Topic: List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign - page 25. (Read 32248 times)

Probable spam/burstposting

Number of comments of some Cryptotalk campaign participants, from September 27th to October 4th:

teosanru - 150 posts

jmigdlc99 - 130 posts

yazher - 118 posts

iwantapony - 115 posts

ChrisPop - 99 posts

hashman - 98 posts

yoseph - 93 posts

bellicose - 90 posts

judeafante - 90 posts

SummerBliss - 82 posts

Try to visit the Altcoin Discussion section, maybe there is even more destroyed.

Obviously, the dollar / Bitcoin that is lit up there isn't the discussion that was talked about.
Money talking there.
One post 1.3 $ times 20 = 26 $ per day is fine for a one-month installment credit.
No problems, spam, important posts are not deleted, the problem is complete.

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184119.180
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181373.320
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175508.160
4. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188833.60
5. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1962536.2860
6. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139534.380

Recently woke up

scat - recently woke up after 2.5 years of inactivity, neg rep https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=scat

Morguk - posting after 1 year of inactivity https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Morguk

ivakar - more than 1-year gap in the posting history, before Cryptotalk campaign.

Vitamin_52 - suddenly woke up after 11 months of "sleep" and made over 30 posts in the last week.

bloogy - posting for the Cryptotalk campaign after 7 months of "sleep".

CarnagexD - 6-months gap before he woke up and made 60 posts in the last week.

GSpgh - woke up after 6 months of inactivity and left over 30 comments.

I am sure rule 32 only refers to one thread. That's why "reserved" posts are also excluded. These posts are following the announcement post.

EXACTLY. This is so spot on. A case can be made to ban every single user who ONLY posts in bitcoin discussion, altcoin discussion, and trading discussion boards. This is where you'll find all the megathreads and low value threads period. Low value threads will equal low value replies.

Users that open these threads never lock them either. Then a campaign like this pops up and users go digging up old megathreads and reopen the discussion.

Ninja, I am all yours and I HATE when people just repeat whats been said before just for posting sake - actually whenever I come across such a post, I am directly replying and kinda "flaming"... thats not what I am referring to though - I have just created a thread in the meta section as well - we really need to find a "solution" - generally speaking, I couldnt care less about the yobit campaign...

Edit: The definition yahoo mentioned (sorry yahoo, this is not against you in any way) - is not making sense with the "mole scenario"... except I am missing something and then I will be glad to learn and educate myself.

My opinion about this (if that matters): making a few posts in a short amount of time isn't hard. But in most cases, all the user is doing is coming to the forum to post 5~20 times in a short amount of time and leaving. Basically looking around in megathreads or generic posts for opportunities to post more generic stuff, which doesn't add anything to the conversation, so he can pretend he is having a real discussion while he is not. This with a lot of rapid posts is what helps destroy this forum.

Most of the times, he is just saying stuff that already have been said or which simply are garbage/useless. These "bitcoin is the future?" type of threads where people come and post 2-4 lines of "for me among the rest of cryptocurrency bitcoin has the most bright future" or similar in the 6th page of the thread (real example I just found after 1 minute in the Bitcoin Discussion board, from a user using a Cryptotalk signature). All this post did was count a +1 in Yobit's campaign count bot and waste my bandwidth. No one is actually going to read that.

It's not only the time between each post (at least for me). People act like all that matters is that they are posting, answering a generic question and that there is a X interval between every post. But it obviously isn't as simple as that. "Ok, my last post was 20 minutes ago. Now I'm free to go to Bitcoin Dicussion/Altcoin Discussion to post another generic answer".

That's why it is always pretty obvious that he/she is only making many posts in a row because he gets paid for that. I'm not sure if that's the case for the above user (he seems to be way above the average spammer, but I don't speak deustch), but for most people, that's what happens. If people stopped putting the signature and the pay-per-post above their real posting habits, nothing of that would ever happen. But sometimes you don't have anything to say but still want the extra $, while also being too lazy to think. Sorry for the rant.

I know that rule. I thought it was about posts (in the same thread) without posts from other users in between. Do you know what I mean?

What I did is not burst/spam because I often have several tabs open at the same time.

And they are not one-liners or pointless things. People who speak my language surely see it that way. Was as said also bad luck that it ran like this today and you punish it directly although I am 99% of the time here more than correct. Just didn't think it would end that way.

I am not involved in this campaign and dont want to be... I am just confused about the burstposting thing... You often read that in this forum and I really have not understood until now... I am very often making several posts within a very short time span - I am never spamming but if I have the time and feel in the mood, I am posting in threads I am already involved and new ones I find interesting and where I think I have to say something. And as a side note - I am very often pissed off because of people just posting random shit that doesnt make sense - so I am all yours when it comes to fighting spam and shitposting!

Well, I would understand if that burstposting thing was aimed at users who are doing many spammy posts within a short time frame.

Long story short: In my opinion, many posts within a few minutes dont necessarily have to be SPAM. What am I missing here?

Regarding Mole: He is a highly trusted German user with a great reputation who has never been spamming. I didnt check the posts you mentioned above but if the ban is just due to the fact that the posts came quickly one after another... well, I posted my opinion earlier and asked what I am missing.

Again, not that I have to justify my decision but in this case I will.

32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.

You being a hero member, you should already be familiar with the forums rules. They can be found HERE

I have been banned from the campaign and the reason mentioned is: "spam/burstposting".

So, may I ask exactly which one of these 2 is the reason for my ban?

If there is a criteria for maximum number of posts per hour or so, shouldn't it be explained in the rules section? The only thing you can find is this:

"Poor quality and unconstructive posts will not be tolerated on this campaign. You don't need to write an essay with each post but one word replies in spammy off topic threads or streams of constant half-assed one liners will immediately get you removed. Please just put some effort in to your posts and you'll be fine.

Users with negative feedback from defaulttrust members are no longer permitted on the campaign. If you sign up you will be removed.

Any user who hasn't made a post in over a month will also be removed."

I didn't break any of these rules. Is there a way for me to get unbanned?

Thanks.

Thanks for the quick answer. But directly without warning so take action?

There is probably not a single day like today. I guess it was bad luck that you see it today and punish it. Where is the definition in the rules I violated?

Had a lot of stress in the office today and so my time slots were used to post. Should also be irrelevant whether I write 1x per hour or 6x per hour... is about the total number.

But I already see that my arguments will certainly not count... and also the fact that now 2 days with only some come since I am not on the weekend at the PC but at the mobile phone type (as right now) will not change anything. But as already said directly so hard to reach through although I did not know anything wrong to do and for a long time much for the forum to do agrees me sadly... but fear it remains final.

But maybe it is enough if you check 1-2 other days to see how it otherwise runs off... more I can not expect. Thanks

So what their writing styles are matching. They are a family, their DNA will match too.



There is nothing you can do other than accept it. 
Your negative feedback has no impact, otherwise you would have given it 

So it wasn't you who posted your posts in short intervals?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52649512 12:36 pm
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52649391 12:25 pm
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52649290 12:13 pm
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52649226 12:08 pm

Then roughly a 3 hour gap and

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52647982 9:49 am
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52647968 9:47 am
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52647898 9:40 am
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52647868 9:37 am
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52647834 9:33 am
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52647795 9:29 am

Those are just from today. Look, I don't have to explain to everyone why they were banned from the campaign. The reason is in the list and as you can see it's justified. You 100% are busrtposting. Your opinion of yourself doesn't matter. It's nothing against you or anyone in the campaign period. You are breaking the rules of the forum and you have to be removed.

This campaign is under serious scrutiny and if I let you get a pass, I have to give everyone a pass. That's not good for anyone. Next time you join a campaign, try to respect the forum a bit as well. Not like you got a negative mark for anything.


To everyone else, stop pmming me asking why you were removed. I have a load of profiles to check each day and like I said above, the reason is normally listed. I was nice the 1st day or 2 and gave warnings but that's over. I don't have time to be nice if I want to keep the campaign as clean as I can. I have to treat everyone the same and make it fair for all. If you got removed, read the reason and deal with life. You choose whether you stay or go, not me. I'm just calling it how I see it.

dear yahoo62278,

because https://yobit.net/en/signature/ unfortunately shows me "removed from campaign by moderator" i'm going to say a word. i've seen that i'm also mentioned here since today:

why are you of the opinion that i did not deserve to wear this signature?

i put up with a lot but i never want to see this accusation in connection with my name. please take a look at my posting behaviour from the past in detail and think about your decision then.
i have also participated in campaigns that have very little required posts, sometimes 15 or more posts per day. so to mark me as a spammer (please also look at my reputation at trust and merits) i really do not find OK.
in this sense... hope you can reconsider your decision... and have a nice weekend

And this guy https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jayc89-142423
Last posts before today was Nov. 2018 and 23 posts made just today in under 25 minutes.


Edit:
Those two above are connected. They were both reported at


The other accounts who are still inactive should be banned as early as now before they register but I don't know if that can be done.

Excuse me but i see this guy like his just spamming with his one line post https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hashienewb-406762 someone can check him out.

I love how his/her attitude changes as more evidence is presented.

We are a team and a family working together
I don't know these people maybe you should ask my cousin because we haven't seen each other for a while
You are nice I really like what you're doing but you're wrong about me. You gave me feedback I'll be nice and won't do the same.
I don't have to prove anything

Great comedy, I feel entertained, thank you.

There are more accounts connected to them I've made an investigation about it here as well: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51112547

The line of those who've been busted just to make the investigator feel sympathetic, that line earns a million already, to be honest.

If you really don't believe me it's up to you. I don't need to give a long explanation or prove it anything again to you.
I also won't give you negative feedback like you do with me. Because I know your purpose is good to reduce the number of spammers and multiplier accounts in this forum. To make this forum even better. And now you have misunderstood with me. But it is ok for me.
 
God bless you bro