Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 68. (Read 6981 times)
Honestly speaking KYC issues has turned to something else though am not against it but it's should be well announced and boldly written on the bounty campaign rules on the other hand KYC is strictly meant for investors not for bounty hunters because it has to advantage for some ICO companies to take hunters paid back to their pocket in the name of not filling KYC form well I guess this issue should be address.
due to the multiple accounts that cause the prize pool to be small,
I agree with the KYC program for all bounty campaigns
I agree with the KYC program for all bounty campaigns
Do you really think that bounty hunters with many accounts wouldn't be happy to enroll for the KYC all their bothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, grandfathers, grandmothers and relatives up to the third of fourth grade? KYC for bounty hunters suck and that's all. Full stop.
Yes, it's too risky to give your data to an unknown entity. I saw that there are also some airdrop that ask to make a KYC just for ridiculous sums.
I suspect there is an hidden interest in this, and I stay away.
I suspect there is an hidden interest in this, and I stay away.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
This is a problem indeed.
I hope that US and other countries will allow ICOs soon so they wont have to ask for KYC, because i do not trust these projects with my data.
Maybe they dont have bad intentions and are trying to keep ID data safe but in any case, most ICOs wont bother with going extra mile for your data protection.
I dont get the Idea why bounty hunters need KYC. I open this also to OPEN MONEY why we need to submit KYC. Im still on stage of protesting to the new Rules of OPEN MONEY bounty. Hope someone will join me for the protest.
For this reason.
A lot of Hunters join the OPEN MONEY bounty with no KYC requirement and the in the middle of the bounty they Need KYC. I believed this is just strategy of OPEN MONEY because if KYC implemented a lot of Hunter will no longer interested to claim the TOKEN because they want still anonymous. which i think very wrong and not fair
#Datarius
For this reason.
A lot of Hunters join the OPEN MONEY bounty with no KYC requirement and the in the middle of the bounty they Need KYC. I believed this is just strategy of OPEN MONEY because if KYC implemented a lot of Hunter will no longer interested to claim the TOKEN because they want still anonymous. which i think very wrong and not fair
#Datarius
I understand Bounty managers who use KYC in order to avoid multiplication of cheaters... but it kills the essential of Cryptos : anonymity.
I did KYC once for an airdrop, and it resulted positive (Polymath). I wouldn't send selfie with ID card for a project I'm not sure of.
I did KYC once for an airdrop, and it resulted positive (Polymath). I wouldn't send selfie with ID card for a project I'm not sure of.
that's the horror of KYC for me, i haven't heard any identity theft yet regarding these KYC but i hope it will never happened because it could shake the ICO programs and bounty campaigns and to be honest as a bounty hunter joining campaign could give us pretty good amount of profit.
Horror for everybody if the company use the identity for something bad because we dont wheater its really keep secret or they will use it for another thing.
However, kyc is good to follow if the project is good. We need to make sure just join the good ico.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think its ok if they need to ask our KYC but in other hand it's risky because it's our personal information mostly the identification. I think for me ICO's need KYC or investor only not for the bounty hunters. Bounty hunters help a campaign to know all people what campaign they have or spread the world their project so I think bounty hunter don't need KYC because it's big helpful for their project. Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I really hate this, we should not those kind of projects. In my opinion there is no need to give these sensible information to a random company you not really know. I just have to say it again. Take care of your sensible information.
All the best,
Peterparker9191
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
In my opinion, there is something new that they want to develop with the system they created, and that is also to avoid multiple accounts. Because the KYC system that is in INS asks us to fill out the bio and upload ID National.
Just a moment: may be I must identify myself, but before I want to be sure about the identity of the company who wants to identify me:
there are a lot of scammers there, it's very simple to simulate an airdrop, to promise some cheap money, and to collect data and sell them on the black market.
So, at present, is someone ask a copy of my passport, I renounce immediately and leave.
there are a lot of scammers there, it's very simple to simulate an airdrop, to promise some cheap money, and to collect data and sell them on the black market.
So, at present, is someone ask a copy of my passport, I renounce immediately and leave.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
KYC is actually a bit horrible because we give a very important identity to others I am worried about the identity we have in use for criminal acts.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Maybe it's a good point. Invested in some ICOs and had to submit my KYC afterwards. It was stressful for me. Cause I usually panic more than other people without a reason)) and KYC after the bounty and work performed will be more stressful cause you do your fair work and spend time with your favorite project instead of watching a movie))Not every ico does really have the K.Y.C. thing because some of the countries does not require this legality. The best thing about K.Y.C. is to get more legit customers and it makes the ico even more popular to earn more consumers that will invest on their coin.
i dont understand why even the hero members against it. its pretty straight forward, they wanna know whom they are giving their coins..Am i missing something?
Because the members of this forum, participating in the campaigns of generosity, namely in signature campaigns, are entitled to do this on an anonymous basis. If campaigns request personal information before joining a campaign, this is one. Here, a forum member simply can not join such a campaign, he has the right to choose. However, most ICO campaigns begin to expose such data after the end of the ICO. And this is done only for the purpose of non-payment of earned tokens, since in this case the participant of the signature campaign is not given a choice and if he does not agree to provide his identification data, he must leave without claiming earned tokens. The point is that such a requirement of the company should be put forward at the beginning of the campaign before joining, and not after the work done, because this is more like a scam on the part of such bounty companies.
i dont understand why even the hero members against it. its pretty straight forward, they wanna know whom they are giving their coins..Am i missing something?
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I prefer to participate on a campaign that has K.Y.C. policy because in this way there will be more investors who will trust their platform to succeed. The only downside of having a K.Y.C. campaign is, sometimes they are asking their participants about K.Y.C. before giving the payout and that's what makes them reduce their popularity because it was like a scam if they do that after the end of sale.
I agree with KYC because this might reduce the fraud rate that occurs with multiple account usage
If you really want to stop crime it should be the people conducting the ICO that go through a KYC process.
Having unregulated and unlicensed entities collecting personal identity information makes no sense at all.
Having unregulated and unlicensed entities collecting personal identity information makes no sense at all.
That bounty will not be much of a success for sure. KYC are imposed only for those who want to invest and bounty hunters don't invest but only get and even if crypto is banned on that receiver's country, he can still fly to other country and spend it.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
For me it is bad idea! There are a lot of bounty campaigns are scam and not promising. Be careful when the bounty campaigns ask your identity like KYC. People can use your identity in a bad way. Always be careful when you are sending your I.D. Jump to: