Author

Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 165. (Read 1079974 times)

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
At the time of IPO, we were even further from the chips. If not the btct closing, I don't see anything worse now than the time of IPO except their poor PR communication.

If don't see anything worse now than at the time of the IPO you should probably try looking.  The company has failed to deliver on any of its claims.  Currently, there are two likely possibilities: 1) LC did actually receive their first batch of chips, their performance is about 10% of the rate LC advertised, and there are additional technical issues with the chips that prevent them from hashing steadily.  

2) LC is a total scam, rather than just a completely incompetent company.  

Yes, their first batch of chips did not work well. According to the irc chat of theSeven, however, the first batch was actually build by sneaking to the small university fab. It is possible the problem was caused by the poor product quality there. They are waiting for their second batch, and I guess they are still on the way.

So why don't they come here and say that? Why do they make us find TheSeven in an IRC chat?

Just remember making up all these things do not benefit them at all.
Currently, I think the share price and the emotion of the shareholders are the least important things for them to care about. Most likely, 1) they are busy in preparing the deploying the second batch. 2) they are still negotiating with Ukyo about the re-listing. Even 2) is not so important in current stage.

They only care about the hashing, since that's the only one brings them cash. However, it seems they can do nothing to improve their first-batch chips. All their hopes are now on the second batch.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
3) LC is completely incompetent scam

They raised 10K BTC didnt they? And we dont have a frigging idea who is really behind it. That would qualify as a successful scam to me.

Raised 7,000 bitcoin, they kept 3,000 bitcoin worth of shares for themselves.

They have made over 30,000 bitcoin by trading on their own news. One of the most successful scams in recent bitcoin history. Well played Labcoin, well played.

Proof?
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
According to the irc chat of theSeven, however, the first batch was actually build by sneaking to the small university fab. It is possible the problem was caused by the poor product quality there.

TheSeven's response: TheSeven   Duffer1: lol, people are misquoting me all the time
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
3) LC is completely incompetent scam

They raised 10K BTC didnt they? And we dont have a frigging idea who is really behind it. That would qualify as a successful scam to me.

Raised 7,000 bitcoin, they kept 3,000 bitcoin worth of shares for themselves.

They have made over 30,000 bitcoin by trading on their own news. One of the most successful scams in recent bitcoin history. Well played Labcoin, well played.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
3) LC is completely incompetent scam

They raised 10K BTC didnt they? And we dont have a frigging idea who is really behind it. That would qualify as a successful scam to me.

They raised 7K BTC, but that was for their 65nm chip.

They funded the 130nm chip.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
One thing is that they keep saying the 20TH will be online in the early October. I don't think lying about this does any good to them. Most likely they just have some problem in assembling and deploying.
hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 500
www.coinschedule.com
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
At the time of IPO, we were even further from the chips. If not the btct closing, I don't see anything worse now than the time of IPO except their poor PR communication.

If don't see anything worse now than at the time of the IPO you should probably try looking.  The company has failed to deliver on any of its claims.  Currently, there are two likely possibilities: 1) LC did actually receive their first batch of chips, their performance is about 10% of the rate LC advertised, and there are additional technical issues with the chips that prevent them from hashing steadily.  

2) LC is a total scam, rather than just a completely incompetent company.  

Yes, their first batch of chips did not work well. According to the irc chat of theSeven, however, the first batch was actually build by sneaking to the small university fab. It is possible the problem was caused by the poor product quality there. They are waiting for their second batch, and I guess they are still on the way.

So why don't they come here and say that? Why do they make us find TheSeven in an IRC chat?
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
3) LC is completely incompetent scam

They raised 10K BTC didnt they? And we dont have a frigging idea who is really behind it. That would qualify as a successful scam to me.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
At the time of IPO, we were even further from the chips. If not the btct closing, I don't see anything worse now than the time of IPO except their poor PR communication.

If don't see anything worse now than at the time of the IPO you should probably try looking.  The company has failed to deliver on any of its claims.  Currently, there are two likely possibilities: 1) LC did actually receive their first batch of chips, their performance is about 10% of the rate LC advertised, and there are additional technical issues with the chips that prevent them from hashing steadily.  

2) LC is a total scam, rather than just a completely incompetent company.  

Yes, their first batch of chips did not work well. According to the irc chat of theSeven, however, the first batch was actually build by sneaking to the small university fab. It is possible the problem was caused by the poor product quality there. They are waiting for their second batch, and I guess they are still on the way.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
At the time of IPO, we were even further from the chips. If not the btct closing, I don't see anything worse now than the time of IPO except their poor PR communication.

If don't see anything worse now than at the time of the IPO you should probably try looking.  The company has failed to deliver on any of its claims.  Currently, there are two likely possibilities: 1) LC did actually receive their first batch of chips, their performance is about 10% of the rate LC advertised, and there are additional technical issues with the chips that prevent them from hashing steadily.  

2) LC is a total scam, rather than just a completely incompetent company.  

3) LC is completely incompetent scam
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
At the time of IPO, we were even further from the chips. If not the btct closing, I don't see anything worse now than the time of IPO except their poor PR communication.

If don't see anything worse now than at the time of the IPO you should probably try looking.  The company has failed to deliver on any of its claims.  Currently, there are two likely possibilities: 1) LC did actually receive their first batch of chips, their performance is about 10% of the rate LC advertised, and there are additional technical issues with the chips that prevent them from hashing steadily.  

2) LC is a total scam, rather than just a completely incompetent company.  
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
We are hiring! If you are skilled in IC design / HDL optimization, shoot us your CV at [email protected]

Note: All images displayed may be subject to significant changes.

huehuehue.

That was there since July.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
We are hiring! If you are skilled in IC design / HDL optimization, shoot us your CV at [email protected]

Note: All images displayed may be subject to significant changes.

huehuehue.
legendary
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
I think .0001 is too low to ever happen. I would probably grab a million shares if it hit that low.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
At the time of IPO, we were even further from the chips. If not the btct closing, I don't see anything worse now than the time of IPO except their poor PR communication.
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
It would be logical, but at this point. I'm just offering to liquidate any investors (with 1000 shares only!) looking to leave BTC or just wanting to cash on what's left of their investment at a lower price. I could obviously go open a deal with someone on localbitcoins and shoot up some BTC just to buy whatever is left of this companies stock if I wanted to but that's not exactly the point right now.

I have explained the reason behind this offer several pages back but if you must, you can always go through my post history just to find it Smiley
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
If 0.0005 does not hold, we will see a free fall down to 0.0001 or even to the satoshi bids.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
Yes, what you said make sense. However, one thing is that this IPO has a company and a CEO, with his name listed.

And has anyone been in contact with him? I could make an IPO and list Bill Gates as chairman.

As for the current share price, I have to say, if anything its still rather high. Am I wrong saying it IPO'd at 0.001 and its now still about half of that?

If even labcoin is legit, its clear they will be unable to meet the expectations set forth at ipo. But the current price only makes sense to me if people still believe their chip not only exists, but will start hashing fairly soon with a relatively small risk  this is going absolutely nowhere. IOW, Im amazed its holding up so well and equally amazed how most of you seem to think this price is low. Facebook value dropped about as much after the IPO, no one thought FB was a scam.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
1.21 GIGA WATTS
Jump to: