Large Bitcoin Collider Thread 2.0 - page 5.

Thirdspace

hero member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 738

Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com

Quote from: anunnaki1202 on November 11, 2018, 05:11:35 PM

Quote from: snosj on September 06, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

- Today my equippement found key for 1CuSHEw7nerhLSwc4guXXdEvwLim58QnZ3. Big address!
- I checked but everything moved half hour after my LBC found it???

How moved out after half an hour?

interesting... because the corresponding address on BTX and BTG was moved the next day
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/05b580a46410bd373a8408dd3775abde66ce9833f753af28cdeeabaec6de028f
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btx/tx.dws?faaa97a275106c3e5857918a6c6babc6113b6044bad14151ab4b93c333fe0a7d.htm
https://btgexplorer.com/tx/58eb9f616650a26f0ed319062e4b61140ec155fde9f3722f6d7ce8947e36b475
https://btgexplorer.com/tx/883ed31fb5ca352059d2caf87653d76f34832702197dd3dba8414203b43a27ff
1CuSHEw7... = 2QvFEZpy... on BTX chain (airdropped 0.5 BTX for 1 BTC)

Quote from: snosj on September 07, 2018, 03:10:49 AM

It is different public key.
Is this first real collision?

if he found a private key of the same bitcoin address (P2PKH) but different public key,
would this private key work? as in to sign transaction of that utxo with different public key

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

Quote from: snosj on September 06, 2018, 07:42:50 AM

- Today my equippement found key for 1CuSHEw7nerhLSwc4guXXdEvwLim58QnZ3. Big address!
- I checked but everything moved half hour after my LBC found it???

So is a find or not a find?

How moved out after half an hour?

BurtW

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 1129

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.

Quote from: bartekjagoda on October 22, 2018, 12:55:29 PM

Quote from: Thirdspace on October 20, 2018, 08:14:38 AM

Quote from: BurtW on October 20, 2018, 01:19:58 AM

So, yes, it is still up and operating.

yes... but why still working on #55 of the puzzle?
both #55 (may 29) and #56 (sept 8 ) has been solved/found already
shouldn't the pool working on #57 now? 15c9mPGLku1HuW9LRtBf4jcHVpBUt8txKz - (Unspent) 0.057 BTC
is the project also targeting other public addresses (used or with balance) as well?

Is there a list of all found puzzles with keys?

See here:

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/trophies

and here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13381244

bartekjagoda

jr. member

Activity: 87

Merit: 5

Quote from: Thirdspace on October 20, 2018, 08:14:38 AM

Quote from: BurtW on October 20, 2018, 01:19:58 AM

So, yes, it is still up and operating.

yes... but why still working on #55 of the puzzle?
both #55 (may 29) and #56 (sept 8 ) has been solved/found already
shouldn't the pool working on #57 now? 15c9mPGLku1HuW9LRtBf4jcHVpBUt8txKz - (Unspent) 0.057 BTC
is the project also targeting other public addresses (used or with balance) as well?

Is there a list of all found puzzles with keys?

Elliptic23

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 3

Quote from: Severos on October 21, 2018, 09:09:33 PM

Is it possible to run LBC on an offline machine and update it manually every week for example?? I know there would be some useless work will be done due to other clients searching the same space before my offline machine does it.
If so, how would I do that??

There's a project where someone made an independent offline client. You can search any key range and address you want:

https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack

Severos

full member

Activity: 268

Merit: 119

Is it possible to run LBC on an offline machine and update it manually every week for example?? I know there would be some useless work will be done due to other clients searching the same space before my offline machine does it.
If so, how would I do that??

Thirdspace

hero member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 738

Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com

Quote from: BurtW on October 20, 2018, 01:19:58 AM

So, yes, it is still up and operating.

yes... but why still working on #55 of the puzzle?
both #55 (may 29) and #56 (sept 8 ) has been solved/found already
shouldn't the pool working on #57 now? 15c9mPGLku1HuW9LRtBf4jcHVpBUt8txKz - (Unspent) 0.057 BTC
is the project also targeting other public addresses (used or with balance) as well?

BurtW

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 1129

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.

Go here:

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/stats

As of the time I posted this they are generating and checking about 290 Mkeys/second for Bitcoins, or about 25.07 trillion keys per day.

So, yes, it is still up and operating.

fucilator_3000

member

Activity: 154

Merit: 27

I can't undestrand if this project is still alive or not...

Poloned

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 1

Does this still work? and is this program a private key sweeper?

Can anyone give me a video of it working?

rico666

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1037

฿ → ∞

Quote from: anunnaki1202 on September 07, 2018, 02:05:43 PM

Now that's a clever move rico666

who can decode that key

only you

Excuse me?

Don't be so ignorant - read the manual:
https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/man/user#found-

I also believe there are ready-made scripts to show you the private key in any format you are used to.

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

I think I have an idea what snosj is trying to do he maybe have them cards or even maybe is mining for bitcoin at the moment and is not so profitable for and wanting to switch to LBC

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

False alarm that address snosj posted is zero balance useless even if he has the key maybe watch only address wait trillions of trillions years to happen a transaction again

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

Now that's a clever move rico666

who can decode that key

only you

snosj do not have any privkey for that address he says he has .. because he needs to decompress the key what LBC find and he doesn't run LBC

rico666

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1037

฿ → ∞

By the way: the private key for https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1LzhS3k3e9Ub8i2W1V8xQFdB8n2MYCHPCa

is 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000006abe1f9b67e114

arulbero

legendary

Activity: 1914

Merit: 2071

Quote from: rico666 on September 07, 2018, 08:09:03 AM

Quote from: arulbero on September 07, 2018, 08:06:53 AM

If you look here you can see that who signed that transaction has used the public key 02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486.

You claim that you found a different public key, that means nobody has stolen your private key.

If all this proves to be true - we would look at a hash160 collision - yes?

Yes, we would have a (sha256 + ripemd160) collision. That's why I hope he will post his public key.

rico666

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1037

฿ → ∞

Quote from: arulbero on September 07, 2018, 08:06:53 AM

If you look here you can see that who signed that transaction has used the public key 02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486.

You claim that you found a different public key, that means nobody has stolen your private key.

If all this proves to be true - we would look at a hash160 collision - yes?

arulbero

legendary

Activity: 1914

Merit: 2071

Quote from: snosj on September 07, 2018, 03:10:49 AM

It is different public key.
Is this first real collision?

If you look here you can see that who signed that transaction has used the public key 02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486.

You claim that you found a different public key, that means nobody has stolen your private key.

rico666

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1037

฿ → ∞

Quote from: itod on September 07, 2018, 07:03:16 AM

Guys, there are no collisions. ... Until you have any kind of proof please do not use the "collision" word, you just make yourself look bad.

I believe the use of the word collision with a question mark after it is allowed - if you're kind enough to allow it sir.

Of course there are collisions we just have no definitive proof (2 different privkeys resulting in 1 pubkey).

Mathematically there must be collisions because you are not able to map a 2^256 bit space onto a 2^160bit space collision-free.
That is impossible and in this light your skepticism makes you look bad.

Because there must be - in fact - for every single public key around 2^96 private keys resolving in that public key.

All this results in 2^256 - 2^160 "superfluous" private keys and we "just" need to find one colliding pair.

Summary: There are collisions and everyone claiming otherwise simply doesn't understand the math behind this.
The legit question may be if/how to find these efficiently or if that is possible at all, but doesn't change the fact about their existence.

arulbero

legendary

Activity: 1914

Merit: 2071

Quote from: itod on September 07, 2018, 07:03:16 AM

Guys, there are no collisions. There never was, if there were Bitcoin would go to the ground. How long do you need to understand this fact?

There are about 2^96 different public keys for each address.

2^160 addresses times 2^96 public keys = 2^256 public keys.

Topic: Large Bitcoin Collider Thread 2.0 - page 5. (Read 57116 times)