Who is the real user behind this alt-account? Does anybody have any ideas?
- all DT opposition is receiving payment from SB. I'm not saying, receiving SP doesn't allow you to have an opinion, but 100% is alarming.
If we're talking about the flag - that's not true, unless you know
something I don't.
rdbase has a bustadice signature and El duderino_ doesn't have a paid signature.May be because of my alt account you are not taking my posts in account and missing information. I hope I posted it from my main account but sorry I have my reasons to have this alt account anonymous.
>
rdbase is a heavy shill of sportsbet.io
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sportsbetio-betting-discussion-thread-rev-5208617, Wall Observer friend of LFC_Bitcoin most possibly received a PM to oppose the flag
>
El duderino_ is very close Wall Observer friend of LFC_Bitcoin opposed the flag right after receiving the PM from his friend.
>There is
another one who supported but then removed the flag. He is also very close friend to LFC_Bitcoin. Proof will be given if necessary.
In Wall Observer
LFC_Bitcoin,
El duderino_ are very close friends.
Here you will find
the other guy - BitcoinGirl, in the post he confessed that he received PM and the edited post (cut off part) clearly had LFC_bitcoin asking to oppose the flag. efialtis has screenshot available.
Look up post history of
rdbase and see some of his posts. LFC_bitcoin knows he is a benefit seeker from sportsbet.io. See the thread he manages for sportsbet.io although they do not pay him. Plus rdbase is also fairly close to LFC_bitcoin in Wall Observer.
So El duderino_ does not have a paid signature but good guy can not deny the request from his friend.
rdbase saw an opportunity to gain some trust and accepted the bait from LFC_bitcoin and it worked.
https://bpip.org/TrustLogThe other guy possibly could not connected his reasonings with LFC_bitcoin although they are good friends so he wanted to stay neutral but made the mistake of mentioning his friends in his innocent post.
DireWolfM14 may have some sense of humor but possibly he is sold because of the weekly payment he receives from SB so he really needed to save his ass by opposing the flag. Plus, this is very much possible that LFC_bitcoin sent him PM to support sportsbet.io
The rest other guys are clearly no way weight any value, they are fake users and not bringing any value to the forum except milking from signature campaign of sportsbet.io and bitcasino (both are same company), check their post history if you do not believe me. It was not very hard for LFC_bitcoin to convince them to oppose the flag by the PM he sent to them.
Ask LFC_bitcoin about how many PMs he sent to oppose the flag although I doubt he will tell you the truth.
I would have had no problem in supporting a type 2 flag.
May be the victim guy made mistake by creating type 3. One could suggest him to create flag 2. This way we do not see members are arguing with the wording of a flag instead of supporting or opposing it. First time I saw a clear mention of correct flag type.
I edited the thread title to
LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusionThe bribing is a very silent work he is doing. Oppose the flag, the user finds his inclusion, speaks against sportsbet.io case, the user finds his distrust.
He also send a counter positive feedback which he deleted later to support his sportsbet.io employers.
LFC_Bitcoin is manipulating others with his PMs and DT position. Is this only for 0.018 BTC a week?
I would like Suchmoon, LoyceV, Lauda, Jollygood, hilariousandco, The Pharmacist, Avirunes, owlcatz, Lutpin, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, teeGUMES, o_e_l_e_o, TheBeardedBaby, coinlocket$, asche, Coolcryptovator, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, TalkStar, YOSHIE, Yahoo, Little Mouse, Steamtyme, logfiles, ScamViruS, big_daddy, bL4nkcode, lovesmayfamilis, cryptoaddictchie, witcher_sense, notblox1, Alex_Sr and all those good forum users to look at the case we have here.
I wish marlboroza was online.
(Edited)
