Pages:
Author

Topic: Large Bitcoin Collider Thread 2.0 - page 5. (Read 57411 times)

copper member
Activity: 115
Merit: 4
November 24, 2018, 10:08:31 PM
Does anyone know how to set LBC to use GPUs?

james@research:~$ ./LBC --gpu --id x --secret y
GPU authorized: yes

Whenever I try to use -gopt dev=1 for example, it seems to use only CPUs.

I'm reading the manual and looking at the help, but I can't find anything that will let me make use of the GPUs.  It always says, "Will use 16 CPUs."

Thanks,
jr. member
Activity: 78
Merit: 1
November 12, 2018, 02:14:50 PM

 


I think you can run  LBC on any version of Linux and even on Windows Microsoft VM environment
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2077
November 12, 2018, 07:55:41 AM

interesting... because the corresponding address on BTX and BTG was moved the next day
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/05b580a46410bd373a8408dd3775abde66ce9833f753af28cdeeabaec6de028f
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btx/tx.dws?faaa97a275106c3e5857918a6c6babc6113b6044bad14151ab4b93c333fe0a7d.htm
https://btgexplorer.com/tx/58eb9f616650a26f0ed319062e4b61140ec155fde9f3722f6d7ce8947e36b475
https://btgexplorer.com/tx/883ed31fb5ca352059d2caf87653d76f34832702197dd3dba8414203b43a27ff
1CuSHEw7... = 2QvFEZpy... on BTX chain (airdropped 0.5 BTX for 1 BTC)


if he found a private key of the same bitcoin address (P2PKH) but different public key,
would this private key work? as in to sign transaction of that utxo with different public key

Yes, it would work. But in this case I see always the same public key (then the same private key):

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/05b580a46410bd373a8408dd3775abde66ce9833f753af28cdeeabaec6de028f
02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btx/tx.dws?faaa97a275106c3e5857918a6c6babc6113b6044bad14151ab4b93c333fe0a7d.htm
02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 738
Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com
November 12, 2018, 12:06:57 AM
- Today my equippement found key for 1CuSHEw7nerhLSwc4guXXdEvwLim58QnZ3. Big address!
- I checked but everything moved half hour after my LBC found it???
How moved out after half an hour?
interesting... because the corresponding address on BTX and BTG was moved the next day
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/05b580a46410bd373a8408dd3775abde66ce9833f753af28cdeeabaec6de028f
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btx/tx.dws?faaa97a275106c3e5857918a6c6babc6113b6044bad14151ab4b93c333fe0a7d.htm
https://btgexplorer.com/tx/58eb9f616650a26f0ed319062e4b61140ec155fde9f3722f6d7ce8947e36b475
https://btgexplorer.com/tx/883ed31fb5ca352059d2caf87653d76f34832702197dd3dba8414203b43a27ff
1CuSHEw7... = 2QvFEZpy... on BTX chain (airdropped 0.5 BTX for 1 BTC)

It is different public key.
Is this  first real collision?
if he found a private key of the same bitcoin address (P2PKH) but different public key,
would this private key work? as in to sign transaction of that utxo with different public key
jr. member
Activity: 78
Merit: 1
November 11, 2018, 04:11:35 PM

- Today my equippement found key for 1CuSHEw7nerhLSwc4guXXdEvwLim58QnZ3. Big address!
- I checked but everything moved half hour after my LBC found it???
 


So is a find or not a find?

How moved out after half an hour?
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
October 22, 2018, 05:26:55 PM
So, yes, it is still up and operating.
yes... but why still working on #55 of the puzzle?
both #55 (may 29) and #56 (sept 8 ) has been solved/found already
shouldn't the pool working on #57 now? 15c9mPGLku1HuW9LRtBf4jcHVpBUt8txKz - (Unspent) 0.057 BTC
is the project also targeting other public addresses (used or with balance) as well?

Is there a list of all found puzzles with keys?

See here:

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/trophies

and here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13381244
jr. member
Activity: 87
Merit: 5
October 22, 2018, 11:55:29 AM
So, yes, it is still up and operating.
yes... but why still working on #55 of the puzzle?
both #55 (may 29) and #56 (sept 8 ) has been solved/found already
shouldn't the pool working on #57 now? 15c9mPGLku1HuW9LRtBf4jcHVpBUt8txKz - (Unspent) 0.057 BTC
is the project also targeting other public addresses (used or with balance) as well?

Is there a list of all found puzzles with keys?
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 3
October 22, 2018, 08:42:38 AM
Is it possible to run LBC on an offline machine and update it manually every week for example?? I know there would be some useless work will be done due to other clients searching the same space before my offline machine does it.
If so, how would I do that??

There's a project where someone made an independent offline client. You can search any key range and address you want:

https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack
full member
Activity: 268
Merit: 119
October 21, 2018, 08:09:33 PM
Is it possible to run LBC on an offline machine and update it manually every week for example?? I know there would be some useless work will be done due to other clients searching the same space before my offline machine does it.
If so, how would I do that??
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 738
Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com
October 20, 2018, 07:14:38 AM
So, yes, it is still up and operating.
yes... but why still working on #55 of the puzzle?
both #55 (may 29) and #56 (sept 8 ) has been solved/found already
shouldn't the pool working on #57 now? 15c9mPGLku1HuW9LRtBf4jcHVpBUt8txKz - (Unspent) 0.057 BTC
is the project also targeting other public addresses (used or with balance) as well?
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
October 20, 2018, 12:19:58 AM
Go here:

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/stats

As of the time I posted this they are generating and checking about 290 Mkeys/second for Bitcoins, or about 25.07 trillion keys per day.

So, yes, it is still up and operating.
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 27
October 19, 2018, 07:56:14 AM
I can't undestrand if this project is still alive or not...

jr. member
Activity: 66
Merit: 1
October 18, 2018, 08:24:42 PM
Does this still work? and is this program a private key sweeper?

Can anyone give me a video of it working?
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1037
฿ → ∞
September 07, 2018, 11:12:58 PM
Now that's a clever move rico666 Smiley who can decode that key Smiley only you

Excuse me?

Don't be so ignorant - read the manual:
https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/man/user#found-

I also believe there are ready-made scripts to show you the private key in any format you are used to.
jr. member
Activity: 78
Merit: 1
September 07, 2018, 03:03:44 PM
I think I have an idea what snosj is trying to do he maybe have them cards or even maybe is mining for bitcoin at the moment and is not so profitable for and wanting to switch to LBC
jr. member
Activity: 78
Merit: 1
September 07, 2018, 01:52:37 PM
False alarm that address snosj posted is zero balance useless even if he has the key maybe watch only address wait trillions of trillions years to happen a transaction again
jr. member
Activity: 78
Merit: 1
September 07, 2018, 01:05:43 PM
Now that's a clever move rico666 Smiley who can decode that key Smiley only you

 snosj do not have any privkey for that address he says he has .. because he needs to decompress the key what LBC find and he doesn't run LBC 


legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1037
฿ → ∞
September 07, 2018, 07:14:02 AM
By the way: the private key for https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1LzhS3k3e9Ub8i2W1V8xQFdB8n2MYCHPCa

is 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000006abe1f9b67e114

legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2077
September 07, 2018, 07:13:03 AM
If you look here you can see that who signed that transaction has used the public key 02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486.

You claim that you found a different public key, that means nobody has stolen your private key.

If all this proves to be true - we would look at a hash160 collision - yes?

Yes, we would have a (sha256 + ripemd160) collision. That's why I hope he will post his public key.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1037
฿ → ∞
September 07, 2018, 07:09:03 AM
If you look here you can see that who signed that transaction has used the public key 02b009e153bd0df7fd2856ffbcbb71020bd69fbea49b20f7cd0b40e0ae98ff2486.

You claim that you found a different public key, that means nobody has stolen your private key.

If all this proves to be true - we would look at a hash160 collision - yes?
Pages:
Jump to: