But they simply dont wanna do math thats all so i help a bit.
-snip-
Thanks. You did indeed help.
People think the 1400 BTC in Escrow are not high enough and that lauda stole from the altcoin funds,
Which is nonsensical because I never had access to the other altcoins (exc. used to have for DOGE; now locked on bittrex).
All the alt coins were converted to BTC last year after the ICO...total investment was 3055 BTC per a post from Lauda.
Which is nonsense that I have never said. Unfortunately, they were not all liquidated instantly (had they been, there would be more money to repay).
The Post from Lauda back than was only the conversion rates so everybody could calculate how much nvst he will get it never states that they directly convert the alts to btc
and they didnt convert them.
Here comes the merit party.
It wouldn't make sense for the escrow to keep (or ignore) the BCH after the refunds are issued and the escrow wallet is no longer used.
Disagreed, as I always have on the fork debate (especially in cases where ToS/policies covers this beforehand). Although discussing the principles of forking would be swaying away from this accusation. The real problem (documentation-wise) is the exchange account. This thread is just a joke, i.e. a distraction by some of the involved parties (in order to delay exchange access, vote, refund).
Even though the funds that are on it aren't significant in comparison (mostly part of what was last released to nemgun), they should be pooled back and having access restored would enable us to build a proper chain of events (with little to no vagueness). That said, nemgun keeps delaying this with various excuses. Today is the final day.
