Topic: LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusion - page 11. (Read 5768 times)

For the same reason why livecoin didn't let izoomrud to withdraw his coins. (yes again with that livecoin shit)

I don't get this angle "why would a big company like this would ruin themselves for pennies?"

THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME!

My name was mentioned in the OP so I decided to make a post here:

- I did not receive a PM from LFC_Bitcoin about this subject
- I did not receive payment from Sportsbet



hacker1001101001 is a pathetic troll who just cannot help but poke his head inside threads to create division but refuses to post in the thread that exposed his multi-accounts to answer questions put to him: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54743154



You rightly pointed out just going after LFC_Bitcoin on the basis of alleged PMs is proof there is no solid case against him. When there is a whole thread about supporting/opposing flags why would alleged sending of PMs make this even be considered an issue?: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/request-support-or-opposition-for-flags-here-5153445



I agree with you there does seem to be more to this than meets the eye and the amount being contested is tiny. As LFC_Bitcoin mentioned in an earlier post, why would a company turning over multi-million USD$ per year scam a user over such a tiny amount? 

We just thought you look too clean so decided to sling some mud your way.

What did I do

I know people won't care because I don't have hero member badge but changing your trust settings just after someone supports a company that directly pays you, reflects wrong behavior and one should not be in DT1 if they are so biased towards a particular sportsbook.

I didn't check this account's registration date before. (side chain) It has quite a history it seems. Looks like It was a shitty one too.

I am not interested in what LFC did with PM's in this thread. So far I didn't see anything enough to distrust him but I surely didn't like him to side with the casino immediately neither. (without listening to the both sides of the story) That is not how a DT member should act. That's all I have to say about him.

Maybe it was "sarcasm". Like lying about reasons for sockpuppeting:




How dare we not trust lying noobtrolls.

Interesting. Somehow I thought it as a + entry immediately. You do have a point. Then what's the point of saying this line, fu side_chain. Distrusting you now. I thought It was going to be fun.

You violated a written! contract. You promised us a fun game.

The backstabbing coward didn't say that both I and LFC_Bitcoin trust him/her/it. More likely it's one of the ~ entries, or just a lie to begin with.

How about a game?


Who is this backstabbing coward?   Since I can't really pick a guess someone from that list, I'll go with CH too. Or is this I dunno, DarkStar?

LoyceV is pretty sneaky and suspicious too. With all that Switzerland Imma neutral thick skin shiet.

I can't believe this thread has gotten so much attention.  It's nothing but an obvious attempt at trolling DT members who disagree with you.  If you were at all confident in your position then you would have posted all this drudge from your main account.  Which brings up the question; who's the real "sell-out?"  The member who calls balls and strikes like he sees them, from his main account, or the cowardly member who refuses to address controversial issues with his main account to prevent being "black-listed" by other campaign managers?

In all honesty, until you called me out and I went to check the spreadsheet, I wasn't even sure that I was still on Sportsbet.io's payroll.  I sent a PM to the campaign manager on May 9th informing him that I would likely be too busy to comply with the minimum post requirement for that week, and possibly subsequent weeks.  I also told him that if he felt I was no longer supporting the campaign as needed, to feel free removing me.

Now back to the subject at hand; how many shit-stirring newbies do get on this forum compared to honest, long-standing, legitimate businesses?  How much support has the forum and the bitcoin community received from these newbies compared to this specific legitimate business?  Sportsbet.io has exposed the bitcoin logo to millions of Soccer fans, they didn't have to do that, they could just as easily had their own logo on Watford's sleeves.  All anyone has to do is spend just a few days following their official thread to know what kind of people they are.  They care about this community, they care about bitcoin, and they obviously care about their customers.  I say this as someone who doesn't gamble, and generally speaking I have no love for casinos as a whole.  

As for the accuser, I'm convinced he's a liar.  The way he constructs his sentences and the use of certain phrases that are only common to native English speakers make it very hard for me to believe he's using a translator (like he claims.)  So yeah, I think he's full of shit.

I'm astonished at the reasoning of a few members in this particular case.  On one hand we have the word of a well established business with a long history and reputation of supporting our community, while on the other hand we have the word of a shady newbie, insisting he be compensated more than he deposited.  Is it really that hard to understand why I would choose to side with sportsbet.io in this situation?

I do acknowledge that the question remains; why isn't sportsbet.io divulging more information about the detection and suspicion of the accuser's cheating?  I don't know, but I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt and surmise they have a good reason.  Not because I'm wearing their signature, because they've earned it.  As others have noted Bitcasino.io recently had a similar accusation and provided information to the community, so it only stands to reason that their sister company has similar methods of detecting cheaters.  But that's not to say it's the only method of detection, or that the cheaters were using the same methods to defraud the system.  Maybe there is more to the story, maybe one of their methods is insufficient and only partially effective, and this user found a way to navigate around it.  Divulging their detection method for this situation may inadvertently expose a vulnerability that they want to fix before they provide more information.  That seems like enough speculation, I'm sure you get the point.

Just offering to show you that "[t]hey will easily say it to me but not you and other reputed users" is likely false - on the off chance that you are indeed a normal person for some inexplicable reason pretending to be a disgruntled troll. But I guess not. Carry on with your quest.

I do not see how this is connected with asking LFC_bitcoin to publish his PM. Give me a solid reason please.

I already gave my explanation of taking this path of staying anonymous.

You are into testing me, how about I give you some clue?
1. I am one of the user who is common in your and LFC_bitcoin's trust list. Test starts now.
2. I am not CH that you are thinking

It's a statement of fact.

Let me offer you a deal. PM me from your real account. If you're not a shit-stirring troll that I think you are, I'll ask LFC_Bitcoin to publish his PM. He'll probably tell me to fuck off but I'll make an honest good faith effort on your behalf. Let's put your fat ego bullshit to test.

Nothing here to make conversation. It is when they become reputed they think the community owe them. Don't you see how you, LFC are treating me with your offensive words? I apologize for using big ass words.

You easily made this justification but don't find anything wrong with LFC_bitcoin even with the evidences. post 1 post 2

Everything is looking fine in your judgement because LFC_bitcoin is a reputed member and this is an account with no history even when references are attached against LFC_bitcoins recent activities. You can simply ask him and BitcoinGirl to be transparent without making this conversation any longer. Buy you won't because you feel an alt account is demanding you. This proves the Ego you built up over the years and perhaps you consider the community owe you.

Fine, I will ask LFC_bitcoin and BitcoinGirl.

I wanted to PM LFC_bitcoin but I get this message
https://prnt.sc/tphhl5

So this was the message

I hope LFC_bitcoin address this.

Now my try for BitcoinGirl.

So which is it? Reputed or fat with ego? See that's the peril of using a sockpuppet account. You can't have it both ways. Stop pretending like you're being discriminated against if you're unable to stand behind your words and actions.


No, actually that would apply even if LoyceV demanded to publish that PM.

I see no reason for that since there is no aggrieved party in that PM exchange and you have clearly shown that you have a grudge against LFC_Bitcoin.

They will easily say it to me but not you and other reputed users.

This is the problem with this community. Ego!
When accounts are established they think community owe them and is correct whatever they say. They become so fat with Ego that when a low rank account wants to justify anything they simply hammer them with their big ass.


Why would you think so? Because this is a low value account?

The trust and flag system is meant to be political and is political in nature. I would expect PMs to be sent to lobby support or opposition to flags. I think anyone complaining about a person sending PMs trying to lobby support is trying to gin up trouble.

I still have concerns about various conflicts of interest, but that someone send a personal message does nothing to change my stance.

You can ask and you can be told to fuck right off... how is it any of your business? If BitcoinGirl considers the message to be offensive or otherwise inappropriate they can complain to admins, or complain publicly or reply to LFC's PM accordingly or whatever they choose to do. Some random troll demanding to see someone's PM to spin it into something incriminating is quite pathetic.


Same here. Why? What are you after?

I do not know if LFC is trying to censor anything in here but moves coming from LFC and the other facts are not very good to believe that he said to take a look. He defiantly said to Oppose the flag and said it to some selective friends and dealt in private.

If LFC and some other reputed members are not giving me any value of my words then why Bitcoingirl.club will? May be some of your reputed members can request both LFC and Bitcoingirl.club to share the exact messages.