Pages:
Author

Topic: Live Sports Betting vs virtual Games Betting (Read 320 times)

hero member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 564
October 29, 2023, 05:26:20 PM
#46
I'll always choose live matches over virtual games betting any day.

Get this, with live matches, you know for certain that games are not affected by any external forces in any way. If there is, people would have notice easily and the result of the match might even get nullified by the games board and the gambling platforms. Whereas in virtual games, you don't know how they come up with such an outcome. They use algorithms and several calculations that might be rigged for all you know, and you won't have any say to the outcome as they'll reinforce that nothing is wrong with how they conduct these virtual games.

Also in a live game, you will feel the thrill and actually enjoy the games. You have someone to root for, and know that everything that's happening in front of you is true and not just some simulations on a screen governed by calculations and algorithms that you probably know nothing about.



Thinking of the possibility, I believe virtual game is more on a game of chance, so it is quite hard to analyze the possible result of the game.  Unlike in live sports betting, virtual games betting rely on a random result so if I want to rely on my sports prediction skill, I would choose live sports betting than the virtual games betting.  This way if I have the right information, I might be able a more chance of winning than virtual game betting.  Besides watching live games is more thrilling as the time slowly unfolds if our prediction is correct.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 509
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
If you really want to get entertained gambling I think live betting gets you that because in it you get to feel the game and all the adrenaline stimulation that rush I'm you brings about the entertainment when they eventually die down after your win or loss as the case may be. When you go virtual you are playing to make instant Money and overlook the entertainment that comes with gambling.

They both have their associated advantages and disadvantages aswell, some of which can be with how much returns you make on either of them which will definitely aid your preference. Live will definitely delay your expectations and if later turns out a loss you will go empty hand after all the wait but with virtual it's almost instant, secondly you could not be so accurate with live because human tendencies will definitely play out but with virtual you could carefully observe the repetitive algorithm and be lucky with your guess.
hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 521
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
For me, I prefer to bet on sports betting, which provides a special experience and pleasure when betting and then watching the live broadcast of the match to see how the club I choose looks and that is the sensation when betting at the same time as watching the broadcast as if my heart is racing, wanting to see the chosen club win. .
Maybe it's different with virtual game betting, maybe some people like this type of betting, but I'm a little distrustful of this type of betting and I think sometimes there is something strange, like it's not interesting or doesn't provide any sensation.
But what I do is not about money but the feeling of satisfaction of winning bets with high odds as if I want to gain experience with every bet I make.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
Live Sports Betting vs virtual Games Betting
Indeed, virtual games and live betting are often played by sports betting fans, but I don't like betting on physical activities like what happens in virtual sports games, I like to place bets directly like I do 1 (Home/Host), X (Draw), 2 (Away) 1X2 in general.

But for those who like challenges, of course virtual sports games are their choice, as I have seen my friends play, such as Wii Sports, There are several types of games offered there, tennis, golf, boxing and so on, as well as Pokemon Go type games, which is also a virtual sports game.

For me, I prefer to bet in person rather than virtually, as I said above.
hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 605

Also in a live game, you will feel the thrill and actually enjoy the games. You have someone to root for, and know that everything that's happening in front of you is true and not just some simulations on a screen governed by calculations and algorithms that you probably know nothing about.

The significant difference between sports betting live games and virtual games is striking. It seems like sports betting live games cater to a more mature audience, those who are truly passionate about gambling significant amounts. They appreciate the transparency of the game and can analyze it based on statistics.

On the other hand, it's undeniable that virtual game betting also has a substantial market and is already a billion-dollar industry.

https://www.skyquestt.com/report/virtual-sports-betting-market
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 529
casinosblockchain.io
Virtual sports betting is typically a blind betting pattern of gambling that's how I view it to be, you don't have a clue on how to analyze the team's strength and weakness you're doing a complete guess work that's controlled by computers detecting outcomes of the virtual matches that's the reasons I scarcely play virtual sports bets.

These virtual games are being programmed by the site owners to their own advantage as they can easily manipulate the outcome of an event to their favour whereas in live betting you are seeing a physical challenge by both teams so whatever the outcome of the game is you will be convinced because it is actually real and you've watched how the game is being played so you won't have any doubt at all.
with live matches there are plethora of informations about a match to guide you the gambler in making better decisions (predictions) and you have all the times it take to make calculative bets  unlike virtual games that you are left with just 2-4 minutes to make predictions about their outcomes putting the gambler under pressure (what is the feasibility in you make calculative decisions to get a win playing under pressure) and this is the part the house has a hedge over the gambler aside from the games being programmed to play in a controlled way.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I'll always choose live matches over virtual games betting any day.

Get this, with live matches, you know for certain that games are not affected by any external forces in any way. If there is, people would have notice easily and the result of the match might even get nullified by the games board and the gambling platforms. Whereas in virtual games, you don't know how they come up with such an outcome. They use algorithms and several calculations that might be rigged for all you know, and you won't have any say to the outcome as they'll reinforce that nothing is wrong with how they conduct these virtual games.

Also in a live game, you will feel the thrill and actually enjoy the games. You have someone to root for, and know that everything that's happening in front of you is true and not just some simulations on a screen governed by calculations and algorithms that you probably know nothing about.
full member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 212
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?
None of these two is ever an easy kind of game to play, but for me, I always most times play live games more than virtual bets which is controlled by an algorithm, making virtual game betting not an easy kind of betting for anyone to go for since it's outcome are always unpredictable, unlike in the case of real-time live games, whereby if the match has gone far, you are likely to have a clue on which team likely to win and place a bet in their favour, and most times likely to win.
Playing a live game will really feel when we almost lose but luck comes to us so we can win the game we are playing, but it will be very different if we play virtual betting then what we are fighting against is an algorithm and it is very difficult to win except luck. on our side and we can win. However, each person certainly has a different way of enjoying the bets they play and if there is no place around them to be able to play live bets, of course they have to choose to bet virtually.
sr. member
Activity: 1428
Merit: 308
I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?



I think most of us would choose live sports betting than virtual games betting. First, the excitement and the thrill that lives sports betting is incomparable, because it makes us feel as if we are involved in the game. And you can clearly watch and observe the real action going on. Unlike in virtual games betting, the games are programmed, and we can say that it is somehow controlled and manipulated by the developers, thus making it less enjoyable. However, one of the advantages of virtual games is its accessibility. Because you can literally play anywhere and anytime without compromising your time for it is just one click away. Also, sometimes I feel like virtual games are becoming repetitive and there is nothing new about it. Unlike when you are watching it in live action, you cannot expect anything because everything can happen. But again, both are good. It's just a matter of which is more enjoyable, and which is more convenient.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1121
☢️ alegotardo™️
So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

I certainly prefer sports betting, but I confess that this is each person's personal taste and can vary greatly from one to another.
My preference in sports games is because I know much more about football than any other virtual game, so I have more confidence when betting on them, in addition to being a sport that I follow daily, so sports betting ends up being a "complement" for me. of something that is pleasurable to me.

However, I see that betting on virtual games is growing a lot with each passing day and I respect anyone who bets on them, if it is a fair way of making money and enjoyable too, there is nothing fairer than betting on them.
sr. member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 366
This highly depends on your interest. There are those who are more inclined to virtual games rather than actual games. If they are to gamble, they will probably be betting on those virtual games rather than on actual matches. But for me, I'm not a fan of these virtual matches. So I prefer actual sports matches not just to bet on but also to watch.

