Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 82. (Read 6981 times)
I also don't understand why is it some of the projects are asking for KYC specially in bounty hunters.As far as i know bounty hunters are helping them to promote their projects and it doesn't make sense if they ask for KYC or no,the important is the project goes well.Knowing their personal identity is a big NO NO for me.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Will ,in my own opinion,i didnt't like this kind of protocol of ICO, to the bounty hunters because its an additional burden to your work participation in the campaign,you must sacrifice mostly all your time in the bounty and in the end they doubtfull to you,and they thinks your an other person,so for me there where is the justice.people joining the bounty to help the ICO campaign become more succesfull and not to known the personality of the people. 
KYC for bounty hounter is less good although the purpose is to get evidence from the participants. but I think KYC is less suitable in the allocation for investors who follow a project. so if for bounty hounter is not right.
I am not comfortable giving up personal info at ICo's and even more so on the bounty campaigns. Having your personal docs sold in the dark web is really scary.
I really do not understand the reason behind this request. if it is for investors to do KYC, I have no issue may be the company want to be sure that the fund is from a clean source. but for a bounty hunter who did not invest a dime i really do not get it.
It already looks like a kind of fraud. The fact is that these campaigns do not warn in advance that they will require additional data from the signatory campaigner and begin to demand them when the work has already been agreed. This can hardly be called a verification of the requirement to prevent persons with multiple accounts. otherwise such a check would be made before the signature campaign or in the process of it. The meaning of all additional data requirements, including identification data, precisely after the ICO has been completed,
in my opinion, is to exclude as many people as possible from the applicants for the demand for a stipulated award. I believe that even at this stage the nomination of such requirements is unacceptable.
in my opinion, is to exclude as many people as possible from the applicants for the demand for a stipulated award. I believe that even at this stage the nomination of such requirements is unacceptable.
why u need KYC in the decentralised world and moreover Satoshi created cryptographic to show annominity for bitcoin world
No need if they are not buying any tokens and only earning them by their work.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
pros:
- that can avoid bounty hunters from scamming a project (multiple account, etc.), the campaign will be more effective because it will be spreaded by more real people.
cons:
- cryptocurrency born to be annonymous? if yes, why we need a KYC?
- KYC is for a legal and registered company, if a project need a KYC from their supporter, they need to be a legal and registered company first. we dont want an illegal and unregistered company misused our private data.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Most of the participants want to remain anonymous and not go through the KYC identification procedure, and this will repel them from participating in the bounty. Reducing the number of participants will lead to poor advertising of the project.
sometimes there are some bounty that ask participants to provide data in order to get payment. so participants must provide in order to claim the payment.
I think it is one of the most disturbing things but there is also the positive side
I think it is one of the most disturbing things but there is also the positive side
KYC a ridiculous system for crypto world. Everyone here wants to stay anonymous and work that way.
It is stupid to hand over our identity to someone else to earn small bucks
It is stupid to hand over our identity to someone else to earn small bucks
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I have also encountered the same issue but have also noticed that most ICO's which have asked their ICO participants for kyc are the ones which ask for kyc from bounty hunters also. A way out of this could be to avoid ICO's which require kyc from ICO participants and promote ICO's that do not need ICO participants to do kyc.
The bad thing is that anonymity of users is lost, since the cryptocurrency was originally thought up as anonymous currency without having to enter your data, for me the new rules are very strange
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Bounty hunters should not go in for such Bounties, especially if it’s not from a reliable source. KYC is major information, anyone can take advantage of it.
However, there is a less probability to stop this practice as the number of bounty hunters is growing on a large scale, everyone is trying to get airdrops.
This is really the best thing i ever heard. Too many scammers around with multiple accounts so this will be the end of account farming.
I hope every campaign will do the same!
I hope every campaign will do the same!
This is normal. It seems to me that in 2018 bounty hunters will pass KYC in almost all the bounties. In this way, company bounties will struggle with multi-accounts. Therefore, bounty hunters need to get used to this.
In fact, the struggle with multi-accounts. is not the first point that pursues KYS. They just want to know everything about you and your money, where, why, how much. So it will be easier to beat out tax payments from you, since now it is difficult with this. And the fight against multi-accounts does not interest them at all. They can say as much as they please that this is not true, but the reality is this. On the other hand, we are ordinary people who advertise the project, why should they know everything about us? we are not investors with millions of dollars.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I've noticed that airdrops and faucets are asking for this shit as well. It's complete bullshit. There's no reason why they need that data. How do you think they would react if potential investors asked these fuckers to post their ID on their announcement posts and websites? Somehow I doubt they would be willing to do that, so why should they expect it from anyone else? It's not as if they're dealing with fiat here so there's no banking protocols that they need to follow. Unfortunately, there will always be gullible people who won't see the potential downsides to this and will willingly fork over their personal data in exchange for a couple quick bucks. I guess they'll just have to learn the hard way.
It is really dangerous to give somebody a copy of your ID card or driver license. They can commit fraud in many ways with your data.
Google: Identity fraud.
Google: Identity fraud.
You'd think people would be more cautious of their identity/personal details, especially people who are into crypto and know the importance of privacy.
It's crazy to me that someone would just send their ID to a random person on the internet like that.
It is really dangerous to give somebody a copy of your ID card or driver license. They can commit fraud in many ways with your data.
Google: Identity fraud.
Google: Identity fraud.
You'd think people would be more cautious of their identity/personal details, especially people who are into crypto and know the importance of privacy.
It's crazy to me that someone would just send their ID to a random person on the internet like that.
Jump to: