Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 73. (Read 6981 times)
i think know your costumer is the biggest hurdle for bounty hunters. I would not want my identity to be in the hands of foreigners.
I think this is good for preventing the occurrence of bounty cheats such as multi accounts, and also KYC is very helpful to collect valid participant data, and make bounty participants not only silent waiting when it has completed its task, but is required to continue to monitor the progress of the project
I think that this is just alright for the bounty hunters to undergo in KYC or Know Your Customer in order for the management of the cryptocurrency projects will know if they are farmers or not or if there is something to worry from their bounty hunters or not. There is no bad effects for me in having or undergoing into a KYC because it brings positive results in both sides.
Personally, I hate this new regulation since we don't know what will happen to our private information when we send to them. They may sell our ID to the third party or use for malicious activity if they are scammers
I cannot totally understand what is this for and I cant seem get to follow the instructions in how to join it. It is way too complicatedvby nature I believe. What happens if KYC was not used during after ICO? In which in my case is true. Were not bye ng pain for our work?
Like many people who wrote here, I am absolutely against any sort of companies like SEC and so on, in general, that they either integrate into the crypto world. Especially KYC for bounty hunters is idiocy.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
it so good way to minimum fake account so it can really the receiver reward is real man not fake accounti agree with this way
I think I will agree on this because there are many fake accounts join the bounty campaign and that's not fair according to me. About privacy of documents that to risky for us but the ICO company that held the bounty they have rights to ask about KYC. i agree that ICO owner must state in the first place that the bounty hunter has to join KYC verification so the bounty hunter can choose to join the bounty campaign or not. Thanks
There are many ways to avoid fake accounts for bounty campaigns, KYC for bounty hunters is not reasonable imo. We are on crypto world which should be stay anonymous. Absolutely we have our own opinion whether to accept KYC or not, but for me KYC for bounty hunters does not make any senses. I would not join any bounties with this requirement. No guarantees that our document will be used in a good way, it does not worth the risks.
I think there may be more and more projects to do this.
However, I find it somewhat unacceptable.
If I would like to take part to a signature compaign and just want to earn extra money, it may not be a lot of money, but it requires my personal information, I think I will choose not to participate.
And I think this is not a decentralized coin/token.
However, I find it somewhat unacceptable.
If I would like to take part to a signature compaign and just want to earn extra money, it may not be a lot of money, but it requires my personal information, I think I will choose not to participate.
And I think this is not a decentralized coin/token.
This must be a bad idea, and many ICO projects are themselves a fraud.
Then these ICO projects collect KYC data and are likely to sell our KYC data twice, so I refuse to submit KYC data (if the bounty thread needs to).
Then these ICO projects collect KYC data and are likely to sell our KYC data twice, so I refuse to submit KYC data (if the bounty thread needs to).
Its true, bounty programs are now asking for confidential informations. Crypto was meant to be anonymous but seems things are gradually changing.
I really think it's a very bad idea because not everybody can have access to kyc requirements and the painful part is that people would have already work for them before telling them to do kyc which is bad.
Some projects probably started the KYC verification for bounty hunters to eliminate multiple registrations. I personally do not like to go through KYC for anything. I have avoided ICO's that require it because if the project ends up being a scam, they now have my personal information.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I just take positive steps for all the steps we have to fulfill. although I am a little confused, why bounty hunters do KYC verification. but it is a must to follow every applicable rule. so I responded casually.
KYC for bounty participants will be very effective to ensure participants are not involved in crime, but this is not good because bounty hounters earn only a small salary and no need for KYC because KYC is only suitable for investors who have big profits.
we need to do something about these this is not safe for us they might sold the identity to others and use it from crimes
I am absolutely against giving ICO my personal data, much less copies of identity documents. Campaign signatories can not be suspected of being able to launder money or conduct other illegal transactions because they do not invest their money. They are only engaged in advertising the ICO campaign and are not associated with any money, and for their work receive issued tokens. Moreover, if the KYC requirement is presented already after the completion of the ICO, and, it turns out, only for the purpose of non-payment of earned tokens.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
If this was a condition from the beginning then you can choose to accept the conditions or not and I hope people do not accept that ridiculous condition, but if that was not a condition and then they try to do this then this is in my opinion an attempt to scam their users, most bounty programs do not pay their participants until the end of the ico and that may take weeks or months so all their efforts were wasted. 
I think I will agree on this because there are many fake accounts join the bounty campaign and that's not fair according to me. About privacy of documents that to risky for us but the ICO company that held the bounty they have rights to ask about KYC. i agree that ICO owner must state in the first place that the bounty hunter has to join KYC verification so the bounty hunter can choose to join the bounty campaign or not. Thanks
I agree to this, as you can imagine if someone uses dozens of accounts to participate in a bounty? that is very bad. and harming other members
Jump to: