Author

Topic: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware - page 185. (Read 423279 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001

Then just use http://bitcoindifficulty.com/ w/ history of percentage difficulty increase and plug into calc.


That's what I already do, but who knows what the difficulty is really going to do once all these ASICs get on the network (plus all the backup hash that ASICminer et al. are keeping from us at the moment.

I also use https://bitclockers.com/calc which gives a better ROI estimate. Anyone got any other calcs they use?

I use this calc  http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator      & these "estimates" of difficulty @ corresponding network hashrates,have fun!!!

19707600=150TH

26276800=200TH

39415200=300TH

52553600=400TH

65692000=500TH

78830400=600TH

98538000=750TH

Just copy & paste into the diff box  Wink
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
So worst case scenario is that every 12 months a ghz will earn you .05 BTC?

Is it unreasonable to think a ghz could mine 5 BTC in 12 months?


You could work it out yourself using this...

http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator

There's probably better calculators out there, but this is an easy one to use  Smiley Of course you still need a crystal ball to know what the difficulty is going to be!

Then just use http://bitcoindifficulty.com/ w/ history of percentage difficulty increase and plug into calc.



Very interesting links, thanks. Although I admit that I'm having trouble projecting difficulty increase by studying the chart on http://bitcoindifficulty.com/   :/

there are plenty of bitcoin resources,  allchains.info, coinwarz.com etc etc  google search for bitcoin difficulty history and you can get some numbers
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Think. Positive. Thoughts.
As an aside: Each person should do their own research and calculations to decide if purchasing miners is right for them. That being said, the numbers I have run are based on a very aggressive difficulty ramp up, and show the units will be unprofitable after 9-10 months. That being said, in order to maintain the exponential increase in difficulty, $26 million dollars worth of hardware would need to be introduced in month 3, $54 million in month 5, $110 million in month 7, and so on. This assumes .5btc per gh/s, and there are companies slated to produce miners at a .2.

I think you may want to adjust that estimate. Recently announced projects are claiming way better than .5btc per gh/s.

Bitfury, 20btc for 120 gh/s = .167btc per gh/s
KNCMiner, 60btc for 350 gh/s = .17btc per gh/s

The likelihood that one or both miss targets, are delayed,  or turn out to be a scam/failed business is pretty high.

Steamboat,  could you speak to the logistics once chips arrive? I assume you separate the chips-only orders and ship them immediately, but what about when you receive the assembled boards? Do you then ship the board assembly-only orders? Then the kits? Then fully assembled? Or are you keeping with the FIFO queue between all boqrds that require assembly? Where do hosted units fit in?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
So worst case scenario is that every 12 months a ghz will earn you .05 BTC?

Is it unreasonable to think a ghz could mine 5 BTC in 12 months?


You could work it out yourself using this...

http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator

There's probably better calculators out there, but this is an easy one to use  Smiley Of course you still need a crystal ball to know what the difficulty is going to be!

Then just use http://bitcoindifficulty.com/ w/ history of percentage difficulty increase and plug into calc.


Very interesting links, thanks. Although I admit that I'm having trouble projecting difficulty increase by studying the chart on http://bitcoindifficulty.com/   :/
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
As an aside: Each person should do their own research and calculations to decide if purchasing miners is right for them. That being said, the numbers I have run are based on a very aggressive difficulty ramp up, and show the units will be unprofitable after 9-10 months. That being said, in order to maintain the exponential increase in difficulty, $26 million dollars worth of hardware would need to be introduced in month 3, $54 million in month 5, $110 million in month 7, and so on. This assumes .5btc per gh/s, and there are companies slated to produce miners at a .2.

I think you may want to adjust that estimate. Recently announced projects are claiming way better than .5btc per gh/s.

Bitfury, 20btc for 120 gh/s = .167btc per gh/s
KNCMiner, 60btc for 350 gh/s = .17btc per gh/s
sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
I've been assuming a 50% increase per month for up to one year. With beginning difficulty between 25 and 40mil.
50% increase continuing for a full year? That seems unrealistic. Assuming a starting point of around 500 Th/s, that would put total has of network at 50+ Ph/s 12 months later. Even at an ASIC generation 2 price of say 0.10 BTC per Gh/s that is $500 million cost just for the miners. The only way that could happen would be for the exchange rate to have some extraordinary growth. Could happen I guess, in which case I won't care that my mining hardware investment didn't get a ROI.
sr. member
Activity: 457
Merit: 250
I've been assuming a 50% increase per month for up to one year. With beginning difficulty between 25 and 40mil.
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Thinking between 45m and 90m mid/late august and upto 200m by year end sound conservative enough? Or is it possible we will be seeing even 400-600m by year end?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Then just use http://bitcoindifficulty.com/ w/ history of percentage difficulty increase and plug into calc.


That's what I already do, but who knows what the difficulty is really going to do once all these ASICs get on the network (plus all the backup hash that ASICminer et al. are keeping from us at the moment.

I also use https://bitclockers.com/calc which gives a better ROI estimate. Anyone got any other calcs they use?
considering the difficulty is going up almost exponentially I think it may be best to expect the worst :/
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Well I really think its too late to participate in the "gold rush" once things level off and maybe next gen chips are introduced a good ROI can be calculated.

Also, I think as these come to market, many GPUs will be retired, removing some of the hashrate from the network.  Kind of a trade up sort of thing.  I know that once I get these ASICs, my GPU rig is being sold off in parts.

I don't think that will matter much. There is probably between 1000T and 1500T coming. Removing even the whole actual 100T won't make much of a difference. If the ASIC deployment is progressive, sure it will have a bigger impact, but it looks like it will come in waves.

Agreed. 
KS
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Well I really think its too late to participate in the "gold rush" once things level off and maybe next gen chips are introduced a good ROI can be calculated.

Also, I think as these come to market, many GPUs will be retired, removing some of the hashrate from the network.  Kind of a trade up sort of thing.  I know that once I get these ASICs, my GPU rig is being sold off in parts.

I don't think that will matter much. There is probably between 1000T and 1500T coming. Removing even the whole actual 100T won't make much of a difference. If the ASIC deployment is progressive, sure it will have a bigger impact, but it looks like it will come in waves.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Well I really think its too late to participate in the "gold rush" once things level off and maybe next gen chips are introduced a good ROI can be calculated.

Also, I think as these come to market, many GPUs will be retired, removing some of the hashrate from the network.  Kind of a trade up sort of thing.  I know that once I get these ASICs, my GPU rig is being sold off in parts.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10

Then just use http://bitcoindifficulty.com/ w/ history of percentage difficulty increase and plug into calc.


That's what I already do, but who knows what the difficulty is really going to do once all these ASICs get on the network (plus all the backup hash that ASICminer et al. are keeping from us at the moment.

I also use https://bitclockers.com/calc which gives a better ROI estimate. Anyone got any other calcs they use?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
So worst case scenario is that every 12 months a ghz will earn you .05 BTC?

Is it unreasonable to think a ghz could mine 5 BTC in 12 months?


You could work it out yourself using this...

http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator

There's probably better calculators out there, but this is an easy one to use  Smiley Of course you still need a crystal ball to know what the difficulty is going to be!

Then just use http://bitcoindifficulty.com/ w/ history of percentage difficulty increase and plug into calc.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Well I really think its too late to participate in the "gold rush" once things level off and maybe next gen chips are introduced a good ROI can be calculated.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
So worst case scenario is that every 12 months a ghz will earn you .05 BTC?

Is it unreasonable to think a ghz could mine 5 BTC in 12 months?


You could work it out yourself using this...

http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator

There's probably better calculators out there, but this is an easy one to use  Smiley Of course you still need a crystal ball to know what the difficulty is going to be!
MZD
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 100
So worst case scenario is that every 12 months a ghz will earn you .05 BTC?

Is it unreasonable to think a ghz could mine 5 BTC in 12 months?


full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
poor gpus Sad
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
Yes. Each K16 with the DIY kit option and up will come with the parts necessary to stack.

 This is awesome to hear ! Was just trying to figure out the physical logistics of where to organize 18 K16's.

 I would guess the fully assembled and tested units will also ship with parts necessary to stack as well ?

 Cheers !
vs3
hero member
Activity: 622
Merit: 500
is there enough demand for batch #6?

Looking up that address shows that exactly 80 chips have been paid so far. So (since #6 was announced 2 days ago) it does appear to be moving at a slightly slower pace than previous batches. On the other hand - that's probably normal as this is the first half (5k) and chips have not yet been purchased. I've noticed that once we get into the second half (where chips have been ordered already) the demand picks up as people try to get into the batch.
Jump to: