Pages:
Author

Topic: KnCMiner Jupiter Miner First Impressions (Read 65993 times)

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 502
November 28, 2013, 09:10:58 AM
how are you guys powering off your unit? i just got mine today. when i first got it going i was hashing at 667 and my pool also showed 667. i did a power shut down by turning off the psu and changed it to some other psu. then powered it back on and now i'm at 567 and pool is at 399. anyone having the same problem?

SSH > Halt
Wait for the blinding flash = remove socket from the wall
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
November 28, 2013, 02:48:54 AM
how are you guys powering off your unit? i just got mine today. when i first got it going i was hashing at 667 and my pool also showed 667. i did a power shut down by turning off the psu and changed it to some other psu. then powered it back on and now i'm at 567 and pool is at 399. anyone having the same problem?

Sounds like it may be a module issue. You may wish to check with knc support as I am not sure batch 1 firmware tools work on your new unit.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
November 28, 2013, 01:42:11 AM
how are you guys powering off your unit? i just got mine today. when i first got it going i was hashing at 667 and my pool also showed 667. i did a power shut down by turning off the psu and changed it to some other psu. then powered it back on and now i'm at 567 and pool is at 399. anyone having the same problem?
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 502
November 08, 2013, 06:28:35 PM
That is weird that there would be so much variance in reported power.


Most units are in the ~600W +/- 10% range and then there are some >700W?  That can't be explained by differences in power supply efficiency.

There are PSUs with 92% efficiency and there are PSUs with 80% efficiency, so that might be the case.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
November 08, 2013, 04:13:57 PM
That is weird that there would be so much variance in reported power.


Most units are in the ~600W +/- 10% range and then there are some >700W?  That can't be explained by differences in power supply efficiency.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
November 08, 2013, 01:44:54 PM
My Jupiter is using 700-800 Watts at the wall. The ASICs report using ~400 W. Anyone have an issue like this?

That seems insanely high how are you measuring wattage at the wall.

Kill-a-Watt

What firmware are you using? Same for waldohoover.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
November 07, 2013, 03:45:09 PM
My Jupiter is using 700-800 Watts at the wall. The ASICs report using ~400 W. Anyone have an issue like this?

That seems insanely high how are you measuring wattage at the wall.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 504
Run a Bitcoin node.
November 07, 2013, 04:00:07 AM
My Jupiter is using 700-800 Watts at the wall. The ASICs report using ~400 W. Anyone have an issue like this?

No.

In my Jupiter with FW 0.98, Bertmod reporting 572W, it's taking 668W at the wall, with OCZ 1000W Stealth PSU. Before, on FW 0.97, it was around 500W on BertMod and 580W at the wall.

What FW you're using?

0.98, Bertmod reports 555 W DC-DC. I use two PSUs, a 750W and 800W. Hoping to read maximum efficiency at 50% load.

Has anyone tried using 240V?

I am on 240V Europe. 668W on 1000W PSU on mine and yours are using 700-800W. You should read buy better PSU.

I'm on 240V in New Zealand, my Jupiter setup:
  • SeaSonic Platinum 1000W ATX12V power supply
  • KnCMiner firmware 0.98.1
  • 640W at wall
  • Bertmod reports total DC/DC power output: 567W
  • 550GH/s on pool as I type this*

* I'm super happy, I don't know why it's going so well right now, but I daren't touch it.  On 0.97 I was getting about 330GH/s.  On 0.98.1 the last few days the hash rate has varied, and I'm taking the precaution to reboot every night (as I did with 0.98).  This is because the hash rate at the pool dwindles down over time.  I would normally reboot now, since it has been a day since last reboot, but I can't bring myself to reboot since the performance is so good.

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
November 06, 2013, 07:50:01 PM
overclock tips?

thanks

I think 140GH/s per chip is the maximum, so not much room for overclock.

I'm getting 144GH/s per chip without overclock.

Ok then that's the maximum. Someone posted a formula with cores and speed, but i don't have it at hand, but you cant push chips faster than that because it's already their maximum.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
November 06, 2013, 05:32:54 PM
My Jupiter is using 700-800 Watts at the wall. The ASICs report using ~400 W. Anyone have an issue like this?

No.

In my Jupiter with FW 0.98, Bertmod reporting 572W, it's taking 668W at the wall, with OCZ 1000W Stealth PSU. Before, on FW 0.97, it was around 500W on BertMod and 580W at the wall.

What FW you're using?

0.98, Bertmod reports 555 W DC-DC. I use two PSUs, a 750W and 800W. Hoping to read maximum efficiency at 50% load.

Has anyone tried using 240V?

I am on 240V Europe. 668W on 1000W PSU on mine and yours are using 700-800W. You should read buy better PSU.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
November 06, 2013, 08:15:07 AM
overclock tips?

thanks

I think 140GH/s per chip is the maximum, so not much room for overclock.

I'm getting 144GH/s per chip without overclock.

Stability is also important.

Thus far firmware v0.9.8 has been stable.

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
November 06, 2013, 06:23:29 AM
overclock tips?

thanks

I think 140GH/s per chip is the maximum, so not much room for overclock.

I'm getting 144GH/s per chip without overclock.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
November 06, 2013, 05:34:00 AM
overclock tips?

thanks

I think 140GH/s per chip is the maximum, so not much room for overclock.
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
November 06, 2013, 04:44:30 AM
overclock tips?

thanks
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
November 05, 2013, 09:34:30 PM
My Jupiter is using 700-800 Watts at the wall. The ASICs report using ~400 W. Anyone have an issue like this?

No.

In my Jupiter with FW 0.98, Bertmod reporting 572W, it's taking 668W at the wall, with OCZ 1000W Stealth PSU. Before, on FW 0.97, it was around 500W on BertMod and 580W at the wall.

What FW you're using?

0.98, Bertmod reports 555 W DC-DC. I use two PSUs, a 750W and 800W. Hoping to read maximum efficiency at 50% load.

Has anyone tried using 240V?

Haven't tried 240, but I'd recommend a nice 1000W PSU over using those other 2 *(not sure what they are, not sure if an 800 could power all four modules)* - but I'm pretty sure you're pulling more power from the wall than you would with 1 really good 1000W PSU.



Personally, I'm running a Seasonic 1000 platinum and my Jupiter is now reporting 564 at the web interface (been running 4 days now, was at 563 for the last couple days) -- pool reports anything from 520 to 600.

Back on topic, I have no idea how much I'm pulling, (I'm running 0.81) but the PSU barely even gets that warm. (If I had to guess I'd say around 10-15 degrees above ambient - regular mode, never tried the hybrid mode)

Bottom line. Even though I can't test the power at the wall, the low temperature of the PSU leads me to think that it is extremely efficient at whatever load it's pulling. I highly recommend this PSU as a great choice to power a Jupiter. (just my personal experience, and no, I'm not getting paid by Seasonic)

just a couple reviews:
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/11/01/seasonic_platinum1000_1_kilowatt_power_supply_review#.UnmnlhAyxaQ
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/seasonic_1000w_platinum_power_supply_review,1.html
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/5097/seasonic_platinum_1000w_80_plus_platinum_power_supply_review/index.html
http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=264
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
November 04, 2013, 03:48:44 PM
My Jupiter is using 700-800 Watts at the wall. The ASICs report using ~400 W. Anyone have an issue like this?

No.

In my Jupiter with FW 0.98, Bertmod reporting 572W, it's taking 668W at the wall, with OCZ 1000W Stealth PSU. Before, on FW 0.97, it was around 500W on BertMod and 580W at the wall.

What FW you're using?
hero member
Activity: 539
Merit: 517
October 31, 2013, 02:52:16 PM
Firmware 0.961 is a different one. It came out before 0.97.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 502
October 31, 2013, 02:46:08 PM
0.98 isn't working out for me.
Back to 0.97.
Do you have any idea why KNC removed 0.97 from their website?
I wasn't aware of that Shocked
It's a good thing I keep a copy on my computer. Here's a link for those how want to download firmware 0.97 : http://1t4pro.1fichier.com/en/index.html

Maybe they renamed it to KnCMiner firmware 0.9.6.1?
Or KnCMiner firmware 0.9.6.1 is a different one?

https://www.kncminer.com/pages/support
hero member
Activity: 539
Merit: 517
October 31, 2013, 02:30:51 PM
0.98 isn't working out for me.
Back to 0.97.
Do you have any idea why KNC removed 0.97 from their website?
I wasn't aware of that Shocked
It's a good thing I keep a copy on my computer. Here's a link for those how want to download firmware 0.97 : http://1t4pro.1fichier.com/en/index.html
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 502
October 31, 2013, 02:16:21 PM
0.98 isn't working out for me.
Back to 0.97.


Do you have any idea why KNC removed 0.97 from their website?
Pages:
Jump to: