiautoupdatepoolalgo-switching-2965976
hero member
Activity: 698
Merit: 500
That said, NONE of the multi-algo pools I've tested over the last few weeks - using NemosMiner, in all cases - beat out NiceHash when run concurrently on similar hardware. Two pools got on the wrong side of a hard fork which wiped out ~35% of my earnings so those were clearly outliers, but MiningPoolHub and Zpool both came in around 10% less than NH and so I have begun to suspect NemosMiner is the culprit, especially since I verified that both pools pay fairly/honestly when run in single-algo mode (Neoscrypt on MPH and Lyra2v2 on Zpool).

I'm *hoping* that MrPlus' fork of NemosMiner will help, but if not I will use NiceHash for auto-convert to BTC and Zpool or MiningPoolHub for "single-algo, convert to whatever I want."

try MinerControl* to use all mentioned pools, it has config to use current pool api data or use an average window(60 minutes by default), use master-slave config if run multiple rigs, avoid looking @ zpool webpage stats cause it would block pulling api, use https://miningpoolhubstats.com/ instead.

* - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lT8E8j3BKzM7r1Mo2EFHk1NmP8gkdZ1Q and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769239.1180
Pages:
Jump to: