copying doesn't amount to plagiarism when you are not passing it off as your own
That's literally exactly what I said.
did I say anything about copying from wikipedia and passing it off as his own
did I say that he should do that ?
Your questions are annoying, because they don't get us anywhere.
Yes, in a thread about ways to earn merit you suggested that a reliable way to achieve merit was through copying from wikipedia; you failed to say anything about sourcing it, or passing it off as your own. This would imply there is nothing else to do, other than copy it from wikipedia. If you omit this, then it is plagiarism and you have said nothing about sourcing or giving credit to the original author. If you're now saying this, then it sounds like we agree and there's no reason to carry on as if we do not.
Again, I am attempting to improve your statements, premises and conclusions so that they are more beneficial to the newbies seeking this information and truthful to reality.
that is what people here doing and that what earn them Merit as they go along participating in the discussion, whether or not the forum accept it thats for the forum to catch them
Who is doing this? Point them out.
There are two options here, either you are aware of active specific instances of abuse and are quietly watching it happen making you complicit, or you are unaware of any active specific instance of abuse making your claim baseless. Either way, it doesn't look good for you, but I am pretty curious; which is it? You cannot just claim that this is what people are doing if you have no proof, so let's see it. If you can point these people out they will be banned. The forum doesn't accept it, and you're well aware of that at this point. In a thread where the discussion is about ways for lower ranking members to earn merit, why would you even suggest this as a feasible strategy without overtly warning against it?
hold your horse there accusing me this and that without understanding what I am saying and then create your own version of my intent
Your sentences are hard to follow. I'm doing my best to understand what you have said, clarify it, improve upon it and make it a more laudable response to the original question.