Pages:
Author

Topic: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. - page 8. (Read 227892 times)

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Bitcoin in France: first legal decision directly related to Bitcoin?


 Tongue  A few people around here know about the legal drama currently happening in France between us (Tibanne, MtGox and Macaraja, the company representing us in France) and french banks.



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-in-france-first-legal-decision-directly-related-to-bitcoin-41317

Isn't that very old stuff (2011-2012), now moot after MtGOX's collapse?
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
US District Court
Western District of Missouri
Western Division

Case NO. 4:14-cv-00815-BCW

FTC vs BF LABS, INC.

http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.110.0.pdf

Also this - see list of documents

http://www.woodlaw.com/cases/butterfly-labs-and-bf-labs-inc-bitcoin-miners?page=1

Alleged Consumer Fraud.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003
Can somebody please clean up here?
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
Hi All!!!

Just wanted to post a relevant legal news on the thread. There is a scammer named Deepak Chawla who is scamming many people here in India. Some people of the forum have approached me to take some legal action against this person and we are in the process of registering an FIR (First information report) with the police authorities. If the FIR is not registered then we would approach the courts to register the FIR. As per my knowledge this is gonna be the first case ever to come up before judicial authorities (in India) regarding bitcoins.

Will update you people as soon as there is a motion in the matter.

Regards
--
Kanishk Agarwal
Advocate
CriTaxCorp
Criminal-Taxation-Corporate
+919971666252
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003
How could this topic derail so dramatically?
Mods anywhere?
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003

I guess its not possible to join those as a Non-American?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Im afraid this list will continue to grow. I guess its the cost of dealing with an unregulated item.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)

I'm surprised it took that long.  

Holy crap those guys destroyed an incredible amount of assets...

Please refrain from commenting in this thread it's acting as a small index for legal cases but do feel free to add any interesting court cases and or regulatory cases you come along

Since I commented guess I'll add one for today

http://blog.bitlegal.io/post/78766455166/austrian-financial-agency-does-not-regulate-or

Marc Nickel - Thu Mar 06 2014

On March 6, the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) broke that nation’s public silence on Bitcoin and gave notice that the agency neither regulates nor supervises Bitcoin activities. The statement also includes a comment that Bitcoin businesses may need to be licensed by other regulatory bodies, outside of the FMA jurisdiction. These two pieces of information are delivered in the first two sentences, and the bulk of the announcement contains a warning about the risks of using Bitcoin and a link to the European Banking Authority warning issued in December 2013.

Source: http://www.fma.gv.at/en/special-topics/bitcoin.html
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003

The document below is a recent advisory note by the Central Bank of Brazil about crypto-currencies. 

http://www.bcb.gov.br/pt-br/Paginas/bc-esclarece-sobre-os-riscos-decorrentes-da-aquisicao-das-chamadas-moedas-virtuais-ou-moedas-criptografadas.aspx

Executive summary: crypto currencies should not be confused with electronic means for payments in BRL.  They have no emitting entity, backing institution or assets, no guarantees of acceptance or conversion to national currencies.  Their price may fluctuate wildly, even to zero, and governments may prevent their use.  They may get you involved in criminal investigations even if you use them in good faith.  They may be stolen by hackers.  We do not see them yet as a risk to the National Financial System, but we are following discussions in international forums and we may act if and when it is necessary.


[Approximate translation by Jorge Stolfi, provided for reader's convenience only.  The translation is not guaranteed to be accurate, especially with respect to the precise legal meaning of terms. This text should not be relied upon for legal purposes.]

BC informs about the risks associated with purchase of so-called "virtual currencies" or "cryptographic currencies"
February 19, 2014 17:01

The Central Bank of Brazil informs, first of all, that the so-called virtual currencies should not be confused with the "electronic currency" that are the subject of Law 12.865, of October 8, 2013, and their infra-legal regulations.  Electronic currencies, as disciplined by those norms, are assets stored in an electronic device or system that enable the end user to execute a payment trasaction valued in national currency [the Real, BRL --JS].  On the other hand, the so-called virtual currencies have their own form of denomination, that is, are expressed in accouting units that are distinct from the currencies emitted by sovereign governments, and cannot be considered electronic devices or systems for the storage of Reals.

​The use of so-called virtual currencies and the application, to them, of regulations that apply to the financial system and to payment systems, have been topics of international debate and statements by monetary authorities and other public authorities, with few conclusions to this moment.

The so-called virtual currencies are neither emittled nor guaranteed by any monetary authority.  Some are emitted and intermediated by non-financial entities, while others do not even have an entity that is responsible for their emission.  In both cases, the entities and persons who emit or act as intermediaries of those virtual assets are neither regulated nor supervised by monetary authorities of any country.

Those so-called virtual currencies have no guarantee of conversion to the official currency, and furthermore are not guaranteed by real assets of any kind. The conversion value of an asset known as virtual currency to currencies emitted by monetary authorities depends on the credibility and trust that the market agents may have in the acceptance of the so-called virtual currency as exchange instrument, and of the expectations of its appreciation.  There is, therefore, no governmental mechanism that would guarantee the official currency value of the instruments known as virtual currencies, leaving the risk of their acceptance wholly in the hands of users.

Because of their low transaction volume, of their low acceptance as exchange medium, and of the lack of clear perception about their legitimacy, the price variation of the so-called virtual currencies may be very large and fast, and may even lead to complete loss of their value.

On top of that, the eventual application, by monetary authorities of any country, of precautionary, coercive or punitive measures relative to the use of those assets, may significantly affect the price of said currencies, or even the possibility of their negotiation.

Furthermore, those virtual intruments may be used for illicit activities, which may lead to investigations by public authorities.  That way, the user of those virtual assets, even if he trades them in good faith, may find himself involved in said investigations.

Finally, the storage of the so-called virtual currencies in the so-called electronic wallets suffers from the risk that the owner of those assets suffers patriminial losses as a consequence of criminal attacks in the realm of the worldwide computer network.

In Brazil, even though the use of the so-called virtual currencies has yet to become a risk to the National Financial System, especially to retail payment transactions (article 6, paragraph 4 of Law 12.685/2013), the Central Bank of Brazil is following the evolution of the use of said instruments and the discussions in international forums on the topic -- especially about their nature, adequacy, and mechanism -- with the aim of eventually adopting measures within the scope of its legal mandate, if necessary.

Brasília, February 19, 2014
Central Bank of Brazil
Press Office
[email protected]

legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
This thread is no longer being updated all that much. As Bitcoin further permeates the world, most every nation (or state, etc.) will have content specific to that jurisdiction's involvement with Bitcoin.   Feel free to continue posting as you wish, but this thread will no longer be even close to being a comprehensive list as it had been for a period of time.

Other resources:

 - http://bitlegal.net
 - http://www.cryptocoinlaw.net
 - http://twitter.com/virtuallylaw
 - http://BitcoinFoundation.org
 - http://coindesk.com
 - http://datauthority.org (info: http://coindesk.com/bitcoin-industry-leaders-launch-data-a-self-regulatory-body)
 - http://bitcoinfinancialassociation.org
 - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Compilation_of_legal_and_regulatory_information

I've updated the first post with this update.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
There seems to be a lot of movement in the Legal Realm
Was wondering if this site seems like a fair representation for keeping track of some legal changes we might miss Stephen gave it a browse looks fair enough in its perspective for me.
http://bitlegal.net/

Russian Central Bank Issues a Strong Counterpoint to Sberbank Chief
2014-01-27
From http://bitlegal.net/
Abstract: Two strong positions on Bitcoin and virtual currency are emerging in Russia. On Jan. 27., the Central Bank of Russia warned that businesses involved with Bitcoin would potentially be considered involved in money laundering or terrorism financing. This is in sharp contrast to the Jan. 24 comments by the Sberbank CEO, who called restrictions on virtual currencies a "colossal step backward."

Sourcing towards
Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)
Press office
January 27, 2014
Location: Russia
http://www.cbr.ru/press/PR.aspx?file=27012014_1825052.htm

The Bank of Russia said that recently in the world have a certain distribution of the so-called "virtual currency", in particular, Bitcoin. By "virtual currencies" and there is no provision for them legally obliged entities. These operations are speculative in nature, carried out on the so-called "virtual exchanges" and carry a high risk of loss of value.

The Bank of Russia warns citizens and legal entities, primarily credit institutions and non-credit financial institutions, the use of "virtual currency" for them in exchange for goods (works, services) or cash in rubles and foreign currency.

According to article 27 of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)" issue in the Russian Federation monetary surrogates prohibited.

Due to the anonymous nature of the activity for the production of "virtual currency" unlimited range of actors and to use them for transactions citizens and legal persons may be, including unintentionally involved in illegal activities, including the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and terrorist financing.

The Bank of Russia has warned that Russian legal entities providing services for the exchange of "virtual currency" in rubles and foreign currency, as well as for goods (works, services) will be considered as a potential involvement in the implementation of suspicious transactions in accordance with the legislation on counteraction to legalization (laundering) proceeds of crime and financing of terrorism.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
STATE OF NEW JERSEY V. E-SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT
Location: Newark, New Jersey
November 19, 2013

Abstract: The Attorney General for the state of New Jersey sued E-Sports Entertainment whose software was updated mine bitcoins on its customers computers.

 - http://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases13/pr20131119a.html
 - http://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases13/E-Sports_Complaint_Consent-Judgment.pdf
 - http://bit.ly/17LqLd6 (Judgement viewed in browser-friendly PDF viewer)

Quote
The AG’s office says that company co-founder Eric Thunberg and software engineer Sean Hunczak were both involved in the scam. In a statement posted to its website, ESEA said the software was the work of a single engineer, presumably Hunczak

 - http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-gaming-company-mining-2013-11


Previously a class action suit had been filed:
 - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2666726
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003
http://www.coindesk.com/fincen-secret-service-bitcoin-foundation-hearing-bitcoin

Hearing with live stream titled: ‘Beyond Silk Road: potential risks, threats, and promises of virtual currencies’
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
Advisory Opinion Request to U.S. Federal Election Committee (FEC)
August 13, 2013
Location: Washington, DC, USA

Abstract: A Political Action Committee solicits the FEC's opinion on varios aspects of Bitcoin being accepted for political campain contributions.

Update:

The FEC's response:

Quote
The Commission concludes that CAF may accept Bitcoins as in-kind contributions under valuation, reporting, and disbursement procedures, as described below. CAF may not, however, make disbursements using Bitcoins. Instead CAF must sell its Bitcoins and deposit the proceeds in its campaign depositories before using the funds.
[...]
Thus, because Bitcoins are neither the currency of any country nor negotiable instruments, Bitcoins are not “money” under Commission regulations. Therefore, a political committee that receives Bitcoin contributions may not treat them as monetary contributions.
[...]
Like securities that a political committee may receive into and hold in a brokerage account, Bitcoins may be received into and held in a Bitcoin wallet until the committee liquidates them.
[...]
If the committee sells the Bitcoins directly to a purchaser, and therefore knows the identity of that purchaser, the purchase is itself considered to be a contribution.

 - http://saos.nictusa.com/aodocs/201315.pdf
 - http://bit.ly/1gwzhVr (Using browser-friendly PDF viewer)
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
Perhaps you should add the wiki to the OP of this thread?

Good suggestion.  Done.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
Perhaps you should add the wiki to the OP of this thread?
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
Yeah, both are good.
I created a new announcement thread just in case to let everyone know about this.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
FYI, I created a stub wiki article - Compilation of legal and regulatory information.

It would be cool if we banded together and filled in relevant bits in an concentrated format.

Thanks for doing that.  This thread has bitcoin-related developments such as the Alydian bankruptcy filing, which is a court case but has little to do with regulatory issues.  And thus is probably not a good candidate for that wiki article.  But it would be good for these to continue being recorded. So perhaps we would want to keep this thread going, but also post relevant legal and regulatory developments to that wiki article as well?
Pages:
Jump to: