Well everyone is entitled to his or her own view of the one that's more beneficial to them but for me I prefer betting on live events to playing online virtual games because virtual games consumes lots of money within a short interval and sometimes as you keep losing on vituals the more you keep on playing and before you know it you must have exhausted all the money in your pocket. Even if people records winning on virtual, the rate is very few.
Online live sports betting gives you and edge especially when a strong team is losing to a weaker opponent you will see the odds go high and one can still gamble the stronger side to win with the increments of their odds and before you know it the stronger side equalizes the match and wins. Again you spend less on live events as until the end of the event you may not be able to stake again. There is also possibility for you to judge the outcome of the match while the match is live as their are most cases when we judge a match base on odds but as soon as the match starts you see that the opponent are performing better so you can decide to give the odd to the best performing team while the match is still on.
Topic: Live Sports Betting vs virtual Games Betting - page 3. (Read 412 times)
In sport gambling, I prefer in-play most. In-play is betting on a real match, not virtual matches or betting. In bookies, I prefer reality and I gamble using virtual matches at times and which is very rear. In in-play matches, the result csn be very fast and it would have been settled during the match. Although virtual betting has the advantage of not taking more than 30 seconds and some gamblers like that. If you go to betting agent, you will see many people in the place betting on virtual matches for over many minutes to some many hours. But I prefer real sport betting.
I've heard this too from a friend. He also had success with virtual sports games and other virtual games and he even invited me to test it out but the problem is I don't have the appetite for the said games unlike how it is from watching basketball which answers the last question of OP. Yes, basketball still makes my heart race when my bet is near winning or on the brink of losing. 
I prefer the NBA but I also watch other leagues like the FIBA last time and the Olympics this upcoming year.
I had success with live sports betting too but the only problem is the time. It's a 12 hours difference so sometimes I am still sound asleep while the games are already starting. Live betting can be profitable but still you must have the love for the game for a higher success of winning your bets.
I prefer the NBA but I also watch other leagues like the FIBA last time and the Olympics this upcoming year. I had success with live sports betting too but the only problem is the time. It's a 12 hours difference so sometimes I am still sound asleep while the games are already starting. Live betting can be profitable but still you must have the love for the game for a higher success of winning your bets.
I'm more into real action, so I prefer sports betting between the two. However, I think it varies from gambler to gambler since we don't all have the same preferences. I also believe that both are popular, but obviously, sports betting is the bigger industry here, and it was popularized before virtual games betting. Maybe that's why I remain loyal to sports betting because I learned it first, and personally, I love sports, so it really adds an enticing element to gambling while watching your favorite sports.
Regarding profitability, I wouldn't say much because I have nothing to boast about. I'm just a regular gambler, content with small gains, and can easily accept losses.
Regarding profitability, I wouldn't say much because I have nothing to boast about. I'm just a regular gambler, content with small gains, and can easily accept losses.
I don't think they are two comparable game modes.
with a live match you can always evaluate the status of the players on the field, there is a history, in short ... lots of information and data that helps you in your bet evaluation.
A virtual game is practically already determined and you never have these reference points that you would find in a live game... I See this as a cruciale differenze that really matters!
with a live match you can always evaluate the status of the players on the field, there is a history, in short ... lots of information and data that helps you in your bet evaluation.
A virtual game is practically already determined and you never have these reference points that you would find in a live game... I See this as a cruciale differenze that really matters!
I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?
Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.
So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?
Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.
So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?
Jump to: