Topic: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement - page 143. (Read 452290 times)
January 14, 2014, 10:15:51 AM
About three days and no posts. This is about as quiet as I've seen this thread.
January 11, 2014, 03:12:56 PM
Dividends out
Mined: BTC 58.00613383
Paid Out: BTC 43.50460037
Per Bond: BTC 0.000739975
-----------------------------------
Alt Coin Update
-----------------------------------
NMC: 3344.89601005
IXC: 299.61190115
DVC: 10434.11898957
Referral Bonus for GHS: 55.73350548
-----------------------------------
Total Payout
-----------------------------------
2014: BTC 89.46616319
All-Time: BTC 1,101.25426764
Mined: BTC 58.00613383
Paid Out: BTC 43.50460037
Per Bond: BTC 0.000739975
-----------------------------------
Alt Coin Update
-----------------------------------
NMC: 3344.89601005
IXC: 299.61190115
DVC: 10434.11898957
Referral Bonus for GHS: 55.73350548
-----------------------------------
Total Payout
-----------------------------------
2014: BTC 89.46616319
All-Time: BTC 1,101.25426764
January 11, 2014, 03:05:47 PM
Good plan, I've been looking into tuning my gear for efficiency, think it will need it by early summer, then will be less of a handful in the heat also.
Divs got here, thanks.
Divs got here, thanks.
January 11, 2014, 03:04:53 PM
Looks like dividends went out 
I'm estimating ~BTC0.00073997 per bond
I'm estimating ~BTC0.00073997 per bond
January 11, 2014, 02:12:57 PM
Labrat.
Have you investigated how the Bitfury hashing might be optimized by hacking the circuits and using external clocking? I'm not sure if that makes sense to you right off, but I've read that it could increase the efficiency quite a bit. To be clear, I'm not sure how it might or might not increase the hashing rate, but it should reduce the electrical consumption if I'm not mistaken.
Have you investigated how the Bitfury hashing might be optimized by hacking the circuits and using external clocking? I'm not sure if that makes sense to you right off, but I've read that it could increase the efficiency quite a bit. To be clear, I'm not sure how it might or might not increase the hashing rate, but it should reduce the electrical consumption if I'm not mistaken.
I've talked to Dave about how to tweak the equipment once all cards are hashing properly and how to make cards hash if they aren't hashing. He also explained how to change clocks to get the highest hashrate and how to get the most power efficient hashrate once the difficulty increases.
January 11, 2014, 02:01:01 PM
Labrat.
Have you investigated how the Bitfury hashing might be optimized by hacking the circuits and using external clocking? I'm not sure if that makes sense to you right off, but I've read that it could increase the efficiency quite a bit. To be clear, I'm not sure how it might or might not increase the hashing rate, but it should reduce the electrical consumption if I'm not mistaken.
Have you investigated how the Bitfury hashing might be optimized by hacking the circuits and using external clocking? I'm not sure if that makes sense to you right off, but I've read that it could increase the efficiency quite a bit. To be clear, I'm not sure how it might or might not increase the hashing rate, but it should reduce the electrical consumption if I'm not mistaken.
January 11, 2014, 01:41:39 PM
Any chance at getting photos of all the hardware and not only a single BFL rig and one or two BitFury boards?
Not that I think it, but theoretically, how could anyone prove this is still not a ponzi scheme? Except, maybe by the hash-rate in the pool.
Bitcoins + hardware value collected: upwards of BTC7500
Bitcoins paid out: just over BTC1000
Take us on a small tour. Even if it's a mess and not as pretty as ASICminer's facility. It's still something. Besides, we can see a before and after if LRM is ever proven successful for long term.
Not that I think it, but theoretically, how could anyone prove this is still not a ponzi scheme? Except, maybe by the hash-rate in the pool.
Bitcoins + hardware value collected: upwards of BTC7500
Bitcoins paid out: just over BTC1000
Take us on a small tour. Even if it's a mess and not as pretty as ASICminer's facility. It's still something. Besides, we can see a before and after if LRM is ever proven successful for long term.
That hashrate bar here: http://www.labratmining.com/currentHashrate.php
isn't anything to talk down about as that is a lot of hardware, but that's just a portion as I was trying to avoid helping CEX go over the top of 50%. I'll be moving more over soon now that they are back into the low 30s
January 11, 2014, 01:39:33 PM
(.....) when I shoot some pics to grnbrg (....)
grnbrg.
Today after paying Divs I'll be there working on tweaking some rigs. If I finish it up I'll get some out there.
January 11, 2014, 01:03:46 PM
(.....) when I shoot some pics to grnbrg (....)
grnbrg.
January 11, 2014, 12:59:12 PM
Ask Dave, I've made orders and received the first of 2. The second one is over 6 times the size of the first.
I have made sure that when I shoot some pics to grnbrg that he wipes EXIF. I've made sure location data "should" be off.
I have been tweaking hardware at the first office which has bumped the stable hashrate up from 13.8TH to ~15 and still have a few rigs I can work on. Once I finish tweaking those I'll be cleaning up a bit and showing you LRMs (Not quite as awesome as ASICMiners
) facility.
Finalizing the spreadsheet for divs this week BTW.
EDIT: The hashrate readout on the sig bar from CEX appears to be slightly low compared to the line graph provided on the site.
I have made sure that when I shoot some pics to grnbrg that he wipes EXIF. I've made sure location data "should" be off.
I have been tweaking hardware at the first office which has bumped the stable hashrate up from 13.8TH to ~15 and still have a few rigs I can work on. Once I finish tweaking those I'll be cleaning up a bit and showing you LRMs (Not quite as awesome as ASICMiners
) facility.Finalizing the spreadsheet for divs this week BTW.
EDIT: The hashrate readout on the sig bar from CEX appears to be slightly low compared to the line graph provided on the site.
January 11, 2014, 10:42:12 AM
LabRat, (I probably don't have to tell you) double check that you scrub EXIF data from any photos you may post. I'd hate to hear that someone broke into one of the mining center and stole/broke stuff.
The few photos he's given me to post have not had location data in them, but I've removed the EXIF data completely anyway. Lab_Rat has had that thought, as have I.
grnbrg.
January 11, 2014, 02:39:31 AM
Any chance at getting photos of all the hardware and not only a single BFL rig and one or two BitFury boards?
This would be cool!LabRat, (I probably don't have to tell you) double check that you scrub EXIF data from any photos you may post. I'd hate to hear that someone broke into one of the mining center and stole/broke stuff.
January 11, 2014, 01:20:57 AM
Any chance at getting photos of all the hardware and not only a single BFL rig and one or two BitFury boards?
Not that I think it, but theoretically, how could anyone prove this is still not a ponzi scheme? Except, maybe by the hash-rate in the pool.
Bitcoins + hardware value collected: upwards of BTC7500
Bitcoins paid out: just over BTC1000
Take us on a small tour. Even if it's a mess and not as pretty as ASICminer's facility. It's still something. Besides, we can see a before and after if LRM is ever proven successful for long term.
Not that I think it, but theoretically, how could anyone prove this is still not a ponzi scheme? Except, maybe by the hash-rate in the pool.
Bitcoins + hardware value collected: upwards of BTC7500
Bitcoins paid out: just over BTC1000
Take us on a small tour. Even if it's a mess and not as pretty as ASICminer's facility. It's still something. Besides, we can see a before and after if LRM is ever proven successful for long term.
January 10, 2014, 11:59:36 PM
Labrat, can you give us an update on where all the LRM hardware orders are at? IE: number of TH from which vendor, and expected time to delivery for that specific hardware order?
I know this has probably been covered in other posts, however I'd like to see a current post-holiday update from Labrat directly.
Thanks kindly.
I know this has probably been covered in other posts, however I'd like to see a current post-holiday update from Labrat directly.
Thanks kindly.
I'm working on that, I've pretty well got final numbers together for outstanding orders. The Bitfury deal with Dave is pretty finalized and that's the only thing I'm not ready to release at this time.
January 10, 2014, 11:57:43 PM
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
+1
Or/And for the ASIC project
That would be included in hardware.
January 10, 2014, 08:02:12 PM
Labrat, can you give us an update on where all the LRM hardware orders are at? IE: number of TH from which vendor, and expected time to delivery for that specific hardware order?
I know this has probably been covered in other posts, however I'd like to see a current post-holiday update from Labrat directly.
Thanks kindly.
I know this has probably been covered in other posts, however I'd like to see a current post-holiday update from Labrat directly.
Thanks kindly.
January 10, 2014, 07:36:40 PM
I'm not planning on buying GHS on CEX, no worries.
But I'm also not moving over the rest of the HW due to the high network percentage.
Buying back bonds right now is just not a good idea as I'm trying to raise as much funds as possible to get LRM to expand. There are a couple projects going on that are limiting LRMs flow of cash making that move irresponsible.
I'd have no problem with this in April or so.
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
But I'm also not moving over the rest of the HW due to the high network percentage.
Buying back bonds right now is just not a good idea as I'm trying to raise as much funds as possible to get LRM to expand. There are a couple projects going on that are limiting LRMs flow of cash making that move irresponsible.
I'd have no problem with this in April or so.
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
It seems expanding LRM will be an ongoing process. When would you do a bond buy-back?
In principle, buying back bonds is a good move for LRM & bond holders. It would increase weekly monies useful for more hardware purchases (i.e. LRM would expand faster) and increase dividends for bond holders (not to mention sustaining or even growing value per bond). And I wouldn't classify any good move as irresponsible. Unless perhaps, you know that you have another move or project that can easily beat bond buy-backs for the long term. For example, if you could acquire a better than bond GH/BTC rate immediately in the form of hardware, then that might be better than a bond buy-back on the front end (not necessarily better for the long run; I'd have to do some math) - i.e. better for LRM & bond holders. Or if you had some mega clearance level deal in the works a month off, which hasn't been disclosed, then that might be better than a buy-back.
If you don't know that your specific intentions are better or not, then share your intentions more often, you could take advantage of group think on potential moves for LRM & bond holders. There are plenty of intelligent people with vested interest in LRM success tracking this.
January 10, 2014, 06:14:26 PM
I'm not planning on buying GHS on CEX, no worries.
But I'm also not moving over the rest of the HW due to the high network percentage.
Buying back bonds right now is just not a good idea as I'm trying to raise as much funds as possible to get LRM to expand. There are a couple projects going on that are limiting LRMs flow of cash making that move irresponsible.
I'd have no problem with this in April or so.
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
But I'm also not moving over the rest of the HW due to the high network percentage.
Buying back bonds right now is just not a good idea as I'm trying to raise as much funds as possible to get LRM to expand. There are a couple projects going on that are limiting LRMs flow of cash making that move irresponsible.
I'd have no problem with this in April or so.
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
It seems expanding LRM will be an ongoing process. When would you do a bond buy-back?
In principle, buying back bonds is a good move for LRM & bond holders. It would increase weekly monies useful for more hardware purchases (i.e. LRM would expand faster) and increase dividends for bond holders (not to mention sustaining or even growing value per bond). And I wouldn't classify any good move as irresponsible. Unless perhaps, you know that you have another move or project that can easily beat bond buy-backs for the long term. For example, if you could acquire a better than bond GH/BTC rate immediately in the form of hardware, then that might be better than a bond buy-back on the front end (not necessarily better for the long run; I'd have to do some math) - i.e. better for LRM & bond holders. Or if you had some mega clearance level deal in the works a month off, which hasn't been disclosed, then that might be better than a buy-back.
If you don't know that your specific intentions are better or not, then share your intentions more often, you could take advantage of group think on potential moves for LRM & bond holders. There are plenty of intelligent people with vested interest in LRM success tracking this.
January 10, 2014, 03:00:55 PM
I'm not planning on buying GHS on CEX, no worries.
But I'm also not moving over the rest of the HW due to the high network percentage.
Buying back bonds right now is just not a good idea as I'm trying to raise as much funds as possible to get LRM to expand. There are a couple projects going on that are limiting LRMs flow of cash making that move irresponsible.
I'd have no problem with this in April or so.
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
But I'm also not moving over the rest of the HW due to the high network percentage.
Buying back bonds right now is just not a good idea as I'm trying to raise as much funds as possible to get LRM to expand. There are a couple projects going on that are limiting LRMs flow of cash making that move irresponsible.
I'd have no problem with this in April or so.
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
Are we going to be part of 21e6?
January 10, 2014, 01:39:15 PM
I'm likely going to take the alt coins for the time being to use 100% toward hardware.
+1
Or/And for the ASIC project
Jump to: