wearing KYC in bounty has pros and contrast after I examine more people who disagree in comparison who agree.
and I'm one of those people who disagree with using KYC for bounty hunter.
just leave the project using KYC to bounty hunter because they have no right to misuse our personal data.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 69. (Read 6981 times)
If campaigns ever start asking for identification, that will be the end of it for me. As the member above said, that shit could easily wind up on the bad doings you just never know.Hopefully they will include this in their original announcement, not just spring it on you after the campaign has ended, so the campaigns can be avoided.
Actually now i know more project need kyc to proof that the participant is not fake.
Its not really good in cryptocurrency for future because we dont what they will do with our ID. I think we need to avoid this kind of project.
Its not really good in cryptocurrency for future because we dont what they will do with our ID. I think we need to avoid this kind of project.
I think that's right. Bounty hunters have to pass KYC like a investors ico
I agree. 
More often KYC documentation is requested by banks, brokerage houses, registration agents or legal companies, audit firms, financial intermediaries. I don"t understand what is the advantage of crypto if it ceases to be anonymous.
KYC is good if all ICO's are legit but what if we choose the ICO's Bounty then they used our ID for there own interest and not legit.It is nice to conduct KYC but we should prepared for the right ICO to make us eligible for given our legit information for us an individual bitcoiners.But I hope after we conduct KYC everyone must be responsible enough to give their information.I really believe the run of this system so what is their plan It makes me approved.The most important right now is we should continue our life to cryptocurrency especially in bitcoin.Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
In my own opinion,this is another task they give all of us being a bounty hunters participants.doing a KYC is another kind of burden,because we need to accomplish those requirments they need,in order to claim our tokens,but to me in my thought its not supposedly good to us a bounty participants because this requirnents intended only for ICO participants.I think that's right. Bounty hunters have to pass KYC like a investors ico
Why do you think that? Your post sound like unfinished thought. Explain yourself, why bounty hunter has to pass KYC? Are we investors or something? KYC is for those who are buying tokens during ICO, because ICO is banned in some countries and they need to know that you are not coming from such country. I don't see any other reason.. Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I really don't agree on that because we are just a bounty hunters, they don't need anymore our information because we din't invest on them. We just do bounty campaign, it will not concern anymore of Anti Money Laundering. We work for it so don't need anymore.
This is not very comfortable, but if it needed, no problem - i do. However need to resign oneself for this
Well, I don't like it, but I think that - due to international regulations - it will happen more and more often.
The cryptomarket can be a far west forever, so we must accept this kind of annoyances.
The cryptomarket can be a far west forever, so we must accept this kind of annoyances.
I'm very worried. Theoretically we don't do anything wrong, but we have no idea how our data will be used.
My be the ICO is just organized by federal institutions just to collect some addresses.
Or may be they will sell our data on the black market: think about, what a malicious guy can do on the deep web with a copy of our passport...
My be the ICO is just organized by federal institutions just to collect some addresses.
Or may be they will sell our data on the black market: think about, what a malicious guy can do on the deep web with a copy of our passport...
This is outrageous, cryptocurrencies were created with the intention of anonymity in the first place. But, I guess, where there is money, there will always be some sort of regulation. I understand this for serious exchangers, because they have to comply with anti-laundering and terrorist prevention laws. But, KYC required for bounties? Seriously... It's like I want to launder my 100$ through the bounty, LOL. And how would I even do that, I am not depositing anything, on the contrary, I am earning tokens. So, this is total BS for me. Which bounties require KYC, so I stay away from them?
I just can't stand that KYC stuff, why do I have to send my personal info to somebody when I'm working with DEcentralized currency?! 
The requirement to proceed with KYC for bounty hunters is what I start noticing more frequently lately. Think it is inevitable development and hunters community doesn't have any choice but accept the new reality.
We made additional bounty functionality to our ecex.exchange platform project: Ziggurat token TELEGRAM BOUNTY - JOIN OUR CHANNEL AND GET 30 ZIG
IN-HOUSE BOUNTY https://ecex.exchange
IN-HOUSE BOUNTY https://ecex.exchange
Not all ICOs that have KYC for investors, have the same requirement for bounty hunters. That last few ICOs I have seen had KYC but the bounty hunters did not need to submit anything. If KYC is an issue for you, I would look for the ICOs that don't have KYC for bounty hunters. Although KYC might protect the bounty pool from multi-accounts.
The fact is that if the law of the country does not presuppose a sale, then no one has the right to require each member of the Bounty companies to provide their personal data. I understand when this is important for investors, but not members of the Bounty Company. I think that all the bounties of the company will be required to pass KYC. Therefore, you should get used to the new realities. Especially in my opinion the company's demand to pass KYC says that this company will not be a scoundrel.
I think you're wrong. That a project requests the KYC from investors doesn't guarantee anything at all. A scam project can request the KYC to give an appearance of seriousness and rigor, and to give investors confidence. But it will remain a scam. And not only they will steal the money of the investors, but also with their personal data.This is something that I'm coming across a fair bit of lately, ICOs that promise there will be rigorous KYC in place as well as complying with many international laws only for it to be lies just to encourage investor confidence. KYC is a good thing but it's not a means to decipher between a scam project and a legitimate project.
Not all ICOs that have KYC for investors, have the same requirement for bounty hunters. That last few ICOs I have seen had KYC but the bounty hunters did not need to submit anything. If KYC is an issue for you, I would look for the ICOs that don't have KYC for bounty hunters. Although KYC might protect the bounty pool from multi-accounts.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I do not understand why do they need my passport details, I do not buy their tokens. I sent photos of the passport only to 1 company and I closed some of the data. I think that all the bounties of the company will be required to pass KYC. Therefore, you should get used to the new realities. Especially in my opinion the company's demand to pass KYC says that this company will not be a scoundrel.
I think you're wrong. That a project requests the KYC from investors doesn't guarantee anything at all. A scam project can request the KYC to give an appearance of seriousness and rigor, and to give investors confidence. But it will remain a scam. And not only they will steal the money of the investors, but also with their personal data. Jump to: