Man China looks nasty... an extended drop looks likely.
no worries, smoothie is watching like a hawk to save Litecoin when it's most needed
Topic: Litecoin TANKING...opinions on future outlook both nearterm and long term? - page 4. (Read 6548 times)
August 13, 2014, 02:45:04 AM
no worries, smoothie is watching like a hawk to save Litecoin when it's most needed
August 13, 2014, 02:42:47 AM
Man China looks nasty... an extended drop looks likely.
August 13, 2014, 02:41:24 AM
I guess that's a "Yes"? lol
If this helps you sleep better, coinsider it yes
August 13, 2014, 02:40:14 AM
In.....your....opinion.
Are you done crying now? lol
Are you done crying now? lol
Since we're both laughing at this little non-issue obviously, let's call it a day
unless you have anything else to add to this heated debate I guess that's a "Yes"? lol
Heated debate? No just having fun over here watching a newbie attempt to get the best of me...and then fail. Oh noes!
haha August 13, 2014, 02:39:17 AM
In.....your....opinion.
Are you done crying now? lol
Are you done crying now? lol
Since we're both laughing at this little non-issue obviously, let's call it a day
unless you have anything else to add to this heated debate August 13, 2014, 02:37:16 AM
smoothie,
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over
You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say Oh you mean the post where you :
1. Got the value wrong and had to remind you what was really discussed just to have you say "whatever"?
2. Decided to bring something up that obviously I thought was over with?
3. Attempted to call me out on a bet that you yourself backed out on?
And after all of that have the audacity to call me dishonest / predator / baby? Yes I will speak up when you attempt to put me into a category like that.
smoothie,
sure you can speak up. That doesn't change anything. You behave like a baby now. You tried to take advantage of me by setting unfair terms of the bet. That was a dishonest act towards me. Now your reputation is at stake and you have to protect it by offering excuses. Good luck with that
In.....your....opinion.
Are you done crying now? lol
This doesn't in any way tarnish my reputation. Please try and see if it does. Honestly I think you are in over you head here buddy.
BTW welcome to the forums newbie.
August 13, 2014, 02:35:09 AM
smoothie,
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over
You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say Oh you mean the post where you :
1. Got the value wrong and had to remind you what was really discussed just to have you say "whatever"?
2. Decided to bring something up that obviously I thought was over with?
3. Attempted to call me out on a bet that you yourself backed out on?
And after all of that have the audacity to call me dishonest / predator / baby? Yes I will speak up when you attempt to put me into a category like that.
smoothie,
sure you can speak up. That doesn't change anything. You behave like a baby now. You tried to take advantage of me by setting unfair terms of the bet. That was a dishonest act towards me. Now your reputation is at stake and you have to protect it by offering excuses. Good luck with that
August 13, 2014, 02:28:30 AM
smoothie,
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over
You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say Oh you mean the post where you :
1. Got the value wrong and had to remind you what was really discussed just to have you say "whatever"?
2. Decided to bring something up that obviously I thought was over with?
3. Attempted to call me out on a bet that you yourself backed out on?
And after all of that have the audacity to call me dishonest / predator / baby? Yes I will speak up when you attempt to put me into a category like that.
Oh and I forgot one...talking about my upbringing as if you know anything about me.
Very classy buddy.
August 13, 2014, 02:26:44 AM
smoothie,
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say
check out post #39 of this thread, all I asked you was a simple question as a sort of friendly nudge which you could just make a joke about and it'd be all over
You were the one who had to bring all this out again about that bet. Now you ended in the position where you have to explain yourself away. That'll teach you a lesson. Or not. Old habits die hard, as they say August 13, 2014, 02:25:39 AM
the coins changing owners increased sharply
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/#markets
now over 3million US $ a day. would they more people want to sell, then people want to buy.
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/#markets
now over 3million US $ a day. would they more people want to sell, then people want to buy.
im seeing sellers selling higher and the ones are panicking are sellling lower to get what ever they can get for there coin, sad these traders get all itchy to let go undervalued coins at the moment I bought some and now holding for a long time
August 13, 2014, 02:19:27 AM
Oh and I never said Litecoin wasn't going down below 0.008 in 2014. haha
You could be a rotschild if you got a dollar each time you try to play with words. Are/were you a lawyer by any chance?
In the end it all boils down to your trying to save your face now that you were called out. The only way to save your reputation is to admit you had tried to take advantage of me by setting unfair terms of the bet. But I don't expect you to do that, of course, given what I think about your moral principles. Well, I am not the one to make the first step to save your reputation, I don't get any benefits from that, you're the one who has to do it, only you can help yourself My reputation has nothing to do with this bet lol.
Oh noes I am going to be outted as a dishonest person because the guy who couldn't get the facts straight and chose to decline my bet is now calling me dishonest because he disagreed with the "fairness" of a simple bet.
I'm shaking in my boots.
You must be new here
as you can't troll me or attempt to make me succumb to your attempt to make me fear about my reputation being at risk. LOL please make me laugh more!
Oh noes Oh noes Oh noes!
I'll leave you with this... "Unfair" is a subjective word as your definition of what it means and what I believe it means obviously differ.
August 13, 2014, 02:15:40 AM
Oh and I never said Litecoin wasn't going down below 0.008 in 2014. haha
You could be a rotschild if you got a dollar each time you try to play with words. Are/were you a lawyer by any chance?
In the end it all boils down to your trying to save your face now that you were called out. The only way to save your reputation is to admit you had tried to take advantage of me by setting unfair terms of the bet. But I don't expect you to do that, of course, given what I think about your moral principles. Well, I am not the one to make the first step to save your reputation, I don't get any benefits from that, you're the one who has to do it, only you can help yourself August 13, 2014, 02:03:08 AM
Your definition of "Fair" has little to do with being "honest". My reputation is 100% clean with only honest deals. Nice attempt at being passively aggressive. Doesn't work on me buddy lol
Like I said keep back pedaling. Sure was funny to see you call me out just to get corrected on what you thought happened.
Your view of what is fair and what I believe is fair doesn't constitute one or the other is right or wrong. But you have to concede you made the claim and then when getting called out on it in a bet you basically backed out because you didn't like the "terms".
Not surprising.
Like I said keep back pedaling. Sure was funny to see you call me out just to get corrected on what you thought happened.
Your view of what is fair and what I believe is fair doesn't constitute one or the other is right or wrong. But you have to concede you made the claim and then when getting called out on it in a bet you basically backed out because you didn't like the "terms".
Not surprising.
You may have a 100% clean reputation in making deals doing trades, but this doesn't have anything to do with your attempt to take advantage of the counterparty when making a bet. Which in my book registers as playing unfair. Sure, you like to win, who doesn't, but I see that principles of noble conduct are a vague concept to you. Well, it talks much about your upbringing and what has been embedded as moral conduct unto you when you were in tender age. That basically defines what a man is in his later age. I don't care if you did thousands of trades with other people, you tried to take advantage of me in our bet and you were called out, simple as that. Now stop being a baby and calling me aggressive, be a man.
Oh, and Litecoin is still going below 0.008 in 2014.
I love how you overlooked what I said about you saying "Fair" and "Honest". "fairness" does not imply how honest or dishonest one is... get it straight.
LOL stop being a baby? You ended up bringing this up in your original comment in this thread to me... Remember? Look who is the baby and also couldn't get the facts straight in your attempt to call me out.
Don't presume you know anything about me and my "upbringing". As if you would know ...
I called you out on your claims in the form of a bet and you declined. That tells me you didn't really believe in your claim. Nothing more. Obviously you didn't let it go given you brought it up again in a failed attempt to "call me out" and not have all the facts straight.
Why should anyone take you seriously if you can't even get the facts straight of what you were calling me out on in the first place?
For all to see...
Nice try to down play my honesty level by attempting to make me out to be a predator in terms of the bet. What a baby you appear to be lol.
I wasn't calling you anything but passively aggressive...not just aggressive. There is a difference. Perhaps you should look that up before you start getting your facts wrong...again. lol
Oh and I never said Litecoin wasn't going down below 0.008 in 2014...it was only when a time period came into play did I mention it. haha
Lastly, it HAS everything to do with my honesty track record as I have done multiple bets on this forum with no issues. You are the first to throw a fit and fail at doing it. Thank you for the entertainment.
August 13, 2014, 01:57:33 AM
the coins changing owners increased sharply
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/#markets
now over 3million US $ a day. would they more people want to sell, then people want to buy.
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/#markets
now over 3million US $ a day. would they more people want to sell, then people want to buy.
August 13, 2014, 01:35:44 AM
I'm a ltc bagholder (my biggest holding), alts have flooded the market but sooner or later an alt crash will drive most to ltc as the reserve. As I don't trade fiat I'm personally indifferent to its price v USD, for me though hopefully most my other bags improve Vs ltc so I can increase my ltc holdings.
For the increase my fiat types I think ltc below $5 has greater profit potential then btc, though a sudden btc rise would lower ltc further, such a btc rally would sooner or later drag ltc up.
yes very good analysis, I think so this will happen, though im seeing alot of panic selling dont get why though, unless is all part of pump and dump schemeFor the increase my fiat types I think ltc below $5 has greater profit potential then btc, though a sudden btc rise would lower ltc further, such a btc rally would sooner or later drag ltc up.
August 13, 2014, 01:27:04 AM
Your definition of "Fair" has little to do with being "honest". My reputation is 100% clean with only honest deals. Nice attempt at being passively aggressive. Doesn't work on me buddy lol
Like I said keep back pedaling. Sure was funny to see you call me out just to get corrected on what you thought happened.
Your view of what is fair and what I believe is fair doesn't constitute one or the other is right or wrong. But you have to concede you made the claim and then when getting called out on it in a bet you basically backed out because you didn't like the "terms".
Not surprising.
Like I said keep back pedaling. Sure was funny to see you call me out just to get corrected on what you thought happened.
Your view of what is fair and what I believe is fair doesn't constitute one or the other is right or wrong. But you have to concede you made the claim and then when getting called out on it in a bet you basically backed out because you didn't like the "terms".
Not surprising.
You may have a 100% clean reputation in making deals doing trades, but this doesn't have anything to do with your attempt to take advantage of the counterparty when making a bet. Which in my book registers as playing unfair. Sure, you like to win, who doesn't, but I see that principles of noble conduct are a vague concept to you. Well, it talks much about your upbringing and what has been embedded as moral conduct unto you when you were in tender age. That basically defines what a man is in his later age. I don't care if you did thousands of trades with other people, you tried to take advantage of me in our bet and you were called out, simple as that. Now stop being a baby and calling me aggressive, be a man.
Oh, and Litecoin is still going below 0.008 in 2014.
August 13, 2014, 01:15:22 AM
Back then that is your take that it was in my favor. But remember you were the one that was so sure LTC would tank so I only called you out in a manner that would confirm your claims if you had accepted my bet and to me that would have been fair as you made the initial claim, I just pushed you to back your mouth up with actual coin/money. We both know how that ended. lol
Nice try but it would seem you are the one with amnesia as you couldn't even remember the value we were discussing. 0.009 and 0.008 are not the same lol.
Nice try but it would seem you are the one with amnesia as you couldn't even remember the value we were discussing. 0.009 and 0.008 are not the same lol.
And I still hold my belief that LTC will tank, that's exactly why it doesn't matter if it was 0.008 or 0.009 that was in the bet, because it's going to 0.005 and lower
Your terms were very unfair and I couldn't accept them even with full belief of the Litecoin's sad destiny, as I like to play fair and only deal with honest people who like to do the same The 0.01 resistance was broken last year. This is not new territory. In November it went to 0.0075, then a reverse in fortune occurred and it sprang back to 0.042 ........... in the same month!
There were very prominent pumpers of Litecoin back then, but they sold at the top and lost interest
Your definition of "Fair" has little to do with being honest. My reputation is 100% clean with only honest deals. Nice attempt at being passively aggressive. Doesn't work on me buddy lol
Like I said keep back pedaling. Sure was funny to see you call me out just to get corrected on what you thought happened.
Your view of what is fair and what I believe is fair doesn't constitute one or the other is right or wrong. But you have to concede you made the claim and then when getting called out on it in a bet you basically backed out because you didn't like the "terms".
Not surprising.
August 13, 2014, 12:40:24 AM
This is just a bookmark for me, will post more tomorrow .
. August 12, 2014, 11:55:29 PM
Back then that is your take that it was in my favor. But remember you were the one that was so sure LTC would tank so I only called you out in a manner that would confirm your claims if you had accepted my bet and to me that would have been fair as you made the initial claim, I just pushed you to back your mouth up with actual coin/money. We both know how that ended. lol
Nice try but it would seem you are the one with amnesia as you couldn't even remember the value we were discussing. 0.009 and 0.008 are not the same lol.
Nice try but it would seem you are the one with amnesia as you couldn't even remember the value we were discussing. 0.009 and 0.008 are not the same lol.
And I still hold my belief that LTC will tank, that's exactly why it doesn't matter if it was 0.008 or 0.009 that was in the bet, because it's going to 0.005 and lower
Your terms were very unfair and I couldn't accept them even with full belief of the Litecoin's sad destiny, as I like to play fair and only deal with honest people who like to do the same The 0.01 resistance was broken last year. This is not new territory. In November it went to 0.0075, then a reverse in fortune occurred and it sprang back to 0.042 ........... in the same month!
There were very prominent pumpers of Litecoin back then, but they sold at the top and lost interest
August 12, 2014, 05:51:03 PM
sooner or later an alt crash will drive most to ltc as the reserve
In your wildest dreams.
The only reserve in this business is BTC. A reserve currency means that other currencies are "priced" in the reserve. Litecoin had a brief period where that happened on a couple of exchanges but it never took hold. It´s rapidly becoming ´just another alt´. Now that the 0.01 resistance is broken, don´t expect it to ever return.
We´re into the next phase of cryptos.
The 0.01 resistance was broken last year. This is not new territory. In November it went to 0.0075, then a reverse in fortune occurred and it sprang back to 0.042 ........... in the same month!
http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/period-charts.php?period=alltime&resolution=day&pair=ltc-btc&market=btc-e
Jump to: