Kind attention- LAUDA & THE PHARMACIST

Panthers52

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 502

#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on February 02, 2018, 11:55:52 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2018, 09:04:23 PM

Quote from: MadZ on January 21, 2018, 08:27:49 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 20, 2018, 12:22:04 AM

Lauda is almost certainly the same as ThePharmacist...

Is there proof of this?

I would like to see Lauda and The Pharmacist (presumably) deny the connection before I comment on this.

I hereby categorically deny that I am Lauda.

Boy, that would be a serious Fight Club/Tyler Durden situation if I was.

If any of you schmucks can present a good argument that I'm an alt of Lauda, I'd love to see it. I will grab the popcorn and sit back in my Lazy-Boy and watch. Be my guest, QS/Thule/Panthers55/etc.

Who is this Panthers55 you speak of? I can’t speak for QS, however I can certify that I am in no way related to “Panthers55”.

There are little hints scattered around that implies you are Lauda.

Kind regards
Panthers52

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 7011

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2018, 09:04:23 PM

Quote from: MadZ on January 21, 2018, 08:27:49 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 20, 2018, 12:22:04 AM

Lauda is almost certainly the same as ThePharmacist...

Is there proof of this?

I would like to see Lauda and The Pharmacist (presumably) deny the connection before I comment on this.

I hereby categorically deny that I am Lauda.

Boy, that would be a serious Fight Club/Tyler Durden situation if I was.

If any of you schmucks can present a good argument that I'm an alt of Lauda, I'd love to see it. I will grab the popcorn and sit back in my Lazy-Boy and watch. Be my guest, QS/Thule/Panthers5552/etc.

Edi: You know goddamn well what I meant, you southern turd-hick! LOL

As far as the racism goes, I find it amusing that people get offended and then suddenly want everything censored. You know as well as I do that some of the worst shitposters are from the Philippines and Indonesia--and all over Asia. I don't dislike people because of their race, but there are certain countries that are responsible for all the BS posting here, and I'm going to call it like I see it.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: kandholabhavna on February 01, 2018, 10:29:06 AM

I have noticed that Pharmacist has been vocally racist for some races(especially filipinos) which encourages others to be racist and creates a bad environment in the forum.

I would advise finding specific examples of this and contact blazed about this, publicity if necessary. Blazed is the reason why ThePharnacist is in the default trust network.

kandholabhavna

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2018, 09:04:23 PM

Quote from: MadZ on January 21, 2018, 08:27:49 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 20, 2018, 12:22:04 AM

Lauda is almost certainly the same as ThePharmacist...

Is there proof of this?

I would like to see Lauda and The Pharmacist (presumably) deny the connection before I comment on this.

Luada was quick to jump to tagging me when Pharmacist did. Noted the same in many other cases where users were not breaking rules and Pharmacists negative trusts were followed by Lauda giving the users the same also. I also suspect that it is either the same handler for both the accounts or they are teaming up to gag others. These guys have grown power hungry.
I have noticed that Pharmacist has been vocally racist for some races(especially filipinos) which encourages others to be racist and creates a bad environment in the forum. Its its funny how they tell others to get a job when the fact is that they are almost online here most of the day and I seriously doubt that if they themselves have a real job.
Also Lauda was suspected to be doing some fraud and hence removed from being a staff member, why still have him around at a position where he can inflict damage to legit accounts?

KWH

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1045

In Collateral I Trust.

Quote from: Lieldoryn on January 27, 2018, 04:57:50 AM

The Pharmacist really abusing the negative trust.The trust rating should only be used for members that are suspected in fraud. My opinion is that such actions should be forbidden. We see an attempt of seizure of power on the forum.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858

Quote

- It's OK to post a rating about the person in general, not tied to a specific trade.

Lieldoryn

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 272

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2018, 09:04:23 PM

Quote from: MadZ on January 21, 2018, 08:27:49 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 20, 2018, 12:22:04 AM

Lauda is almost certainly the same as ThePharmacist...

Is there proof of this?

I would like to see Lauda and The Pharmacist (presumably) deny the connection before I comment on this.

The Pharmacist really abusing the negative trust.The trust rating should only be used for members that are suspected in fraud. My opinion is that such actions should be forbidden. We see an attempt of seizure of power on the forum.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: MadZ on January 21, 2018, 08:27:49 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 20, 2018, 12:22:04 AM

Lauda is almost certainly the same as ThePharmacist...

Is there proof of this?

I would like to see Lauda and The Pharmacist (presumably) deny the connection before I comment on this.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Silber on January 21, 2018, 05:45:41 PM

If you received an negative feedback from him, you should also give him an negative feedback in return.[/b]

I think the Pharmacist should be banned for leafing so many negative feedbacks!

Do you realize how stupid you sound?

You tell everyone else to do the same thing he is doing, then you ask for him to be banned....

MadZ

hero member

Activity: 908

Merit: 657

Quote from: Quickseller on January 20, 2018, 12:22:04 AM

Lauda is almost certainly the same as ThePharmacist...

Is there proof of this?

Quote from: Silber on January 21, 2018, 05:45:41 PM

I received a negative feedback from the Pharmacist:

"This user writes generic, 3rd world shitposts. This pollutes bitcointalk to his benefit exclusively. Should NEVER be paid to post."

But that is not true, just look up my post!

The most of my post are in the German sub forum, and I doubt that he can read German.

I have never been participated on any bounty or signature campaign!

I gave him a negativ feedback too, because I looked up the other Feedback that he left, and it turned out that he's giving al lot of other people a negativ feedback - that's an abuse of the feedback system for his own benefits.

If you received an negative feedback from him, you should also give him an negative feedback in return.

I think the Pharmacist should be banned for leafing so many negative feedbacks!

He won't be banned, the trust system is un-moderated.The only recourse for leaving poor feedback is being excluded from other people's trust lists. Personally, I think it's a bit far to give a negative rating to someone who isn't even enrolled or trying to enroll in a signature campaign. A neutral rating seems far more appropriate, at least in your case.

Silber

full member

Activity: 1154

Merit: 154

I received a negative feedback from the Pharmacist:

"This user writes generic, 3rd world shitposts. This pollutes bitcointalk to his benefit exclusively. Should NEVER be paid to post."

But that is not true, just look up my post!

The most of my post are in the German sub forum, and I doubt that he can read German.

I have never been participated on any bounty or signature campaign!

I gave him a negativ feedback too, because I looked up the other Feedback that he left, and it turned out that he's giving al lot of other people a negativ feedback - that's an abuse of the feedback system for his own benefits.

If you received an negative feedback from him, you should also give him an negative feedback in return.

I think the Pharmacist should be banned for leafing so many negative feedbacks!

kandholabhavna

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 20, 2018, 04:53:45 PM

Quote from: TheUltraElite on January 20, 2018, 04:35:33 AM

Stop that BS asslicking will ya?

I agree with this, and it drives me nuts. I have about 100 PMs with "sir, plz..." and then some bullcrap begging about a trust rating I left last year. The worst one is this:

Quote from: kabelpeggek on January 20, 2018, 04:48:30 PM

Hey what are you doing?
I work for my son and wife, why do you disturb my work sir ..
please delete it
I am very difficult to find a job because I only graduate elementary school

Followed by:

Quote from: kabelpeggek on January 20, 2018, 06:58:40 PM

You pretend you did not hear it now
may Allah punish you for what you have done to me
innallaha maasobirin

And frankly, I don't care about people polluting bitcointalk to support the fucking family that they obviously can't support and shouldn't have had. That sounds like your problem, not my problem. By the way, what were you doing before 10/2017 when the account was created? How were you feeding your family then? The point is, I don't believe any of these sob stories. People like this one are ruining the forum that they're using to earn money--and it's a "job" which they're not qualified to do.

And then this:

Quote from: Grab on January 20, 2018, 08:02:41 PM

You act like fucking cunt with mentaly issues.

This one made me smile.

Let this be a notice to people I've tagged: Don't beg me, don't try to buy a feedback removal, and save the stories for another sucker. I'm not buying any of it.

Just to make it clear to others, none of those quotes are taken from the PM that I had sent to Pharmacist. I have a good enough job and am actually quiet well of tbh. Crypto and engaging with like minded people here is just something that I do out of my own choice rather than some necessity. The PM I sent you was just putting in my case explaining to you why I think that marking my account negative was too harsh and hoped that maybe after I have put in my view point, you would reconsider my case. Nowhere have I begged, insulted or abused you, Lauda or any of the other people.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 20, 2018, 04:53:45 PM

And frankly, I don't care about people polluting bitcointalk to support the fucking family that they obviously can't support and shouldn't have had. That sounds like your problem, not my problem.

That bugs me too about all the PMs I receive. They don't care they broke the rules, they don't care they disrupt the forum, they just want to join a signature campaign.

It's like going to a job interview and answering every question with "I need the money."

kandholabhavna

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: actmyname on January 20, 2018, 04:50:42 PM

Quote from: kandholabhavna on January 20, 2018, 11:58:02 AM

Remember I asked IF IT WAS LEGIT OR NOT.

No, no no. Wait. Look at the following statements and tell me if you would trust anyone who would write these phrases:

"Is having sex with a minor legal? I want to have sex with a minor."
"Is kill someone legal? I want to kill someone."
"Is committing tax fraud legal? I want to just not pay taxes."
"Is taking a chocolate bar from the convenience store down the street legal? I want to steal a chocolate bar."

The first part is irrelevant. We're focused on the latter portion of the quotes, where willful intent is shown. ☐

The examples that you have given in here are not fit to this situation. A more relevant example would be:
If someone relocates from Germany to UK and asks the driving instructor that if there are any speed limits on the freeway or not. Because more than half of the total length of the German autobahn network has no speed limit. It feels obvious that there should be a speed limit, but when you see people doing over speeding you ask this out of natural curiously.
Once I was told that buying is something that is not encouraged, I did not further pursue the matter. It was just a innocent query. Nothing more else than that and my case has definitely been blown out of proportion.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 7011

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: TheUltraElite on January 20, 2018, 04:35:33 AM

Stop that BS asslicking will ya?

I agree with this, and it drives me nuts. I have about 100 PMs with "sir, plz..." and then some bullcrap begging about a trust rating I left last year. The worst one is this:

Quote from: kabelpeggek on January 20, 2018, 04:48:30 PM

Hey what are you doing?
I work for my son and wife, why do you disturb my work sir ..
please delete it
I am very difficult to find a job because I only graduate elementary school

Followed by:

Quote from: kabelpeggek on January 20, 2018, 06:58:40 PM

You pretend you did not hear it now
may Allah punish you for what you have done to me
innallaha maasobirin

And frankly, I don't care about people polluting bitcointalk to support the fucking family that they obviously can't support and shouldn't have had. That sounds like your problem, not my problem. By the way, what were you doing before 10/2017 when the account was created? How were you feeding your family then? The point is, I don't believe any of these sob stories. People like this one are ruining the forum that they're using to earn money--and it's a "job" which they're not qualified to do.

And then this:

Quote from: Grab on January 20, 2018, 08:02:41 PM

You act like fucking cunt with mentaly issues.

This one made me smile.

Let this be a notice to people I've tagged: Don't beg me, don't try to buy a feedback removal, and save the stories for another sucker. I'm not buying any of it.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: kandholabhavna on January 20, 2018, 11:58:02 AM

Remember I asked IF IT WAS LEGIT OR NOT.

No, no no. Wait. Look at the following statements and tell me if you would trust anyone who would write these phrases:

"Is having sex with a minor legal? I want to have sex with a minor."
"Is kill someone legal? I want to kill someone."
"Is committing tax fraud legal? I want to just not pay taxes."
"Is taking a chocolate bar from the convenience store down the street legal? I want to steal a chocolate bar."

The first part is irrelevant. We're focused on the latter portion of the quotes, where willful intent is shown. ☐

kandholabhavna

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheUltraElite on January 20, 2018, 04:35:33 AM

Quote from: kandholabhavna on January 20, 2018, 02:43:24 AM

Pharmacist, it is most commendable that members like you, Lauda and others are putting your time and effort to make this space secure and clean for others to use, else this would turn into a mad house for sure.

Stop that BS asslicking will ya? Its pretty naive and it gives you away - honestly. I never saw you kissing The Pharmacist's ass before this negative trust shitstorm appeared - prove me wrong?

Quote

You have mentioned that you will not revoke the negative trust as it does not makes sense because in that case there was no point in leaving it at the first place. However, in my humble opinion should this not vary from case to case? I don't know what kind of scams people are running over here that you guys are so bent on not changing your once made decision even after reviewing that what I asked was done in all innocence when I was NEW here and even to blockchain/crypto as overall. If you read another post made nearly about same time it is about asking people how and where to learn TA from. Do you think a scammer would not know about such a thing and ask such a dumb question? I sincerely hope that my overall behavior should be taken into consideration and I should not be given neg trust just because of 1 post that I made when I was new, also please note that I did not indulge in any such talks with any other members here after that particular post that got me negative rating. Looking forward to your and Lauda's kind consideration into the matter.

In cases where the person can prove beyond doubt that they are innocent - trust ratings MAYBE changed - depends on the discretion of the person giving you the trust rating - nobody can help that other than asking them politely about it.

For your case though like I have previously said account are sold to shady purposes and have nothing good to offer and I am sure you also had some shady purpose (wanted to abuse sig campaign? say no I dont care).

Bottom Line : we know you will be back with an alt account and start pooping in the forum like this again - characteristic of the shitposters. Get a life and a Job to earn and leave this forum.

I am not sure what makes you think that I do not have a real life job? As far as your ass kissing comment, it just tells about your own mentality, I was raised to be polite and respectful to others and even if the negative trust is not revoked I will remain the same to everyone else, here or in person. If you think me being respectful while taking to a senior member here is ass kissing, then I seriously feel sorry for you. Also you are right about that I have not earlier engaged in talks with The Pharmacist or even Lauda, that is because I was never before accused by them or anyone else earlier of being a fraud. I have to protect my reputation, especially since I am right.

kandholabhavna

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: actmyname on January 20, 2018, 04:27:46 AM

Quote from: kandholabhavna on January 19, 2018, 04:31:21 PM

Vod, you make a valid point about making up with a under age child. However, please bear in mind that I was NEW and did not even understand at that time that how blockchain worked, keep apart how this forum functioned.

Let me stop you right there. First off, ignorantia juris non excusat. Doesn't matter if you didn't know how the forum worked. If you break rules, then you are punished for it. Likewise, in real life, if you commit tax fraud not knowing it was illegal, you're not going to be acquitted purely because you were ignorant of the law.

Now that the key point is out of the way, there's another critical element in your underlying guilt:

For what reason did you want to buy an account?
I can almost guarantee it was not for a benevolent reason. Feel free to contradict this hypothesis.

Exactly, if one commits tax fraud even not knowing that it is illegal one should be definitely punished, but the thing is that I never did any fraud. Its like I just went to the tax attorney and asked them about what was going on. As far as the reason why I asked about it was that I went to the digital goods section in this forum and saw a lot of posts where people were selling or buying accounts. Out of natural curiosity I wanted to know if this was something legit and allowed or not here. Remember I asked IF IT WAS LEGIT OR NOT.

TheUltraElite

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1253

So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)

Quote from: kandholabhavna on January 20, 2018, 02:43:24 AM

Pharmacist, it is most commendable that members like you, Lauda and others are putting your time and effort to make this space secure and clean for others to use, else this would turn into a mad house for sure.

Stop that BS asslicking will ya? Its pretty naive and it gives you away - honestly. I never saw you kissing The Pharmacist's ass before this negative trust shitstorm appeared - prove me wrong?

Quote

You have mentioned that you will not revoke the negative trust as it does not makes sense because in that case there was no point in leaving it at the first place. However, in my humble opinion should this not vary from case to case? I don't know what kind of scams people are running over here that you guys are so bent on not changing your once made decision even after reviewing that what I asked was done in all innocence when I was NEW here and even to blockchain/crypto as overall. If you read another post made nearly about same time it is about asking people how and where to learn TA from. Do you think a scammer would not know about such a thing and ask such a dumb question? I sincerely hope that my overall behavior should be taken into consideration and I should not be given neg trust just because of 1 post that I made when I was new, also please note that I did not indulge in any such talks with any other members here after that particular post that got me negative rating. Looking forward to your and Lauda's kind consideration into the matter.

In cases where the person can prove beyond doubt that they are innocent - trust ratings MAYBE changed - depends on the discretion of the person giving you the trust rating - nobody can help that other than asking them politely about it.

For your case though like I have previously said account are sold to shady purposes and have nothing good to offer and I am sure you also had some shady purpose (wanted to abuse sig campaign? say no I dont care).

Bottom Line : we know you will be back with an alt account and start pooping in the forum like this again - characteristic of the shitposters. Get a life and a Job to earn and leave this forum.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: kandholabhavna on January 19, 2018, 04:31:21 PM

Vod, you make a valid point about making up with a under age child. However, please bear in mind that I was NEW and did not even understand at that time that how blockchain worked, keep apart how this forum functioned.

Let me stop you right there. First off, ignorantia juris non excusat. Doesn't matter if you didn't know how the forum worked. If you break rules, then you are punished for it. Likewise, in real life, if you commit tax fraud not knowing it was illegal, you're not going to be acquitted purely because you were ignorant of the law.

Now that the key point is out of the way, there's another critical element in your underlying guilt:

For what reason did you want to buy an account?
I can almost guarantee it was not for a benevolent reason. Feel free to contradict this hypothesis.

kandholabhavna

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 19, 2018, 06:56:52 PM

Sorry, but the feedback stays. I will try to be fair with the negatives, especially if someone has gained positive trust over an extended period of time...but I don't plan on removing much feedback that I've left. If I did that, there would be no point in leaving it in the first place.

Don't PM me about this--you can do it if you like, but set your expectations of a reply as low as the settings will allow so that you're not disappointed.

This forum has gone so far overboard with scamming, account dealing, farming, and garbage posting. I'm trying to do my part in improving it, but it's not going to be a soft-and-fluffy pillow session for people who are engaged in the aforementioned activities. And you all know who you are.

Pharmacist, it is most commendable that members like you, Lauda and others are putting your time and effort to make this space secure and clean for others to use, else this would turn into a mad house for sure.
You have mentioned that you will not revoke the negative trust as it does not makes sense because in that case there was no point in leaving it at the first place. However, in my humble opinion should this not vary from case to case? I don't know what kind of scams people are running over here that you guys are so bent on not changing your once made decision even after reviewing that what I asked was done in all innocence when I was NEW here and even to blockchain/crypto as overall. If you read another post made nearly about same time it is about asking people how and where to learn TA from. Do you think a scammer would not know about such a thing and ask such a dumb question? I sincerely hope that my overall behavior should be taken into consideration and I should not be given neg trust just because of 1 post that I made when I was new, also please note that I did not indulge in any such talks with any other members here after that particular post that got me negative rating. Looking forward to your and Lauda's kind consideration into the matter.

Topic: Kind attention- LAUDA & THE PHARMACIST (Read 871 times)