The disadvantage of actual sports matches is that they are scheduled. Your favorite sports matches don't happen all the time. Virtual games can be more easily available, but I don't find it fun. There's no thrill involved. They're more random unlike actual sports games.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 1901
Shuffle.com
So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?
I'll always pick live betting over virtual games because those simulated sports can't replicate the experience I get in actual sports betting. I do agree that live betting is unpredictable if you're going to bet on every live match. The same can be said with virtual games when they rely more on luck due to how it works, so you can't back your bets with information compared to live betting. Live betting doesn't give me constant wins but it's still worth using when it gives you the option to jump in on matches you've missed and sometimes you could get good value bets through live odds if you learn how to wait.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 747
I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?
None of these two is ever an easy kind of game to play, but for me, I always most times play live games more than virtual bets which is controlled by an algorithm, making virtual game betting not an easy kind of betting for anyone to go for since it's outcome are always unpredictable, unlike in the case of real-time live games, whereby if the match has gone far, you are likely to have a clue on which team likely to win and place a bet in their favour, and most times likely to win.
hero member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 518
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?



The Live sports bet will be the desired option by the most of the gambler,Because it had more accurate results based on our sports knowledge.The reason for the gambler to choose the sports bet was easy to bet in the game by the sports knowledge.This game can be used as the passive income for the gambler based on the knowledge of the gambler in the certain sports.This sports bet was not suitable for the gambler with less sports knowledge or no sports knowledge in the desired game.The patience was most important thing in the gambling and specially for the sports bet.Because the player game can be changed on the particular day.
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 357
So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

This is actually depends on the situation, I do live betting if I was not able to place a bet before the game start and also do the virtual games betting since its also entertaining. I prefer both and have no specific preference with regards to this. Having your knowledge about this two can be a big help for you when it comes to decision making. Betting can be more fun if you are betting with your favorite sports, just make sure to stay responsible.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1045
Goodnight, ohh Leo!!! 🦅
I won't even try virtual gaming since I've got full conviction about it... It's totally programmed and controlled by the casinos - atleast in way that's fairly profitable to 'em ... I sometimes also think that makes them to be renewing an update on everyday games or so .. cus anyone could easily follow-up the result series..
I prefer sports as livegames over there are played by humans and are likely not to get manipulated.. atleast the major league games are not .. I'm aware alot of minority Leagus do so though.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1083
So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

End up depending on how far you know how to play both the usual sports betting and virtual games. If you don't know the other one, of course, you will select the other as your own preference.  If a bettor knows how that game works, both will be entertaining and amusing to them.

Since I'm not a fan of virtual game betting, therefore my preference will be the usual sports betting.

It's just that I have been doing sports betting for a long now compared to virtual games betting that I rarely touched, simple as that.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 368
In-play bet is what does it for me. With in play bets you get to learn about the team and players well. Which helps to build some skills and analytical abilities that is transferrable to other in-play games. It even makes you to be current with the football. Virtual games is total a waste of a money and time of course. There is real still being built here. This is what most of those gambling addicts struggle to quit.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 321
Just so I'm clear, when you say live sports betting you mean betting on a sports game that is already on right? Like the game is live? If that's what you mean then I prefer virtual betting.

Not that virtual betting is ultimately better, but in live betting, the odds are usually smaller. If the odds are big then it's very difficult for that option to play. For instance, betting on a football team that is already losing 2-0 to win looks more difficult to happen. I know there are many options to play but you have to be watching the game to make the right bets.
While virtual better can make you lose more money, it's better if you're lucky.
If I gamble and I've not won in virtual betting after 3 straight bets, I end it for that period.
Virtual betting needs much more discipline or you could empty your account.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1335
Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody
I never understood virtual betting. Why would you bet on matches that aren't real, just calculated by algorithm? If you want that, you can simply play dice - fast and easy and at least you know what you're betting on. With virtual games it feels like you should know why you lost your money, but really you don't.
Live events are real, there's nothing better. Let's say you bet on boxing - you know why the player lost. You saw him making mistakes, getting outpunched, bleeding. You know you lost the money because the fighter really lost the match and it's on his record forever.
I also like watching these events and feeling the adrenaline of the last round coming or the last minute of the game. It's great especially when you know you're winning and there's so little time left before it confirms.
Pages:
Jump to: