I don't know shet about BAMT, but from what I see on the install instructions you need a special iso image loader and also need to add special libraries and stuff to your windows machine, that is just not "easy" for your average windows user.
Um the special loader is a GUI app that you click on thumb drive, select image and hit the ultra complicated WRITE button.
As far as special libraries and stuff for windows I don't have a clue what you are talking about (and neither do you). You don't need anything except:
a) idiot proof image writer (has all of 4 buttons)
b) img file which is written to the usb drive.
c) $5 thumbdrive 2GB or more.
I will assure all of you though this thing is NEVER going mainstream unless you make it easy for people with basic computer backgrounds to use, mine and exchange bitcoins in a windows or apple environment without special tweaks, codes or files.
Why would mining go mainstream? Over time efficiencies will force marginal miners (in terms of skill, electrical power, access to capital, and most efficient hardware) out. It is no different than any other commodity based business. Mining will become more and more specialized not less specialized.
I am not an idiot and have built plenty of machines from basic office to over-clocked water-cooled systems. I own three businesses and am halfway through an MBA. If this is driving me insane you can bet that 99% of the population doesn't stand a chance.
99% of the population shouldn't ever mine. 99% of population can't configure a webserver but that doesn't mean they can't use facebook. 99% of population can't build a credit card processing terminal from scratch but doesn't mean they can't "charge it". Within a couple years FPGAs will make GPU obsolete. Within a few years after that even an FPGA will be insufficient as everyone will have one. You will need low cost power, cool temps, and latest generation FPGA. The network will always strive for more and more efficient systems.
If bitcoin gets back into the $20-$30 range the network will be hacked because there will be too much money involved for it to NOT entice someone to do so. If you don't think there are botnet people out there who control millions of machines plus have access to large amounts of gpu hashing power, you are naive. $200 million dollars is enough to entice most people to do anything, especially those with bad intentions.
Even if that were true the network doesn't need YOU to mine. If there is profit those who can will mine. If it is profitable for profitable miners to deploy another TH/s or 20 TH/s they will and if it isn't profitable then "ease of use" isn't going to magically make profits out of losses.
Also what makes you think botnets are bad for the network and most botnet zombies don't have high end GPUs. As FPGA force GPUs out botnets will become even more marginal.
This network needs at least twice as many tera hash to survive.
LOLZ. The network could be half as large and be more than strong enough given the level of economic activity.
We also need more comprehensive databases to show complete hardware set-ups and their compatibility with specific mining clients/OS systems .
Mining is a zero sum game. The network is 9TH/s right now because current economics support 9TH/s. Making it easier for noobs won't make the network stronger, it will just push out other miners.