Topic: List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign - page 24. (Read 32248 times)

Dude, something wrong with your screenshot. Maybe this is what "sent to" means Yahoo's incoming message. Not good.

World Record in Burst posting.

21 Posts in 5 mins only.


Start: 05:21:56 AM
End:  05:26:13 AM

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/altcoinauthority-227359

manager scam

first banned and then sells accounts

Sir, I just want to remind you that mixers are usually used by people with a gambling or drug addiction or for criminal purposes. If your campaign has good prices, it does not make her money less "dirty". True cryptans use Monero to ensure anonymity, and do not try to turn bitcoins into mincemeat through a mixer. Therefore, please moderate your ardor in matters of reputation (or remove your signature). Thanks.

Update: Sorry, I think I distorted the picture of what is happening and this research shows that the proportion of illegal bitcoins at the entrance to the mixers is actually not that large, and people often use mixers to ensure privacy. Thanks to the TryNinja for the link provided. I will try to better check the sources of my information for relevance.

It seems like there is something strange or suspicious about this account: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jacafbiz-888323

If there is free time, maybe you can visit here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43968933

Maybe he deserves to be paid from yobit or vice versa.
get his name on the retirement list.

I can understand why it feels so, because the fact that all the previously non-managed Yobit campaigns had huge amounts of shitposts and a lot of burstposting when even this term "burst-post" was not introduced. But I trust Yahoo and his work behind keeping the forum as clean as it used to be, since his involvement has already nuked the ways from which these shitposters were trying to make money for nothing - by nothing I mean that their posts had no genuine efforts involved.


I don't think this makes any sense because if someone is given a warning, breaks it and gets removed and then improves their overall performance during the meantime, there remains no reason for Yahoo or any other managers to make this campaign those participants' last ever campaign joined as Yahoo himself committed that more than half (and according to me, more than 95%) users here are just to make money. All they need is some real content with their taste that would show that they posted with the intent of helping while that topic also brought some interest to them based on their understanding of the subject they post about.


Negative feedback? Never.
Spamming is not scamming '*I read this somewhere'
So nobody should be negged for spamming but a neutral indicating/mentioning their burstposting/spamming habits will be fine. AFAIK, trust system is about trades and this behavior has nothing to do with trading so negative ratings are a 'NO' from my side, rest decision remains in the manager's hands. He's greatly taking care of the campaign as well as the forum.

Blacklists from other Yahoo campaigns and negative feedback for what if I can ask?

I decided to participate in this campaign, mainly because Yahoo started working as a quality checker - "manager". Additionally, I always posted a lot (even without any signature) and very often, I literally stopped myself from publishing even more. Of course, after recent problems with the Livecoin campaign, in which I participated, before I decided to apply to this campaign, I checked everything very carefully.

First of all, we don't advertise the Yobit exchange, only the Cryptotalk.org forum. There is no visible link between Yobit exchange and Cryptotalk.org forum. There is no trace or reference to the Yobit exchange in the signature. What's more, the Cryptotalk.org forum itself has no visible connection with the Yobit exchange, no advertising, special section dedicated to Yobit or even a single link on the first page to Yobit exchange.



In fact, if someone does not know that Cryptotalk.org belongs to Yobit, then even when reading the forum and being active, it is hard to guess that there is any link between these two instances.
So far, Yobit is doing nothing that could indicate that infact they want to advertise the exchange through this campaign, not the forum itself.


I do not understand why Yahoo would do it in particular when it comes to participants who do not break any rules?

Of course, the decision belongs to Yahoo, but as I mentioned earlier, I decided to participate in this campaign primarily because of Yahoo involvement, which guaranteed good quality control and relative safety. I would be very surprised and it is really hard to believe that there is a possibility that I would be banned from all his campaigns, for that reason.


Let me ask you one more time: but why, for what this negative feedback? Of course, I want to remind that I am talking about decent participants, who have never broken any rules.

I think you can understand that I start sweating when a user of your rank and reputation asks for negative feedback, campaigns blacklists for all participants from the campaign I'm currently enrolled in and I would like to know exactly why? What have we done wrong and what am I missing?

First of all suchmoon is a "she" and I doubt she cares to read this post and comment. Secondly, merits merits merits. The only good thing about merits is ranking up or at least that's what most people care about them for. Someone could have all my merits and I could care less. If you were making semi decent posts then you would be getting merited more than you have so far. You need to visit other sections than the discussion sections.

Now let's talk about money. Not 1 person said it's not ok to earn a dollar here. You think I manage campaigns free? I have not participated in a sig campaign for years until last month and that was only because I was offered a better rate then most campaigns out there. Earning money is not what the deal is here at all. It's how you earn money! You have fucked up twice now, and you want suchmoon and myself to believe that the almighty dollar won't make you fuck up again?

I know making money is important to over half the users here. I know the world is not fair man. Some places sig campaign money is better than jobs pay per month. If you came in here and actually gave a damn, you wouldn't be feeling how you feel though. This campaign popped up and you thought you'd just spam your way to hundreds of dollars. Find topics that actually interest you. Reply with answers that actually make sense. DON'T FUCKING BURSTPOST. It's pretty simple. Some days you might post 3 times, others you might post 15 times.

Cryptotalk Signature campaign participants coin-investor and robelneo, from September 27th to October 4th, both have left 190 posts in total.


Before that, coin-investor and robelneo had repeatedly stated that Yobit is a scam exchange and need to stay away from it.

---

There is a reason to think that accounts coin-investor, robelneo and also fortunecrypto could belong to the same person.


(Archive)

(Archive)


(Archive)

(Archive)


(Archive)

(Archive)


(Archive)

(Archive)


Related Addresses:



Miscellaneous:

Registering in the same campaigns
(Archive) Minter (coin-investor, robelneo)
(Archive) Stake.com (fortunecrypto, coin-investor)
(Archive) Whyfuture (coin-investor, fortunecrypto)
(Archive) CyberDice (coin-investor, robelneo)

Sending merit between profiles
(Archive) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49639743
(Archive) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50724022

I know that you're one of the cool guys here, i must say it.. You're one of the guys that i like here. The issue is that you're on Shipmixer's campaign, you're getting paid really well for the posts you're doing which is really normal. Now, what about the usual members here? They can't join you because of many criterias that we could not afford. The first thing is the merits which are not yet being spread equally between the members that they really deserve them. I'm one of the victims of the burst posting, i must commit that i did it because of the $, yep. We love crypto and we want to earn and that's extremely normal when talking about humain beings. The only issue here that i'm and also other members are facing is the reputation, our unique reputation. For example, Mr suchmoon came to my postings history and he did see me burst posting in the past and he tagged me and he said that i'm " a shitposter selling out the forum for few pennies". Well, Mr suchmoon, i'm not rich and i'm not getting hired or joining big campaigns here, these rewarding campaigns are limited to the highly trusted members of the community and you're amoung the list. It's normal that Mr suchmoon says that i'm a shitposter and that i'm selling the forum, he even wouldn't understand that i'm doing so much efforts here to help newbies/friends learn more about crypto. He judged me wrong in the first case and now, i did the same thing again and burst posted again. My reputation is now fucked up, i know. But, I would also like to refer to suchmoon that i did these wrong things to maintain a small source of revenue, it's wrong to destory the forum's servers by doing such activity but i'm really in pain right now because of the neutral tag. I understood the lesson, you won't see me doing the same acts but, really, the highly trusted members here are so strict. Even that i'm a senior, i'm still learning. I would like to say that i'm sorry, i understood what i did but i would like to request Mr yahoo, if possible, to not list my name in the list of the prohibited members from the signatures moderated by him. I'll try to enhance my postings quality and i'll refrain from the childish behaviour. No offense to you guys, i must admit that i trust each one of you and that i'm following each one of them since months. It makes me feel painful when they think that i'm a "suck for crack bitch" or a "shitposter".
All my apologies again to each member in this great forum and to Mr Yahoo, Mr suchmoon. I'll enhance my account, promise.

Have a look at Lalafell. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lalafell-967594

This poster was previously accused of posting the same thing with his alts and necrobumping threads
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4693847.msg42364189;topicseen#msg42364189

One of lalafell's alts was MetalGear https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/metalgear-971898
He's now also in this campaign.

Lalafell is still necroposting in threads. Like threads below where last posts were in July and he decided to refresh them all today.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52654309
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52654136
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52653977
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52653789

Old habits die hard?

I'm starting to become ever the more partial to the idea of holding some deterrence to those that participate in the campaign.

Given YoBit's reputation, would it make sense to blacklist them from your other campaigns?
If so, then what about the possibility of negative feedback (while the signature is active)?

Great find mate - hahaha, those guys are always good for a laugh!


LOL - how wise and scientific really.

Hello Yahoo,
Please take a look at this user: badykvik.  13 shitposts in the last 2 hours.

I have not seen your post history, i am not saying this to you but in general i have seen few posts where people are saying we post 2 - 3 post in an hour, we post 10 hrs a day so we are not bursting. Its seems soon those who are posting with 5-10 mins difference will find themselves guilty. Because if i am involve in a conversation , argument i can't wait half an hour to post my 2nd reply.
 
You can still be spamming in 5 mins intervals or smart spamming with 30 mins interval.

I just found it interesting that they had that kind of thought process about the exchange but were willing to work for the owner and be paid on that exchange. Seems very hypocritical of them.

Either they feel that way and wouldn't want to work with that exchange at all, or they spammed off some replies in their earlier posts.

You certainly have the right to do so but it would seem kinda retaliatory. Do the campaign rules include anything about disparaging comments regarding Yobit? I don't see that, I see only rules against spamming. So if you want to do it "by the book" I'd say get the rule added and only apply it going forward.

Just seen this interesting thread in Meta and wondered if there is really any good reason not to ban all of these users? If they don't trust an exchange, why should they be paid on that exchange?

Just... LOL  Bots really, hahah

Thanks for adding me to your list I made sure that my post interval is 25 to one hour and and spread it for 12 hours with 3 to 4 hours interval and about spam I can improve my posting, I don't take this personally it's all works and trying be a good forum posters
will try to improve but of course our manager Yahoo has the last say on this.